Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 117 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 607 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1401 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2570 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Guskey, Thomas R. | 30 |
| Townsley, Matt | 17 |
| Jung, Lee Ann | 13 |
| Brookhart, Susan M. | 10 |
| Johnson, Martin | 9 |
| McMillan, James H. | 9 |
| Prather, James E. | 9 |
| Blackburn, Barbara R. | 7 |
| Bloxham, Sue | 7 |
| Cheng, Liying | 7 |
| Follman, John | 7 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 468 |
| Teachers | 436 |
| Administrators | 99 |
| Researchers | 50 |
| Policymakers | 32 |
| Counselors | 25 |
| Students | 25 |
| Parents | 16 |
| Community | 12 |
| Media Staff | 1 |
| Support Staff | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| United Kingdom | 129 |
| Australia | 107 |
| Canada | 95 |
| California | 70 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 69 |
| Sweden | 66 |
| Texas | 55 |
| United States | 51 |
| Florida | 39 |
| North Carolina | 36 |
| China | 35 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedTom, Alan R. – Teacher Educator, 1974
Descriptors: Pass Fail Grading, Preservice Teacher Education, Student Teaching
Ladas, Harold – Phi Delta Kappan, 1974
The author believes grades should be awarded for achievement of stated goals -- not for attendance, effort, self-concept improvement, or conflict avoidance. In a companion article, Neil Postman offers a different view. (Editor)
Descriptors: Achievement Rating, Grades (Scholastic), Grading, Problems
Tippin, Mary N. – 1977
The speaker describes the El Paso approach to grade reports. The district has several different methods of reporting student progress. They include report cards every six weeks, an interim progress report for students who are doing unsatisfactory work or work that is not as good as could be expected, and parent conferences. (IRT)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Grading, Program Descriptions, Report Cards
Peer reviewedShia, Martha – English Journal, 1975
Why do grades have to be given at all? (JH)
Descriptors: Grades (Scholastic), Grading, Student Needs, Student Teacher Relationship
Bridgham, Robert G.; Welch, Wayne W. – J Res Sci Teaching, 1969
Descriptors: Achievement, Enrollment, Grading, Physics
Powell, Robert S., Jr. – Liberal Educ, 1969
Descriptors: Activism, Democratic Values, Governance, Grading
Sgan, Mathew R. – J Higher Educ, 1969
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Courses, Faculty, Grading
Peer reviewedLent, John A. – Journalism Educator, 1976
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Grading, Higher Education, Journalism
LeBold, William K., Ed. – Educational Research and Methods, 1976
Describes a computer program called GRADER that aids the instructor of large or multi sections in recording student test scores, combining them with lab grades or other ratings and weighing each appropriately. (MLH)
Descriptors: Computer Programs, Computers, Data Processing, Grading
Brindley, William A. – Educational Technology, 1978
A method of grading essay examinations that measures the credibility, quality, and volume of a student's answers is explained. Responses are marked either correct or incorrect and assigned a point value, using the system which is described. (Author/RAO)
Descriptors: Essay Tests, Grading, Methods, Student Attitudes
Peer reviewedDilendik, John R. – Education, 1978
Traditional grading practices are a source of anxiety and ambivalence for teachers from the elementary grades through college. The ambivalence stems from a conflict between the assumptions of traditional practice and modern educational purpose; however, criterion referenced evaluation has its own dangers. (Author/JC)
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Grading, Problems, Standards
Peer reviewedGrimshaw, James A., Jr. – College English, 1977
Demonstrates how to develop an examination on which each student contracts for his or her grade on each question. (DD)
Descriptors: Contracts, English Instruction, Grading, Higher Education
Peer reviewedArnold, Vivian – Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 1988
A study compared different approaches for teaching proofreading to high school students. The 205 participants were from 12 classrooms in 9 high schools in Kentucky. Results revealed that students who receive proofreading instruction and are given a proofreading grade perform significantly better than those who do not receive a separate grade. (JOW)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Grading, High Schools, Teaching Methods
Peer reviewedPestello, Fred P. – Teaching Sociology, 1987
Documents the process by which grades are assigned in a centrally-controlled, multiple-section course. Results of participant observation indicate that grades are determined by organizational processes instead of abilities or performance of either students or instructors. Concludes that knowledge of the rating process is essential to understanding…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Grading, Higher Education, Sociology
Peer reviewedAllswang, John M. – History Microcomputer Review, 1986
This article provides two short microcomputer gradebook programs. The programs, written in BASIC for the IBM-PC and Apple II, provide statistical information about class performance and calculate grades either on a normal distribution or based on teacher-defined break points. (JDH)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Grades (Scholastic), Grading, Higher Education


