Publication Date
In 2025 | 73 |
Since 2024 | 275 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 891 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1656 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2402 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Practitioners | 584 |
Teachers | 481 |
Researchers | 102 |
Students | 47 |
Administrators | 43 |
Policymakers | 12 |
Parents | 8 |
Community | 1 |
Media Staff | 1 |
Location
Canada | 145 |
China | 118 |
Iran | 70 |
Turkey | 69 |
Australia | 67 |
California | 49 |
United Kingdom | 45 |
Japan | 44 |
Indonesia | 41 |
Saudi Arabia | 37 |
Taiwan | 34 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 1 |
Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 5 |
Does not meet standards | 4 |
Hanson, Kelly; Yaggi Rodak, Miranda – Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 2021
This reflective essay documents the adaptation of an active-learning strategy in response to the spring 2020 global pandemic. We detail how we adapted it from its original form as an intentionally nondigital, face-to-face, team-based activity into a new, fully digital format. We articulate the active-learning methods driving the original design as…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Active Learning, Collaborative Writing, Electronic Learning
Erman Aslanoglu, Aslihan; Sata, Mehmet – Participatory Educational Research, 2021
When students present writing tasks that require higher order thinking skills to work, one of the most important problems is scoring these writing tasks objectively. The fact that raters give scores below or above their performance based on several environmental factors affects the consistency of the measurements. Inconsistencies in scoring…
Descriptors: Interrater Reliability, Evaluators, Error of Measurement, Writing Evaluation
Sahin, Alper – Shanlax International Journal of Education, 2021
There are several student performances assessed in Intensive English Programs (IEPs) worldwide in each academic year. These student performances are mostly graded by human raters with a certain degree of error. However, the accuracy of these performance assessments is of utmost importance because they feed data into some high stakes decisions…
Descriptors: Intensive Language Courses, Second Language Instruction, Second Language Learning, English (Second Language)
Benali, Ameni – English Language Teaching, 2021
It is undeniable that attempts to develop automated feedback systems that support and enhance language learning and assessment have increased in the last few years. The growing demand for using technology in the classroom and the promotions provided by automated- written-feedback program developers and designers, drive many educational…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Writing Instruction, Feedback (Response), English (Second Language)
Chakraborty, Deya; Soyoof, Ali; Moharami, Mehdi; Utami, Ade Dwi; Zeng, Shaoru; Cong-Lem, Ngo; Hradsky, Danielle; Maestre, Jacky-Lou; Foomani, Elham M.; Pretorius, Lynette – Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 2021
Objective: While academic writing is considered a core competency in academia, academic writing anxiety is ubiquitous in doctoral student cohorts. Doctoral writing groups provide a space for participants to learn from each other's writing through the peer feedback process. In this conceptual review, we explore the dialogic nature of the peer…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Academic Language, Writing (Composition), Doctoral Students
Mozer, Reagan; Miratrixy, Luke; Relyea, Jackie Eunjung; Kim, James S. – Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University, 2021
In a randomized trial that collects text as an outcome, traditional approaches for assessing treatment impact require that each document first be manually coded for constructs of interest by human raters. An impact analysis can then be conducted to compare treatment and control groups, using the hand-coded scores as a measured outcome. This…
Descriptors: Scoring, Automation, Data Analysis, Natural Language Processing
Michelle Herridge – ProQuest LLC, 2021
Evaluation of student written work during summative assessments is an important and critical task for instructors at all educational levels. Nevertheless, few research studies exist that provide insights into how different instructors approach this task. Chemistry faculty (FIs) and graduate student instructors (GSIs) regularly engage in the…
Descriptors: Science Instruction, Chemistry, College Faculty, Teaching Assistants
Ning Fan – ProQuest LLC, 2021
Articulating ideas in writing based on English conventions may be one of the biggest challenges for English as a foreign language students, which makes corrective feedback (CF) an indispensable part in writing practice. In terms of providing CF, researchers have claimed that indirect CF has a number of advantages for the improvement of students'…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, College Students, Feedback (Response), Teacher Response
Clark, Lindsay C.; Luo, Zijun; Smith, Ashly Bender – Research & Practice in Assessment, 2020
Writing support programs for students in writing-intensive, disciplinary courses are well established and take many forms, including communication centers, web-based skill development programs, and embedded writing consultants. This paper assesses the effectiveness of a program that embeds a writing grader, who assesses only the grammar of…
Descriptors: Business Schools, Content Area Writing, Writing Instruction, Writing Evaluation
Akbar, Rahima; Al-Gharabally, Nada – International Journal of Higher Education, 2020
Praising is considered to have a positive effect on learners' motivations. Yet, what to praise and how to praise is an issue of controversy. The present study looks at the effect of praising ESL learners' writing efforts in English as opposed to evaluating their writing abilities in order to test Dweck (2007) theory of praising intelligence or…
Descriptors: Positive Reinforcement, Intelligence, Academic Achievement, Second Language Learning
Bennion, John; Cannon, Brian; Hill, Brian; Nelson, Riley; Ricks, Meagan – Journal of Experiential Education, 2020
Background: Experiential educators face difficulties assessing participants and programs because there are so many measurement tools to choose from, many measures have validity issues such as those based on self-reported data, objective tests may not adequately measure social or psychological outcomes, and tests in content disciplines often assess…
Descriptors: Reflection, Essays, Experiential Learning, Fundamental Concepts
LaVoie, Noelle; Parker, James; Legree, Peter J.; Ardison, Sharon; Kilcullen, Robert N. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2020
Automated scoring based on Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) has been successfully used to score essays and constrained short answer responses. Scoring tests that capture open-ended, short answer responses poses some challenges for machine learning approaches. We used LSA techniques to score short answer responses to the Consequences Test, a measure…
Descriptors: Semantics, Evaluators, Essays, Scoring
Xu, Jinfen; Zhang, Shanshan – Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 2022
Automated writing evaluation (AWE) systems have been increasingly incorporated in L2 writing instruction. However, how the instructional use of AWE influences learners' writing has remained inconclusive partly due to variations in heterogeneous learners. Underpinned by a sociocultural theory, this classroom-based study was to understand how…
Descriptors: Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, English (Second Language), Writing Evaluation
Heidari, Nasim; Ghanbari, Nasim; Abbasi, Abbas – Language Testing in Asia, 2022
It is widely believed that human rating performance is influenced by an array of different factors. Among these, rater-related variables such as experience, language background, perceptions, and attitudes have been mentioned. One of the important rater-related factors is the way the raters interact with the rating scales. In particular, how raters…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Rating Scales, Language Tests, English (Second Language)
Taghizadeh Kerman, Nafiseh; Banihashem, Seyyed Kazem; Noroozi, Omid – International Society for Technology, Education, and Science, 2022
In this article, we aim to explore the differences in the received peer feedback among successful, less successful, and unsuccessful students in higher education. This exploratory study was conducted in online settings and in the context of argumentative essay writing. In total, 135 undergraduate students participated in an online module and they…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Peer Evaluation, Essays, Persuasive Discourse