NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1,906 to 1,920 of 2,598 results Save | Export
Popham, W. James – American School Board Journal, 2000
Teachers everywhere are playing the score-boosting game to raise scores on mandated standardized achievement tests, although five nationally recognized assessments compare student performance instead of measuring classroom learning. Since curriculum standards are often vague and misaligned with assessments, teachers sprinkle instruction with…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Cheating, Elementary Secondary Education, Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stocking, Martha L.; Ward, William C.; Potenza, Maria T. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1998
Explored, using simulations, the use of disclosed items on continuous testing conditions under a worse-case scenario that assumes that disclosed items are always answered correctly. Some item pool and test designs were identified in which the use of disclosed items produces effects on test scores that may be viewed as negligible. (Author/MAK)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Cheating, Computer Assisted Testing, Item Banks
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sims, Randi L. – Psychology in the Schools, 1995
This study considers the severity of academic dishonesty as an important factor in dealing with academic integrity. The results indicate that although faculty generally consider specific dishonest behaviors as more severe than do students, the differences appear to lessen as students progress toward graduation. (Author)
Descriptors: Cheating, College Students, Faculty, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Johns, Sharon K.; Strand, Carolyn A. – Journal of Education for Business, 2000
In a survey of 581 business students, behavior they believed most unethical included taking a test for someone else and obtaining answers during an exam. They were less certain about studying from someone else's notes and failing to report unfavorable errors in grading. Compared to a 1976 study, current students believe their peers seldom…
Descriptors: Beliefs, Business Education, Cheating, College Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Scanlon, Patrick M.; Neumann, David R. – Journal of College Student Development, 2002
Six hundred ninety-eight undergraduates (85.9% between the ages of 17 and 23; 87.5% in the first through fourth year) from nine colleges and universities completed a survey on Internet plagiarism. A substantial minority of students reported they use the Internet to copy and paste text into their papers without citation. (Author)
Descriptors: Cheating, Higher Education, Internet, Plagiarism
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wollack, James A. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1997
Introduces a new Item Response Theory (IRT) based statistic for detecting answer copying. Compares this omega statistic with the best classical test theory-based statistic under various conditions, and finds omega superior based on Type I error rate and power. (SLD)
Descriptors: Cheating, Identification, Item Response Theory, Power (Statistics)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McCabe, Donald L.; Pavela, Gary – Change, 2004
This document is a revision of the original "Ten Principles," that were published in 1997, along with work on modified honor codes. Modified honor codes have encouraged students to take the lead in setting higher ethical standards for their peers.
Descriptors: Teacher Role, Student Behavior, Standards, Cheating
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Keller, Monika; Gummerum, Michaela; Tien Wang, Xiao; Lindsey, Samuel – Child Development, 2004
Children between the ages of 3 and 10 years were presented with a set of pictures representing a contract with bilateral cheating options between a parent and child (Study 1) and between 2 peers (Study 2). The children had to (a) evaluate which situations violated the contract when the relevant information was presented, (b) anticipate the…
Descriptors: Inferences, Thinking Skills, Children, Cognitive Ability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Murdock, Tamera B.; Anderman, Eric M. – Educational Psychologist, 2006
This article uses theoretical concepts from self-efficacy theory, goal theory, expectancy value, and intrinsic motivation theory as a way to organize the vast and largely atheoretical literature on academic cheating. Specifically, it draws on 3 particular questions that students encounter when deciding whether to cheat: (a) What is my purpose?,…
Descriptors: Cheating, Motivation, Self Efficacy, Attribution Theory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Baum, Janna J. – TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 2005
Do students know what they can or cannot do with intellectual property on the internet? Many computer-savvy kids as well as educators, administrators and parents are unclear about what is and what is not ethical when dealing with the World Wide Web. The ethical issues that accompany educational technology have become more apparent as more…
Descriptors: Values, Internet, Elementary Secondary Education, Educational Technology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
de Lambert, Kelly; Ellen, Nicky; Taylor, Louise – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2006
This paper presents the findings of two investigations into the prevalence and profile of academic dishonesty amongst students in New Zealand's tertiary institutions and compares this with findings from other studies. Staff and students report on their personal experiences of academic dishonesty and these are compared with official information…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Higher Education, College Students, Cheating
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Coalter, Terry; Lim, Chi Lo; Wanorie, Tekle – International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2007
Persistent academic dishonesty has perplexed researchers who focus their studies on why students cheat. There are limited studies regarding the faculty perspective of this issue. This study explores factors that influence faculty action when faced with dishonesty or evidence of dishonesty. A questionnaire consisting of thirty-five items was sent…
Descriptors: Ethics, Cheating, Teacher Response, College Faculty
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gibson, Jane Whitney; Blackwell, Charles W. – College Teaching Methods & Styles Journal, 2007
With the proliferation of online instruction, questions have arisen regarding the challenges of meaningful student assessment in the online classroom. This paper examines that concern using the literature and the observations of a panel of faculty experts who exhibit various levels of concern about cheating and plagiarism in the online classroom.…
Descriptors: Electronic Learning, Online Courses, Computer Uses in Education, Educational Technology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Snow, Richard; Snow, Mary – Campus-Wide Information Systems, 2007
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to elaborate the need to educate and encourage students to seek an ethical realm in which the researcher not only accurately analyses and documents a problem, but also actually advocates involvement to mitigate negative impacts. Design/methodology/approach: Geographic information systems (GIS) applications are…
Descriptors: Cheating, Scientific Methodology, Integrity, Information Systems
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bertram Gallant, Tricia – Review of Higher Education, 2007
The concept of academic integrity has been resurrected in both literature and practice in response to a perceived problem of student academic dishonesty. Most specifically, academic integrity advocates suggest changing the student academic culture to normalize academic integrity and reduce occurrences of academic dishonesty. Theories of…
Descriptors: Organizational Culture, Liberal Arts, Integrity, Cheating
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  124  |  125  |  126  |  127  |  128  |  129  |  130  |  131  |  132  |  ...  |  174