Publication Date
| In 2026 | 1 |
| Since 2025 | 122 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 612 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1406 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2575 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Guskey, Thomas R. | 30 |
| Townsley, Matt | 17 |
| Jung, Lee Ann | 13 |
| Brookhart, Susan M. | 10 |
| Johnson, Martin | 9 |
| McMillan, James H. | 9 |
| Prather, James E. | 9 |
| Sarah Ruth Morris | 8 |
| Blackburn, Barbara R. | 7 |
| Bloxham, Sue | 7 |
| Cheng, Liying | 7 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 468 |
| Teachers | 437 |
| Administrators | 99 |
| Researchers | 51 |
| Policymakers | 32 |
| Counselors | 25 |
| Students | 25 |
| Parents | 16 |
| Community | 12 |
| Media Staff | 1 |
| Support Staff | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| United Kingdom | 129 |
| Australia | 107 |
| Canada | 95 |
| California | 72 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 69 |
| Sweden | 66 |
| Texas | 55 |
| United States | 51 |
| Florida | 39 |
| North Carolina | 36 |
| China | 35 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedBullford, Harris J. – Change, 1987
By modulating course requirements, effective classroom management is able to sustain respectable academic standards while making flexible concessions to student petitions. The author's name is a pseudonynm. (MLW)
Descriptors: Academic Standards, College Faculty, College Instruction, Educational Quality
Peer reviewedOosterhof, Albert C. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1987
This module describes a method for weighting various measures of student achievement, such as examinations and home assignments, in order to combine these measures into a final grade. Standard deviation methods receive extensive attention. (TJH)
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Evaluation Criteria, Grading, Norm Referenced Tests
Peer reviewedKuhs, Therese; And Others – Elementary School Journal, 1985
Longitudinal case studies of seven teachers in grades three, four, and five were conducted to determine teachers' use of curriculum-embedded tests in elementary mathematics instruction. Results indicated that among the three ways tests are used (student placement, content decisions, and student evaluation), student placement provided the most…
Descriptors: Curriculum, Elementary Education, Grading, Mathematics Instruction
Peer reviewedGruijter, Dato N. M. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1985
To improve on cutoff scores based on absolute standards which may produce an unacceptable number of failures, a compromise is suggested. The compromise draws on the information in the observed score distribution to adjust the standard. Three compromise models developed by Hofstee, Beuk, and De Gruijter are compared. (Author/GDC)
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Comparative Testing, Cutting Scores, Mastery Tests
Peer reviewedBarnes, Susan – Journal of Teacher Education, 1985
This study examined the attitudes, knowledge bases, and practices of 20 cooperating teachers and 20 student teachers regarding evaluation of pupil progress. Teachers often wrestled with balancing district demands for grading with pupil needs for affirmation and guidance. The complexity of the process and implications for teacher educators are…
Descriptors: Cooperating Teachers, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria, Grading
Peer reviewedMarienfeld, R. Dennis; Reid, John C. – Journal of Medical Education, 1984
To determine whether the phenomenon of the lenient or easy grader exists in the setting of the clinical clerkship, the grading patterns during six consecutive years of faculty members in a department of medicine were examined. (MLW)
Descriptors: Clinical Experience, Grade Inflation, Grading, Higher Education
Peer reviewedRentz, Kathryn C. – Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 1985
Points out the disadvantages of checkmark grading. States that many students will not be able to revise their work with the help of only a few symbols on their papers and that students will set their sights as low as the grading system lets them. (EL)
Descriptors: Grading, Higher Education, Revision (Written Composition), Student Evaluation
Peer reviewedMartin, Anne L. – Babel: Journal of the Australian Federation of Modern Language Teachers Associations, 1985
Discusses the concept of graded language levels (GLL) and three distinguishing features of the Australian situation that must be taken into account when importing this concept from Great Britain. Describes the English (GOML) and the Scottish (GLAFLL) variants of graded language levels. Offers suggestions for designing a GLL package for Australia.…
Descriptors: Achievement Rating, Elementary Secondary Education, Foreign Countries, Grading
Peer reviewedKindilien, Glenn A. – Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 1986
Tells how to improve in-class essay exams by viewing them as a rough draft of a yet-to-be completed essay on which the teacher will make specific corrections, comments, and suggestions about how to improve it. Describes the grading of such exams and class discussion dealing with all aspects of the essay. (EL)
Descriptors: Essay Tests, Grading, Teacher Role, Two Year Colleges
Peer reviewedRomey, William D. – Journal of College Science Teaching, 1984
Describes the rationale for and objectives of a strategy in which students display projects in lieu of a final examination. Although no grading is attached to the "walk-through," participation is required for the course grade. Sample student projects reflecting the variety of display formats are also described. (JN)
Descriptors: College Science, Earth Science, Grading, Higher Education
Ober, Scot – ABCA Bulletin, 1984
Reports on a study of the influence of format, criteria, and the passage of time on teacher evaluations of student writing; found that a rating scale influenced stability of grades over time and higher grades generally. (AEA)
Descriptors: Educational Research, Evaluation Criteria, Grading, Handwriting
Peer reviewedBennetts, J. – Physics Education, 1984
Discusses the Certificate of Secondary Education (CSE) physics examination. Areas addressed include CSE personnel, setting and moderating papers, marking and standardization, grading, curriculum development, and the examination profession. (JN)
Descriptors: Curriculum Development, Educational Testing, Grading, Physics
Peer reviewedArey, Leslie B. – Journal of Medical Education, 1976
A historical review since 1850 of the curriculum style of medical schools in the U.S. reveals the gradual reforms in methods and priorities that took place. (LBH)
Descriptors: Academic Records, Admission (School), Curriculum Development, Grades (Scholastic)
Peer reviewedMueller, Daniel J. – Teachers College Record, 1976
Educational strengths and limitations of the mastery learning instructional model in fulfilling the functions of instruction and student evaluation are examined. (MM)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Basic Skills, Educational Responsibility, Grading
Peer reviewedSullivan, Jenny – Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 1977
Describes a method for grading composition papers which uses careful marking and individual conferences. Four sample grading grids are appended. (HOD)
Descriptors: Community Colleges, Conferences, Evaluation Methods, Grading


