Publication Date
| In 2026 | 1 |
| Since 2025 | 122 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 612 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1406 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2575 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Guskey, Thomas R. | 30 |
| Townsley, Matt | 17 |
| Jung, Lee Ann | 13 |
| Brookhart, Susan M. | 10 |
| Johnson, Martin | 9 |
| McMillan, James H. | 9 |
| Prather, James E. | 9 |
| Sarah Ruth Morris | 8 |
| Blackburn, Barbara R. | 7 |
| Bloxham, Sue | 7 |
| Cheng, Liying | 7 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 468 |
| Teachers | 437 |
| Administrators | 99 |
| Researchers | 51 |
| Policymakers | 32 |
| Counselors | 25 |
| Students | 25 |
| Parents | 16 |
| Community | 12 |
| Media Staff | 1 |
| Support Staff | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| United Kingdom | 129 |
| Australia | 107 |
| Canada | 95 |
| California | 72 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 69 |
| Sweden | 66 |
| Texas | 55 |
| United States | 51 |
| Florida | 39 |
| North Carolina | 36 |
| China | 35 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedGrieves, Robin – Educational Research Quarterly, 1982
A form of indexation is proposed, in order to restore informational content to student grades. Each student's transcript would include the grade received and the average grade assigned by that instructor for that course. (PN)
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Grade Inflation, Grading, Higher Education
Peer reviewedBeale, Walter H.; King, Don W. – Exercise Exchange, 1981
Describes a contract grading system for classes in freshman composition that is designed to encourage a great deal of revision. (FL)
Descriptors: College English, Grading, Higher Education, Performance Contracts
Peer reviewedProkop, Manfred – Foreign Language Annals, 1981
Discusses existing methods of correcting essays in second language instruction and suggests an approach which takes into account both grammatical accuracy and difficulty of the topic set, permitting greater fairness and consistency of evaluation. (Author/BK)
Descriptors: Essays, Evaluation Methods, Grading, Higher Education
Peer reviewedCalabrese, Marylyn E. – English Journal, 1982
Points out the disadvantages and limitations of grading all student writing. Offers alternative methods of giving students meaningful feedback about their writing. (RL)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Grading, High Schools, Teaching Load
Peer reviewedGarrison, Roger H. – Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 1981
Outlines one instructor's criteria for compositions at each letter grade. (HTH)
Descriptors: College English, Evaluation Criteria, Grades (Scholastic), Grading
Clark, Thomas David – ABCA Bulletin, 1981
Points out that by using a cassette tape recorder, the teacher of report writing can better make a useful evaluation that explains more fully, clearly, and sympathetically how reports can be improved in both major and minor ways. (FL)
Descriptors: Audiotape Cassettes, Business Communication, Business Education, Grading
Peer reviewedRonkowski, Shirley – Social Science Record, 1979
Suggests four basic and 10 more sophisticated map evaluation criteria for use by social studies classroom teachers. The basic criteria are proportion and outline, labeling accuracy, spelling and lettering, and overall neatness. Among the more difficult criteria are proper title, all items labeled, proper areas labeled, key, coloring done neatly,…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria, Grading, Map Skills
Peer reviewedClinkscale, Bella G. – Business Education Forum, 1979
Demonstration of typewriting techniques by the teacher should be part of the instruction in every typewriting course, according to the author, who presents specific steps in conducting the demonstration, checking student performance, and grading rationale. (MF)
Descriptors: Demonstrations (Educational), Grading, Office Occupations Education, Performance Criteria
Peer reviewedNelson, Jerome L. – Journalism Educator, 1979
Presents the grading procedures of a journalism course for nonmajors, with research data to support its effectiveness. (RL)
Descriptors: Educational Research, Evaluation Criteria, Grading, Higher Education
Prentice, Thomas A. – Quill and Scroll, 1979
Discusses qualities of a good grading system; describes the development and use of criteria designed to evaluate journalism students' personal characteristics, professional development, and skills in reporting, writing, design, editing, and administration. Includes a reproduction of the evaluation form used by the author. (GT)
Descriptors: Check Lists, Evaluation Criteria, Grading, High Schools
Peer reviewedArcy, Thomas H. – College Student Journal, 1979
Some educators argue that the grade is only as good an index as the teacher who gives it. The present educational system has instilled in the public the notion that students must show evidence that they have achieved academic experiences. Grades have become the visible index of that evidence. (Author)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Achievement Rating, Grades (Scholastic), Grading
Peer reviewedBirdsall, Eric R. – College Composition and Communication, 1979
Describes a technique for increasing students' concern for the merits of their papers and for their teachers' suggestions by withholding the grade each paper receives and offering the opportunity to rewrite. (DD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Grading, Higher Education, Student Motivation
Singh, Ishwar – Educational Technology, 1979
Describes a computer program for designing tests and grading students in a college chemistry course. (RAO)
Descriptors: Chemistry, Computer Assisted Instruction, Grading, Science Instruction
Dreyer, John – Media and Methods, 1977
Grading on the basis of skills actually taught, and not on the basis of students' prior knowledge of composition, can simplify evaluation and promote learning. (KS)
Descriptors: Grading, Higher Education, Nontraditional Education, Secondary Education
Peer reviewedBresee, Clyde W. – Clearing House, 1976
Author states that: "Teachers need to be freed from any compulsion to make distribution charts and comparative judgments of pupil learning for grading purposes." Proficiency of a student in a given task or subject area should be measured without relation to success or failure of other students in the group. (Auth/RW)
Descriptors: Competitive Selection, Educational Objectives, Evaluation Criteria, Grading


