Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 9 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 31 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 86 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 211 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Ebel, Robert L. | 10 |
| White, Edward M. | 7 |
| Anderson, Paul S. | 6 |
| Handleman, Chester | 6 |
| Frisbie, David A. | 5 |
| Burton, Richard F. | 4 |
| Couch, Brian A. | 4 |
| Dube, William V. | 4 |
| Anderson, Johnston | 3 |
| Crocker, Linda | 3 |
| Donovan, Jenny | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 61 |
| Teachers | 44 |
| Researchers | 24 |
| Students | 17 |
| Administrators | 5 |
| Parents | 3 |
| Policymakers | 2 |
Location
| Australia | 18 |
| Canada | 18 |
| California | 15 |
| United Kingdom | 13 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 9 |
| Africa | 6 |
| Germany | 6 |
| Netherlands | 6 |
| Turkey | 6 |
| United Kingdom (Great Britain) | 6 |
| Brazil | 5 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Civil Rights Act 1964 Title… | 1 |
| Education for All Handicapped… | 1 |
| Job Training Partnership Act… | 1 |
| Kentucky Education Reform Act… | 1 |
| Personal Responsibility and… | 1 |
| Temporary Assistance for… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Robinson, Peter – IRAL, 1970
Tests which the foreign language competence of the learner are the chief focus of the discussion, and the following aspects of such tests are discussed: purpose level, type, selection, form, gradation, order, number of items, administration of test, correction, and validation. (FB)
Descriptors: Admission Criteria, Evaluation, Language Instruction, Language Learning Levels
Peer reviewedHolcomb, David J. – College Student Journal, 1972
The grouping procedure for objective type examinations described in this paper can be a helpful tool in making examinations learning experiences for students. The technique provides instructors with specific information for planning remedial programs and helps them evaluate the curriculum and their teaching. (Author)
Descriptors: Curriculum Evaluation, Evaluation, Learning Experience, Objective Tests
Peer reviewedRobinson, Peter – English Language Teaching, 1971
Based on a paper delivered at the Canadian Linguistics Association Congress held in Toronto, Canada, June 10-13, 1969. (DS)
Descriptors: English, Language Instruction, Language Skills, Language Tests
Peer reviewedStiggins, Richard J.; Bridgeford, Nancy J. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1983
This review, with profiles of 51 available writing/language usage tests from most major test publishing companies, provides technical information on the tests, the evolution of test characteristics, the tests' role as writing samples, and issues in psychometric quality. Published objective writing tests are changing in important and positive ways.…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Objective Tests, Psychometrics, Test Construction
Peer reviewedMcClain, Lucinda – Teaching of Psychology, 1983
Grade A undergraduate psychology students used different test-taking strategies on a multiple-choice exam than did C or F students. In general, the strategies of the best students were characterized by a more thorough consideration of the alternative answers for each question. (RM)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Educational Research, Higher Education, Multiple Choice Tests
Peer reviewedMurphy, R. J. L. – British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1982
To study sex differences in test performance, the performance of males and females on 16 General Certificate of Education exams was analyzed in England. Results show that males perform better on objective tests than females. (Author/JJD)
Descriptors: Achievement, Foreign Countries, Objective Tests, Prediction
Peer reviewedEbel, Robert L. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1982
Reasonable and practical solutions to two major problems confronting the developer of any test of educational achievement (what to measure and how to measure it) are proposed, defended, and defined. (Author/PN)
Descriptors: Measurement Techniques, Objective Tests, Test Construction, Test Items
Peer reviewedHalpin, Gerald; Halpin, Glennelle – Reading Improvement, 1982
Suggests that direct and indirect measures of writing ability tend to tap similar skills. Concludes that educational decisions about competence in writing can be be made by using a combination of direct and indirect means. (FL)
Descriptors: College Students, Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education
Peer reviewedSeddon, G. M.; And Others – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1981
In a Monte Carlo simulation, a methodology was developed to investigate the existence of radex properties among objective test items. In an experiment with items covering four categories of Bloom's cognitive domain taxonomy, the items did not have the factorial properties of a radex with four levels of complexity. (Author/BW)
Descriptors: Correlation, Error of Measurement, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure
Peer reviewedDucroquet, Lucile – System, 1980
Examines objectivity as a criterion for excellency in language tests through a critical presentation of the characteristics of objective tests. This examination leads to a discussion of what the best approach to testing language might be, endorsing a combination of integrative and objective techniques. (Author/MES)
Descriptors: Evaluation, Language Tests, Objective Tests, Second Language Instruction
Peer reviewedWhitt, Elizabeth J.; Pascarella, Ernest T.; Nesheim, Becki S. Elkins; Marth, Brian P.; Pierson, Christopher T. – Journal of College Student Development, 2003
We examined the correlation between sex and cognitive outcomes of a national sample of students at four-year institutions. Outcomes data included objective tests and self-reported gains. In the presence of controls for a wide variety of potentially confounding variables, significant differences were found between women and men in outcomes and in…
Descriptors: Cognitive Development, College Students, Correlation, Higher Education
Peer reviewedHaladyna, Thomas M.; Downing, Steven M. – Applied Measurement in Education, 1989
A taxonomy of 43 rules for writing multiple-choice test items is presented, based on a consensus of 46 textbooks. These guidelines are presented as complete and authoritative, with solid consensus apparent for 33 of the rules. Four rules lack consensus, and 5 rules were cited fewer than 10 times. (SLD)
Descriptors: Classification, Interrater Reliability, Multiple Choice Tests, Objective Tests
Peer reviewedAiken, Lewis R. – Research in Higher Education, 1991
Research and practice in detecting and controlling for cheating on objective tests are reviewed and a small survey of attitudes and practices is reported. Potential of two computer programs to detect error similarities and use of multiple answer-sheet forms to control cheating are discussed. Teacher cheating is also addressed. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Answer Sheets, Cheating, Computer Software, Error Patterns
Peer reviewedvan der Ven, A. H. G. S.; Gremmen, F. M. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1992
A statistical test of the knowledge or random guessing model is presented. A version of the model is introduced in which it is assumed that alternatives can be ordered according to a Guttman scale. Three examples illustrate its application to data from a total of 590 college students. (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, College Students, Equations (Mathematics), Guessing (Tests)
Williams, Dean C.; Dube, William V.; Johnston, Mark D.; Saunders, Kathryn J. – American Journal on Mental Retardation, 1998
Two studies compared performance on conditional and trial-unique delayed identity matching-to-sample procedures with five subjects having moderate to severe mental retardation and four subjects with mild mental retardation. Across the studies, six of nine subjects showed lower delayed-matching accuracy when fewer rather than more stimuli were…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Discrimination Learning, Mild Mental Retardation, Objective Tests


