Publication Date
| In 2026 | 1 |
| Since 2025 | 122 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 612 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1406 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2575 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Guskey, Thomas R. | 30 |
| Townsley, Matt | 17 |
| Jung, Lee Ann | 13 |
| Brookhart, Susan M. | 10 |
| Johnson, Martin | 9 |
| McMillan, James H. | 9 |
| Prather, James E. | 9 |
| Sarah Ruth Morris | 8 |
| Blackburn, Barbara R. | 7 |
| Bloxham, Sue | 7 |
| Cheng, Liying | 7 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 468 |
| Teachers | 437 |
| Administrators | 99 |
| Researchers | 51 |
| Policymakers | 32 |
| Counselors | 25 |
| Students | 25 |
| Parents | 16 |
| Community | 12 |
| Media Staff | 1 |
| Support Staff | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| United Kingdom | 129 |
| Australia | 107 |
| Canada | 95 |
| California | 72 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 69 |
| Sweden | 66 |
| Texas | 55 |
| United States | 51 |
| Florida | 39 |
| North Carolina | 36 |
| China | 35 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedRogers, Erleen Joiner – Clearing House, 1994
Describes a program developed at Christian County High School in Hopkinsville, Kentucky, that utilizes three different levels of instruction with two different curriculums under each level to meet the differing needs of students. (SR)
Descriptors: Curriculum Development, Grading, High Schools, Program Descriptions
Peer reviewedNewstead, Stephen E.; Dennis, Ian – Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 1990
Three studies investigating the existence of sex bias in the grading of undergraduate students, by examining interrater reliability for blind and non-blind grading, are reported. Negative evidence found in the results and the confusing picture presented by previous research indicate little firm evidence of sex bias in grading. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Grading, Higher Education, Interrater Reliability
Peer reviewedSorenson, Ritch L.; And Others – Journal of Business Communication, 1993
Examines how instructors may motivate students to improve their writing skills. Compares goal- and punishment-based grading systems for students. Tests two exemplary systems to determine their effect on students' performance and perception. Finds that, although both systems improved students' writing, they were perceived differently and the…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Grading, Higher Education, Student Motivation
Peer reviewedHobbs, Rachael – Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 1993
Discusses the practice of using a portfolio reporting system in a learning disabilities resource room. Gives several rationales for the superiority of portfolios. Provides specific examples of student work. Provides a detailed description of how to implement portfolio reporting in the classroom, including planning, selection of materials, and…
Descriptors: Grading, Learning Disabilities, Portfolios (Background Materials), Resource Room Programs
Peer reviewedMeredith, R. Alan – Modern Language Journal, 1990
Examines the use the Oral Proficiency Interview (OPI), and provides evidence that the OPI can be used comfortably for such purposes as assigning oral skill grades, especially if examiners are trained to differentiate within levels and if scores are calibrated using a graduated scale. (GLR)
Descriptors: Grading, Interviews, Language Proficiency, Second Language Learning
Peer reviewedSommers, Jeffrey – Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 1993
Uses a student essay and dialog journal entries to discuss problems raised by context in grading student writing. Encourages teachers to rethink the whole system of grading and to discuss their conclusions openly. (SR)
Descriptors: Grading, Higher Education, Student Evaluation, Student Writing Models
Peer reviewedCameron, Thomas D. – Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 1993
Describes and discusses the Rio Grande Holistic Scale (a grading scale developed at the Rio Grande Campus of Austin Community College). Notes that the scale has been so successful that it now undergirds the entire basic writing program, crystallizing student thinking about the process of writing, unifying grading criteria, informing course…
Descriptors: Basic Writing, Evaluation Criteria, Grading, Higher Education
Peer reviewedBaumgartner, Dana – Exceptionality: A Research Journal, 1993
The author of EC 607 585 discusses how parent comments on a survey concerning homework, tests, and grades of their children in regular or special education classes can reflect deeper meanings behind their forced choices. Excerpts from several surveys indicate parents' definitions of homework, the need for communication between parents and…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Elementary Secondary Education, Grading, Homework
Brudnak, Karen A. – Mailbox Teacher, 1999
Describes different types of team teaching, explaining the following: why it is popular, what teachers like about team teaching, the down side to team teaching, how to handle grading, and what parents say about team teaching. The paper presents advice from experienced team teachers and offers a resource for further information. (SM)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Grading, Parent Attitudes, Teacher Attitudes
Peer reviewedPrice, Margaret; Rust, Chris – Quality in Higher Education, 1999
Describes development and implementation of a common assessment grid for grading second- and third-year students at the School of Business of Oxford Brookes University (England). Although the grid failed to provide comprehensive grading criteria, it succeeded in other purposes such as providing students with better guidance, easier moderation, and…
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Business Administration Education, Foreign Countries, Grading
Peer reviewedMagner, Laura – Gifted Child Today, 2000
This article describes the 2-5-8 Assessment Plan, an assessment process based on Bloom's taxonomy that allows students to choose test items to complete. Test items are given 2, 5, or 8 points depending on difficulty and students must choose any assignments that total ten points. Grading the assessments is discussed. (Contains one reference.) (CR)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Gifted, Grading
Peer reviewedBaker, H. Eugene, III; Bates, Homer L. – Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 1999
Examined the overall effect of change to a plus/minus grading system on management students and faculty at one public university, using mathematical analysis of grade distribution and a questionnaire. Results indicated that both students and faculty had negative perceptions of the plus/minus system, and that the new system had virtually no effect…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Students, Grading, Higher Education
Peer reviewedWang, Chih-yen – Performance Improvement, 2000
Provides guidelines that trainers can use to make fair judgments in grading subjective essay examinations. Highlights include establishing criteria for scoring; clarifying lesson objectives; dividing each question into smaller components with weighted points for each section; developing grading guidelines; and the increasing use of computers to…
Descriptors: Computer Uses in Education, Educational Testing, Essay Tests, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewedFriedman, Stephen J. – Educational Forum, 2000
Compares guidelines on grading with actual practices, especially instances in which teachers use grades to control student behavior. Advocates classroom research and the development of consensus on fair grading practices. (SK)
Descriptors: Classroom Techniques, Educational Practices, Elementary Secondary Education, Grading
Peer reviewedHalden-Sullivan, Judith – Assessing Writing, 1996
Describes consequences of an inadvertent misalignment in grading practice by analyzing an instructor's essay evaluation checklist. Finds that, in trying to promote evaluative consistency, the checklist privileges product over process, academic discourse over students' own voices, and an analytic predisposition to student writing over an…
Descriptors: Academic Discourse, Check Lists, Evaluation Methods, Grading


