NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Back to results
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
ERIC Number: EJ1476634
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2025-Aug
Pages: 12
Abstractor: As Provided
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: ISSN-0022-4391
EISSN: EISSN-1746-1561
Available Date: 2025-06-16
Foodservice Directors' Perceived Barriers to Student Participation in School Meals When Meals Were Served Free of Charge during the 2021-2022 School Year
Deborah A. Olarte1,2; Wendi Gosliner3; Leah E. Chapman2,4,10; Christina Hecht3; Ken Hecht3; Punam Ohri-Vachaspati5; Anisha I. Patel6; Margaret Read7; Lorrene D. Ritchie3; Marlene B. Schwartz8; Monica D. Zuercher3; Dania Orta-Aleman3; Michele Polacsek9; Juliana F. W. Cohen2,10
Journal of School Health, v95 n8 p575-586 2025
Background: School meals were served free of charge to all public school students in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic, but some students still did not participate. Methods: In this mixed-methods study, surveys and interviews were conducted with food service directors (FSDs) from California (n = 556 surveys; n = 29 interviews) and Maine (n = 43 surveys; n = 20 interviews) during spring 2022. Survey data was analyzed using multivariable logistic regression models, and interview data was analyzed using the immersion/crystallization approach. Results: Students' preference to eat meals from home or elsewhere (81.5%) and negative perceptions of the school food's taste (67%) were the most common barriers reported. Schools' prior community eligibility provision (CEP) participation and smaller student enrollment were associated with fewer reported barriers. Inadequate time to eat lunch and stigma were also reported as barriers to participation. Implications for School Health Policy, Practice, and Equity: Investments are needed to help schools partner with students to optimize school meal experiences and to improve food taste. Policies that provide school meals free of charge for all students can also help reduce negative social barriers such as stigma. Conclusions: Despite the provision of USM, barriers to participation remain. Policies to enhance meal quality and program implementation are needed.
Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Education Level: N/A
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Identifiers - Location: California
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A
Author Affiliations: 1Department of Nutrition and Food Studies, Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development, New York University, New York, New York, USA; 2Department of Nutrition & Public Health, School of Nursing and Health Science, Merrimack College, North Andover, Massachusetts, USA; 3Nutrition Policy Institute, University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resource, Oakland, California, USA; 4Center for Health Inclusion, Research and Practice, North Andover, Massachusetts, USA; 5College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona, USA; 6Stanford University, Pediatrics, Palo Alto, California, USA; 7Partnership for a Healthier America, Prince Frederick, Maryland, USA; 8Rudd Center for Food Policy & Health, University of Connecticut, Hartford, Connecticut, USA; 9Center for Excellence in Public Health, University of New England, Portland, Maine, USA; 10Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA