Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 101 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 454 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1082 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2102 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Graham, Steve | 36 |
| Dyson, Anne Haas | 24 |
| Flower, Linda | 23 |
| Hayes, John R. | 19 |
| Graves, Donald H. | 18 |
| Deane, Paul | 17 |
| Harris, Karen R. | 16 |
| Marshall, James D. | 15 |
| Durst, Russel K. | 14 |
| Zhang, Mo | 14 |
| Rijlaarsdam, Gert | 12 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 877 |
| Teachers | 762 |
| Researchers | 88 |
| Students | 87 |
| Parents | 25 |
| Administrators | 20 |
| Community | 4 |
| Counselors | 3 |
| Media Staff | 2 |
| Policymakers | 1 |
| Support Staff | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| Canada | 91 |
| China | 63 |
| Australia | 62 |
| Turkey | 54 |
| United Kingdom | 54 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 40 |
| Indonesia | 39 |
| Taiwan | 30 |
| California | 28 |
| Spain | 28 |
| Hong Kong | 26 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 5 |
| Education Consolidation… | 3 |
| Individuals with Disabilities… | 2 |
| Kentucky Education Reform Act… | 2 |
| Equal Access | 1 |
| Every Student Succeeds Act… | 1 |
| Library Services and… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 5 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 6 |
| Does not meet standards | 2 |
Peer reviewedWetzel, Keith – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1996
This exploratory study evaluated the efforts of one sixth-grade student with learning disabilities to use voice-input technology in written communication. The major problem encountered was the inability of the program to recognize more than 74% of the boy's utterances, thus requiring keyboard correction procedures. The technology is seen to have…
Descriptors: Case Studies, Communication Skills, Computer Software, Computer Uses in Education
Peer reviewedKarras, Ray W. – OAH Magazine of History, 1996
Outlines a step-by-step process through which students can construct, defend, and test historical arguments. These include to support the claim with facts and analyze their relevance, to oppose the claim with additional facts, to rebut this claim with additional facts, and to ask for new information to test the claim. (MJP)
Descriptors: Credibility, Educational Strategies, Historiography, History
Peer reviewedRothermel, Dan; O'Connell, Kim – Middle School Journal, 2002
Presents information learned from the planning and implementation of a Writer's Academy. Describes structures for writing as well as six useful lessons learned pertaining to: (1) teacher conferences; (2) peer conferences; (3) exploring the world; (4) writing with students; (5) valuing the process and the product to address national standards; and…
Descriptors: Classroom Techniques, Middle School Students, Middle Schools, Writing (Composition)
Peer reviewedYang, Luxin; Shi Ling – Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2003
Explored the summary writing processes of six-first-year Master of Business Administration students in a North American university. Participants (three Chinese and three native English speaking) completed a course-related summary task while thinking aloud. Analyses of think-aloud protocols, retrospective interviews, and written drafts reveal…
Descriptors: Business Administration Education, English (Second Language), English for Academic Purposes, Graduate Students
A Case Study of a Teacher's Changing Perceptions of the Writing Process: The Second and Third Years.
Peer reviewedCourtland, Mary Clare; Welsh, Robert – English Quarterly, 1990
Presents a report of the second and third years of a study that describes one teacher's experience with change as he implements a process approach to the teaching of writing. Shows the development of a multistrand program that facilitates the writing development of the class as a whole. (MG)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Elementary Education, Instructional Effectiveness, Longitudinal Studies
Fedler, Clifford B.; Gregory, James M. – Engineering Education, 1988
Assists writers in getting started, organizing material effectively, and producing high quality technical documents. Uses a nine-block information matrix to provide a system of checks to evaluate the paper. Indicates that each section of the matrix can be written separately and then combined into a coherent document. (Author/MVL)
Descriptors: College Science, Content Area Writing, Proposal Writing, Publications
Peer reviewedLe, Thao – Journal of Reading, 1989
Argues that computers can be useful partners in the writing process even for reluctant or poor writers. Describes from a linguistic perspective factors that help explain why writing is a difficult task and briefly describes several computer programs which are based on such factors. (RS)
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Discourse Analysis, Elementary Secondary Education, Encoding (Psychology)
Peer reviewedRaphael, Taffy E.; And Others – Research in the Teaching of English, 1989
Examines fifth- and sixth-grade students' metacognitive knowledge about the processes of writing narrative and expository texts. Finds that creating a communicative context enhances students' awareness of audience and purpose, as well as their understanding of different aspects of the writing process. (MG)
Descriptors: Audience Awareness, Cognitive Ability, Expository Writing, Grade 5
Gunn, Cathy – Writing Notebook, 1990
Annotates (1) 28 professional books which deal with the whole language approach in the area of reading and writing; and (2) eight books to use as computer-related resources. (MG)
Descriptors: Annotated Bibliographies, Computer Assisted Instruction, Elementary Education, Holistic Approach
Hunter, William J.; Begoray, John – Writing Notebook, 1990
Presents some of the better-known models to describe the process to writing. Combines some of their common features into a framework that is useful for thinking and talking about the roles that computers may play in supporting "the writing process." (MG)
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Computer Software, Models, Process Approach (Writing)
Peer reviewedDeGroff, Linda – Reading Teacher, 1990
Comments on six points of belief commonly held by whole language teachers. Considers how computers can facilitate teaching and learning in ways that are consistent with those points of belief. (MG)
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Computer Software, Educational Philosophy, Elementary Education
Peer reviewedAu, Kathryn H.; And Others – Reading Teacher, 1990
Shares a curriculum framework based on six aspects of literacy: ownership, reading comprehension, writing process, word identification, language and vocabulary knowledge, and voluntary reading. Notes that this framework is consistent with a whole literacy approach, and includes an assessment system and provisions for accountability. (MG)
Descriptors: Accountability, Curriculum Development, Elementary Education, Reader Response
Peer reviewedFueyo, Judith – Language Arts, 1989
Discusses the inadequacies of standard conceptions of the writing process by relating the experiences of one child in a writing class. Proposes alternative ways to expand the concept of the writing process by incorporating related activities in reading, art, and drama. (MS)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Classroom Research, Cognitive Processes, Elementary Education
Peer reviewedBolling, Anna L. – Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 1994
This article describes how collaboration affects the writing process and reports on an experiment involving the use of group and individual journals concurrently in an upper-division college writing course for prospective teachers. It was found that group journals engendered more careful attention to writing performance and greater comprehension…
Descriptors: College Students, Comprehension, Cooperative Learning, Courses
Peer reviewedKau, Ina J. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1995
This article describes the experience of grade one through two students with language disorders as they put together the parts of literacy knowledge necessary for each to discover a writing process that produced readable work. Included are perspectives of how to help students make sense of the literacy code. (Author/SW)
Descriptors: Coping, Grade 1, Grade 2, Language Acquisition


