NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 511 to 525 of 5,593 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Michael Matta; Sterett H. Mercer; Milena A. Keller-Margulis – Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2022
Written expression curriculum-based measurement (WE-CBM) is a formative assessment approach for screening and progress monitoring. To extend evaluation of WE-CBM, we compared hand-calculated and automated scoring approaches in relation to the number of screening samples needed per student for valid scores, the long-term predictive validity and…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Writing Tests, Predictive Validity, Formative Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Michael D. Carey; Shelley Davidow; Paul Williams – Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 2022
According to creative writing pedagogies academic Susanne Gannon ("English in Australia, 54"(2), 43-56, 2019), and the Federal government-commissioned NAPLAN review (McGaw et al., 2020), NAPLAN has restricted how writing is taught in secondary schools. A NAPLAN-influenced structural approach to teaching writing has subsumed the…
Descriptors: Scoring Rubrics, Creative Writing, Writing Evaluation, National Competency Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
O'Neill, Megan; Slater, Alicia; Sapp, D. Gregory – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2018
In this article, we describe the process of turning assessment results into substantial curricular revision, report on the mechanisms we used to encourage, measure, and reinforce successes, and outline the vertical and horizontal curriculum map of writing at Stetson University. We conclude with questions we have identified along the way and the…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Writing (Composition), Writing Evaluation, Evidence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sedlacek, Quentin C. – International Journal of Science Education, 2021
Writing activities can function as powerful teaching tools in science education -- but are their benefits realised equitably? The answer may depend in part on how teachers interpret and respond to student writing in light of societal stereotypes that link scientific competence, linguistic competence, and racial, ethnic, or gender identity. In this…
Descriptors: Biology, Science Teachers, Gender Bias, Racial Bias
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lampert, Evan; Pearson, J. Stephen – Journal of College Science Teaching, 2021
The ability to read and compose original scientific literature is critical to educating informed citizens, yet may be severely lacking in undergraduate curricula. We developed a linked course offering in fall 2017 consisting of a 16-student group taking an introductory biology course paired with a first-year composition course. The composition…
Descriptors: Interdisciplinary Approach, Writing Instruction, Teaching Methods, Science Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Elliott, Jenny; Southern, Alex – Curriculum Journal, 2021
This paper outlines the processes of creating a 'Storymaker Wheel', a creativity evaluation tool conceptualised with input from a children's book author, a children's book illustrator, academics and teachers, for teachers and pupils to use to support and develop their creative writing. It documents the ways in which teachers and pupils engaged…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Writing Evaluation, Writing Instruction, Creative Writing
Öncel, Püren; Flynn, Lauren E.; Sonia, Allison N.; Barker, Kennis E.; Lindsay, Grace C.; McClure, Caleb M.; McNamara, Danielle S.; Allen, Laura K. – Grantee Submission, 2021
Automated Writing Evaluation systems have been developed to help students improve their writing skills through the automated delivery of both summative and formative feedback. These systems have demonstrated strong potential in a variety of educational contexts; however, they remain limited in their personalization and scope. The purpose of the…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Writing Evaluation, Formative Evaluation, Summative Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Gray, Pennie L. – Composition Studies, 2020
During peer review, students often exhibit resistance when asked to respond critically to their peers' writing. Most students tend to offer gentle critiques, especially when they personally know the peers whose writing they are reading. This tendency to be overly kind can be frustrating for instructors, yet there may be logical reasons for…
Descriptors: Prosocial Behavior, Freshman Composition, College Freshmen, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Truckenmiller, Adrea J.; McKindles, Jessica V.; Petscher, Yaacov; Eckert, Tanya L.; Tock, Jamie – Journal of Special Education, 2020
This study provides significant advances in the understanding and utility of writing assessment for progress monitoring writing instruction. We explored the validity of a new writing tool that asks students in Grades 3 through 8 to read and respond to informational passages. The written response is then scored for writing fluency. Results…
Descriptors: Curriculum Based Assessment, Writing Evaluation, Writing Tests, Progress Monitoring
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Erguvan, Inan Deniz; Aksu Dunya, Beyza – Language Testing in Asia, 2020
This study examined the rater severity of instructors using a multi-trait rubric in a freshman composition course offered in a private university in Kuwait. Use of standardized multi-trait rubrics is a recent development in this course and student feedback and anchor papers provided by instructors for each essay exam necessitated the assessment of…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, College Freshmen, Freshman Composition, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Do, Hieu Manh – TESL-EJ, 2023
This study aims to investigate Vietnamese students' perceptions of portfolio assessment and how it affects their writing performance. Furthermore, the study explores problems encountered during the assessment process, which could offer professional support for teachers, particularly novice teachers, when applying this formative assessment to…
Descriptors: Writing Instruction, Portfolio Assessment, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Myers, Matthew C.; Wilson, Joshua – International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2023
This study evaluated the construct validity of six scoring traits of an automated writing evaluation (AWE) system called "MI Write." Persuasive essays (N = 100) written by students in grades 7 and 8 were randomized at the sentence-level using a script written with Python's NLTK module. Each persuasive essay was randomized 30 times (n =…
Descriptors: Construct Validity, Automation, Writing Evaluation, Algorithms
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kallarackal, Angy J. – Teaching of Psychology, 2023
Background: The goals of laboratory experiences include developing knowledge base, research skills, and scientific communication abilities. Objective: The aim was to assess an inquiry-based laboratory activity using the model organism "Caenorhabditis elegans" in relation to learning goals. Method: Students in a "Biopsychology"…
Descriptors: Laboratory Experiments, Biology, Psychology, Communication Skills
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kim, Sugene – Higher Education Research and Development, 2023
This study explores Japanese students' perceptions of and experiences with peer review in English writing classes. While the benefits of peer review for second language (L2) students are generally acknowledged, some studies have claimed that students from Asian cultures are predisposed to not benefit fully from this process because they tend to…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, Student Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wei-Yan Li; Kevin Kau; Yi-Jiun Shiung – SAGE Open, 2023
Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) software has been viewed as a promising tool for assisting writing. This study integrated AWE and its combination with peer review discussion into writing practice in a large college writing class in the Asian context. Adopting a mixed-method approach, this study employed a quantitative questionnaire to…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Writing Evaluation, Computer Software, Automation
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  31  |  32  |  33  |  34  |  35  |  36  |  37  |  38  |  39  |  ...  |  373