Publication Date
| In 2026 | 1 |
| Since 2025 | 122 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 612 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1406 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2575 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Guskey, Thomas R. | 30 |
| Townsley, Matt | 17 |
| Jung, Lee Ann | 13 |
| Brookhart, Susan M. | 10 |
| Johnson, Martin | 9 |
| McMillan, James H. | 9 |
| Prather, James E. | 9 |
| Sarah Ruth Morris | 8 |
| Blackburn, Barbara R. | 7 |
| Bloxham, Sue | 7 |
| Cheng, Liying | 7 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 468 |
| Teachers | 437 |
| Administrators | 99 |
| Researchers | 51 |
| Policymakers | 32 |
| Counselors | 25 |
| Students | 25 |
| Parents | 16 |
| Community | 12 |
| Media Staff | 1 |
| Support Staff | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| United Kingdom | 129 |
| Australia | 107 |
| Canada | 95 |
| California | 72 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 69 |
| Sweden | 66 |
| Texas | 55 |
| United States | 51 |
| Florida | 39 |
| North Carolina | 36 |
| China | 35 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Sgan, Mathew R. – Journal Higher Education, 1970
Descriptors: Achievement Rating, College Credits, College Freshmen, Higher Education
Rapp, Harvey M. – Research Journal (University of Maryland), 1970
Study found that forthcoming tests and grades may create conflict in students who are high achievement motivated. (RT)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Anxiety, Grading, High School Students
Blinderman, Abraham – Engl Educ, 1970
Descriptors: College Students, English Instruction, Grading, Rhetoric
Honn, Floyd R. – J Secondary Educ, 1969
Descriptors: Curriculum Development, Discipline Policy, Educational Innovation, Grading
Johnson, Ray A.; Lauroesch, William – Amer Vocat J, 1969
Descriptors: Individualized Instruction, Pass Fail Grading, Performance Criteria, Teacher Education Curriculum
Grade Teacher, 1969
Article based on interviews with several elementary school teachers.
Descriptors: Assignments, Elementary School Students, Grading, Homework
Peer reviewedMurphy, R.J.L. – British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1982
The grading reliability of the General Certificate of Education (GCE) Examinations in England was investigated by correlating GCE grades awarded to examination papers during the normal grading period and grades awarded to the same papers by a senior GCE examiner after completion of the normal GCE grading procedure. (Author/MJL)
Descriptors: Examiners, Experimenter Characteristics, Foreign Countries, Grading
Peer reviewedMoreland, Richard; And Others – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1981
The hypothesis that college students' overall level of course achievement would be related positively to the accuracy of their performance evaluations and knowledge of the instructor's grading criteria was tested. Results showed no difference in poor and good students' accuracy at evaluating the course performance of others. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Attribution Theory, College Students, Grading
Smith, Erling A. – Educational Research and Methods, 1979
This article shows how different methods of combining test scores can lead to different grade evaluations for some students. Some methods are more reliable than others. (BB)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Engineering Education, Grades (Scholastic), Grading
Peer reviewedGarrison, Bruce – Journalism Educator, 1981
Addresses questions about academic credit and grading procedures for journalism internship programs. Provides information on how one school has dealt with the issue. (RL)
Descriptors: College Credits, Grades (Scholastic), Grading, Higher Education
Peer reviewedKinnison, Lloyd R.; And Others – Teaching Exceptional Children, 1981
The article explores grading options for the teacher to consider when evaluating students who are receiving specialized education and participating in the mainstream of regular education. (DB)
Descriptors: Disabilities, Elementary Secondary Education, Grading, Individualized Education Programs
Peer reviewedIsaacs, Geoffrey; Imrie, Bradford W. – Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 1981
A strategy is described for comparing and weighting student marks on separate performance elements on the basis of statistical analysis and teacher judgment. Differences between nominal and effective weightings are discussed. (MSE)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Grading, Higher Education, Scoring
Peer reviewedWolf, W. C., Jr. – Clearing House, 1980
Salient aspects of practices associated with doctoral-level study in the late 1950s and the late 1970s are contrasted to convey the magnitude of some of the changes in program opportunities, degree requirements, student recruitment, student evaluation, and faculty competence. Implications for teachers contemplating doctoral study are discussed.…
Descriptors: Degree Requirements, Doctoral Programs, Educational Change, Grading
Peer reviewedMiller, Patricia – Nursing Outlook, 1981
Examines the University of Nebraska's experience in implementing a procedure for grade appeal hearings. Discusses the importance of the setting, the chairperson's role, faculty and student roles, committee member's bias, and interactions at the hearing. (CT)
Descriptors: Bias, Committees, Grading, Grievance Procedures
Agee, Annabel; Young, Marynell – CEA Forum, 1980
Describes a correction system that supplements and visually reinforces teacher responses to student papers by utilizing examples from those papers and emphasizing the positive aspects of the assignments. (HOD)
Descriptors: College English, Feedback, Grading, Higher Education


