Publication Date
| In 2026 | 1 |
| Since 2025 | 122 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 612 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1406 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2575 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Guskey, Thomas R. | 30 |
| Townsley, Matt | 17 |
| Jung, Lee Ann | 13 |
| Brookhart, Susan M. | 10 |
| Johnson, Martin | 9 |
| McMillan, James H. | 9 |
| Prather, James E. | 9 |
| Sarah Ruth Morris | 8 |
| Blackburn, Barbara R. | 7 |
| Bloxham, Sue | 7 |
| Cheng, Liying | 7 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 468 |
| Teachers | 437 |
| Administrators | 99 |
| Researchers | 51 |
| Policymakers | 32 |
| Counselors | 25 |
| Students | 25 |
| Parents | 16 |
| Community | 12 |
| Media Staff | 1 |
| Support Staff | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| United Kingdom | 129 |
| Australia | 107 |
| Canada | 95 |
| California | 72 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 69 |
| Sweden | 66 |
| Texas | 55 |
| United States | 51 |
| Florida | 39 |
| North Carolina | 36 |
| China | 35 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedMcGann, Patrick – Composition Studies/Freshman English News, 1997
Examines how assessment is constructed and understood, i.e., some of the conflicting subject positions writing instructors occupy when in the throes of grading. Suggests that "teacher selves" affect the act of grading, but so too do the subject positions of "student selves," namely, unconscious and/or superficial factors. (PA)
Descriptors: Grading, Higher Education, Teacher Student Relationship, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewedBlount, H. Parker – Educational Forum, 1997
Grades are value judgments. They are not essential for learning, and they are motivating only as an exchange medium in a system that requires them. They are not a necessary method of assessment or measurement. Grading engenders conflicts between objectivity and the humanity of teaching. (SK)
Descriptors: Feedback, Grades (Scholastic), Grading, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewedGuskey, Thomas R. – Educational Leadership, 1994
Researchers agree that grading and reporting are not essential to instruction; there is no best grading system; grading is inherently subjective; and grades have some value as rewards, but none as punishments. Types of learning criteria and practical grading guidelines are outlined, along with a brief history of grading practices since the late…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Educational Benefits, Elementary Secondary Education, Grading
Peer reviewedMahon, Robert Lee – Clearing House, 1996
Proposes a hybrid grading system for composition papers which combines numbers and letters (thus providing some objectivity while preserving flexibility) that awards points on a sliding scale (with substantial rewards for content and readability and more limited rewards for mechanics and format) and that helps students see how their papers were…
Descriptors: Grading, Higher Education, Teacher Student Relationship, Writing (Composition)
Peer reviewedMehring, Teresa; And Others – Reading Improvement, 1991
Examines the consistency of grade assignment by elementary personnel, finding wide variations. Shows greater consistency in assigning grades after training. (SR)
Descriptors: Educational Research, Elementary Education, Elementary School Teachers, Grading
Peer reviewedWeber, Alan – Middle School Journal, 1992
Provides some time-saving and purposeful evaluation strategies that can be used with various writing projects and reports. Explains 10 hints directed toward what to do while the student is still writing and 5 hints for grading writing. (11 references) (MLF)
Descriptors: Grading, Intermediate Grades, Junior High Schools, Middle Schools
Peer reviewedNemecek, Paul M. – Clearing House, 1994
Maintains that a weighted grading system may be more suitable in situations where traditional grading seems inadequate. Describes two categories of weighted systems: the multiplicative system and the additive system. (SR)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Grades (Scholastic), Grading, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewedHarkin, Patricia; Sosnoski, James – College English, 1992
Explains how a hyper-gradesheet works, and traces the chain of causes and effects from a student's performance to the establishment of a grade. Contends that such gradesheets remove the problem of the invisibility of student and faculty performances from which an evaluation is inferred. (RS)
Descriptors: Data Processing, Grades (Scholastic), Grading, Higher Education
Peer reviewedChanock, Kate – Teaching in Higher Education, 2000
Compared students' (n=101) interpretations of tutors' written comments on essays with the tutors' intent in three humanities classes at an Australian university. Found almost half the students did not interpret the comments in the way their tutors intended. Concludes that grading comments need to be carefully explained, with discipline-based…
Descriptors: Essays, Feedback, Foreign Countries, Grading
Peer reviewedDowd, Alicia C. – Education Policy Analysis Archives, 2000
Presents a theoretical analysis showing that relatively low grading quantitative fields and high grading verbal fields create a disincentive for college women to invest in quantitative study. Extends research by R. Sabot and J. Wakeman-Linn. Models pressures on grading practices using higher education production functions. (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: College Students, Females, Grading, Higher Education
Phillips, Ione D. – Techniques: Making Education and Career Connections, 1998
A Texas science academy offers a technology course in which the entire grade is based solely on a single project. Grades are based on student-made products, documentation of how they were created, and presentations before a panel of engineers. (Author/JOW)
Descriptors: Grading, Performance Based Assessment, Secondary Education, Student Projects
Peer reviewedWood, William C. – Journal of Education for Business, 1998
Describes the technique of linked multiple choice, a hybrid of open-ended and multiple-choice formats. Explains how it combines the testing power of free-response questions with the efficient grading of multiple choice. (SK)
Descriptors: Grading, Multiple Choice Tests, Student Evaluation, Test Items
Peer reviewedOverbey, Gail A. U.; Guiling, Shawn F. – Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 1999
Examined perceptions about plagiarism, correct source citation, and the evaluation of written assignments containing plagiarized material among 156 college students. Found great variability in students' knowledge/recognition of citation methods and in perceptions about best and fairest way to evaluate plagiarized assignments. Most indicated grades…
Descriptors: Citations (References), College Students, Grading, Plagiarism
Peer reviewedLawrence, Robyn; Taylor, Larry W. – Journal of Education for Business, 2000
The personality preferences and temperaments of 82 intermediate accounting students were identified by the Myers Briggs Type Indicator and Keirsey Temperament Sorter. Relationships were found between personality variables and the number of class absences, class participation, and the performance in homework and problems on the final examination.…
Descriptors: Accounting, Business Education, Grading, Higher Education
Peer reviewedLeNoir, W. David – English Journal, 2002
Seeks evaluative strategies for grading poetry that occupy an elusive middle ground between flexibility and consistency. Discusses rubrics, collections, conference/negotiation, self-evaluation, and explication. (RS)
Descriptors: Grading, Higher Education, Poetry, Secondary Education


