Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 4 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 38 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 132 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 12 |
| Practitioners | 10 |
| Community | 5 |
| Parents | 5 |
| Teachers | 3 |
| Policymakers | 2 |
Location
| Florida | 7 |
| United Kingdom | 6 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 6 |
| Australia | 5 |
| Canada | 5 |
| United States | 5 |
| Georgia | 3 |
| New York | 3 |
| North Carolina | 3 |
| Turkey | 3 |
| California | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Elementary and Secondary… | 3 |
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 3 |
| Education for All Handicapped… | 1 |
| Individuals with Disabilities… | 1 |
| Serrano v Priest | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedEakin, Richard R.; Long, Clifford A. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1977
A scoring technique for true-false tests is presented. The technique, paired item scoring, involves combining two statements and having the student select one of the four resultants possible: true-true, false-true, true-false, and false-false. The combined item is treated as a multiple choice item. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Guessing (Tests), Measurement Techniques, Multiple Choice Tests, Objective Tests
Peer reviewedHuynh, Huynh – Journal of Educational Statistics, 1986
Under the assumptions of classical measurement theory and the condition of normality, a formula is derived for the reliability of composite scores. The formula represents an extension of the Spearman-Brown formula to the case of truncated data. (Author/JAZ)
Descriptors: Computer Simulation, Error of Measurement, Expectancy Tables, Scoring Formulas
Peer reviewedAlbanese, Mark A. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1986
This study reexamines results reported by Angoff and Schrader regarding formula directions and rights directions for standardized tests. Methodological concerns are discussed and additional data analyses undertaken. Alternative interpretations of the data and suggestions for additional research are proposed. (Author/LMO)
Descriptors: College Entrance Examinations, Guessing (Tests), High Schools, Higher Education
Peer reviewedAngoff, William H.; Schrader, William B. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1986
Angoff and Schrader find serious statistical flaws in Albanese's index when applied to their data. After careful consideration of a reanalyses made by Albanese and interpretations, they stand firm in their original conclusion that formula scores are essentially invariant under different testing directions. (Author/LMO)
Descriptors: College Entrance Examinations, Guessing (Tests), High Schools, Higher Education
Peer reviewedGross, Leon J. – Evaluation and the Health Professions, 1982
Despite the 50 percent probability of a correctly guessed response, a multiple true-false examination should provide sufficient score variability for adequate discrimination without formula scoring. This scoring system directs examinees to respond to each item, with their scores based simply on the number of correct responses. (Author/CM)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Guessing (Tests), Health Education, Higher Education
Peer reviewedBledsoe, Joseph; And Others – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1980
Elementary teacher candidates were pretested and posttested with the Graves Design Judgment Test. Of five approaches to analyzing change, only one, a transformation of posttest divided by pretest expressed in percentage, yielded significance. The hypothesis that a sculpture workshop and field experience would result in greater gains was not…
Descriptors: Art Appreciation, Attitude Change, Design Preferences, Field Experience Programs
Peer reviewedHocevar, Dennis; Michael, William B. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1979
Two multitrait-multimethod studies were conducted to investigate the effects of two scoring formulas. The study demonstrates that tests of divergent thinking lack discriminant validity when scored in the usual manner. A percentage formula did enhance discriminant validity when originality ratings were subjectively determined. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Creativity, Creativity Tests, Divergent Thinking, Grade 5
Peer reviewedPearson, Lea; Elliott, Colin – Journal of Moral Education, 1980
Developed as part of the British Ability Scales for ages 2-17, the Social Reasoning Scale was initially based on Kohlberg's invariant moral development stages, although substantial modifications were later introduced. In its standardization, an age progression was noted. Administration procedures, scoring criteria, and an illustrative example are…
Descriptors: Developmental Stages, Elementary Secondary Education, Intelligence Tests, Moral Development
Knapp, Thomas R. – Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 1980
Supports arguments against general use of change scores and recommends the Lord/McNemar estimates of true change. Provides a numerical example illustrating the reliability problem and the problem of the prediction of true change from various linear composites of initial and final measures. (Author)
Descriptors: Counseling Techniques, Literature Reviews, Pretests Posttests, Research Methodology
Peer reviewedPenfield, Douglas A.; Koffler, Stephen L. – Journal of Experimental Education, 1978
Three nonparametric alternatives to the parametric Bartlett test are presented for handling the K-sample equality of variance problem. The two-sample Siegel-Tukey test, Mood test, and Klotz test are extended to the multisample situation by Puri's methods. These K-sample scale tests are illustrated and compared. (Author/GDC)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Guessing (Tests), Higher Education, Mathematical Models
Peer reviewedHocevar, Dennis – Journal of Personality Assessment, 1979
The Alternate Uses test was administered to 60 college students to measure originality; scores were based on subjective judgment, statistical infrequency, and random numbers. Findings indicated that either new scoring methods or statistical methods for controlling ideational fluency should be developed. (MH)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Creativity, Creativity Tests, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewedEgghe, Leo; Rousseau, Ronald; Van Hooydonk, Guido – Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 2000
Discusses science evaluation studies that seek to determine quantitatively the contribution of different authors, departments, or countries to the whole system, and suggests that different scoring methods can yield totally different rankings. Presents formulas for counting procedures, nontrivial examples of anomalies, and possible solutions.…
Descriptors: Citation Analysis, Computation, Evaluation Research, Mathematical Formulas
Pomplun, Mark; And Others – 1992
This study evaluated the use of bivariate matching as a solution to the problem of studying differential item functioning (DIF) with formula scored tests. Using Scholastic Aptitude Test verbal data with large samples, both male/female and black/white group comparisons were investigated. Mantel-Haenszel (MH) delta-(D) DIF values and DIF category…
Descriptors: Blacks, Criteria, Females, Item Bias
Peer reviewedStauffer, A. J. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1974
Descriptors: Attitude Change, Attitude Measures, Comparative Analysis, Educational Research
Tollefson, Nona; Chung, Jing-Mei – 1986
Procedures for correcting for guessing and for assessing partial knowledge (correction-for-guessing, three-decision scoring, elimination/inclusion scoring, and confidence or probabilistic scoring) are discussed. Mean scores and internal consistency reliability estimates were compared across three administration and scoring procedures for…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Graduate Students


