NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Back to results
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
ERIC Number: EJ1489357
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2025
Pages: 15
Abstractor: As Provided
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: ISSN-0162-3257
EISSN: EISSN-1573-3432
Available Date: 2024-07-10
Applying a User-Centered Design Framework to Develop a Remote Research Assessment Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial for Toddlers with Early Autism Characteristics
Daina M. Tagavi1; Yael G. Dai2; Natalie I. Berger3; Marisa Petruccelli4; Sabine E. Scott5; Devon Oosting6; Mya Howard7; Alice S. Carter6; Brooke Ingersoll8; Allison L. Wainer3; Sarabeth Broder-Fingert4; Wendy L. Stone9
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, v55 n10 p3417-3431 2025
COVID-19 required many research teams to shift from in-person to remote assessments, which posed both procedural and theoretical challenges. While research has explored the utility of remote assessments for autism diagnosis from the perspective of families and clinicians, less is known about their application in clinical trials. This paper describes the development of a remote research assessment protocol for a randomized clinical trial focusing on the implementation of reciprocal imitation teaching (RIT) with toddlers in Part C early intervention. This project spans two phases. For Phase 1, our team developed and documented a series of steps utilizing user-centered design (UCD) strategies (e.g., recruiting potential users, creating a prototype, engaging in iterative development) for the purpose of redesigning an assessment protocol for a remote environment. For Phase 2, we examined preliminary outcomes of the redesign process. Primary end users (assessors) rated post-redesign usability and acceptability, while acceptability was examined using attrition data from secondary end users (family participants). Preliminary fidelity of implementation was also examined. The iterative redesign process allowed the research team to refine aspects of the assessment that ultimately led to promising preliminary ratings of usability, acceptability, and feasibility, as well as high fidelity. Preliminary data suggest that the redesigned assessment appears to be an acceptable, feasible, and usable tool for autism clinical trial research and that assessors can use it with fidelity. Further research is needed to examine the reliability and validity of the assessment, as well as implementation characteristics on a larger scale.
Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Descriptive
Education Level: N/A
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Authoring Institution: N/A
Grant or Contract Numbers: R01MH122725; R01MH122726; R01MH122727; R01MH122728
Author Affiliations: 1University of Washington, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Seattle, USA; 2Florida International University, Department of Psychology, Miami, USA; 3Rush University Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Chicago, IL, USA; 4UMass Chan Medical School, Department of Pediatrics, Worcester, USA; 5University of Oregon, Special Education and Clinical Sciences Department, Eugene, USA; 6University of Massachusetts Boston, Department of Psychology, Boston, USA; 7University of Virginia, Department of Human Services, Charlottesville, USA; 8Michigan State University, Department of Psychology, East Lansing, USA; 9University of Washington, Department of Psychology, Seattle, USA