Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 60 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 374 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1032 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3023 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 248 |
| Teachers | 209 |
| Researchers | 166 |
| Students | 34 |
| Policymakers | 15 |
| Administrators | 13 |
| Parents | 4 |
| Support Staff | 4 |
| Community | 1 |
Location
| Canada | 243 |
| Australia | 163 |
| United Kingdom | 102 |
| China | 99 |
| United States | 85 |
| Japan | 81 |
| France | 68 |
| Netherlands | 64 |
| Spain | 64 |
| Hong Kong | 61 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 60 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Does not meet standards | 1 |
Peer reviewedCelce-Murcia, Marianne – Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 1990
Explores the role of grammar in language use and its pervasive linkage with discourse analysis, reconceptualizing grammar instruction as an integral aspect of communicative methodology. Related research involving tense-aspect-modality, word-order issues, subordination and complementation, special constructions, topics and themes, and grammar…
Descriptors: Applied Linguistics, Discourse Analysis, Grammar, Language Research
Peer reviewedShort, Mick – Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 1990
A review of research regarding discourse analysis in stylistics and literature instruction covers studies of text, systematic analysis, meaning, style, literature pedagogy, and applied linguistics. A 10-citation annotated bibliography and a larger unannotated bibliography are included. (CB)
Descriptors: Applied Linguistics, Discourse Analysis, Language Research, Literary Styles
Peer reviewedPynte, Joel; And Others – Journal of Child Language, 1991
The way seven- and nine-year-old French children and adults interpret ambiguous object descriptions was studied in four experiments. Results of the experiment are consistent with the Gricean approach to referential communication proposed by Jackson and Jacobs (1982), and with an extended version of the principle of contrast proposed by Clark…
Descriptors: Adults, Ambiguity, Children, Communication Skills
Peer reviewedPoyatos, Fernando – Language and Communication, 1991
A case is made for the increased study of paralinguistic voice qualifiers, which include variations in breathing, laryngeal, esophageal, pharyngeal, velopharyngeal, lingual, labial, mandibular, articulatory, articulatory tension, and objectual control. It is proposed that attention to these voice qualities has a variety of practical, literary,…
Descriptors: Articulation (Speech), Diction, Information Utilization, Language Research
Peer reviewedDollerup, Cay – Perspectives: Studies in Translatology, 1993
Lists and discusses the most prominent forms of interlingual transfer and the subtle relationships that exist between the various types. Argues that proximity and situationality are important factors which may come to play a more prominent role in future work in translatology. (HB)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Interpretive Skills, Language Research, Language Skills
Peer reviewedCameron, Deborah; And Others – Language and Communication, 1993
Discusses "Researching Language," a full-length study dealing with questions about power and method in a range of social science disciplines, including anthropology, sociology, and sociolinguistics. The discussion asks whether the balance of power between researchers and research subjects can be altered. (VWL)
Descriptors: Advocacy, Empowerment, Ethics, Language Research
Peer reviewedBecker, Lawrence C. – Language and Communication, 1993
Comments on a previous article that deals with questions on researching language, and suggests that the assumption driving the arguments contained in that article is that social scientists typically possess a power-advantage over their research subjects. It is argued that such an assumption is implausible. (VWL)
Descriptors: Advocacy, Empowerment, Ethics, Language Research
Peer reviewedFigueroa, Esther – Language and Communication, 1993
Responds to an article dealing with issues of method in researching language, and addresses the question "what is research and why are linguists doing research?" (VWL)
Descriptors: Advocacy, Empowerment, Ethics, Language Research
Peer reviewedGiles, Howard – Language and Communication, 1993
Comments to a previous article focusing on power and method in linguistic research. It is suggested that the research approach highlighted in the article has indisputable merit, but that the blueprint is vague and difficult to know when to put into practice. (VWL)
Descriptors: Advocacy, Empowerment, Ethics, Language Research
Peer reviewedHarre, Rom – Language and Communication, 1993
Comments to a previous article focusing on power and method in linguistic research. It is suggested that the previous article does not succeed in bridging the gap between moral and metasocial considerations concerning the use of knowledge and similar considerations concerning mode of acquisition. (VWL)
Descriptors: Advocacy, Empowerment, Ethics, Language Research
Peer reviewedHowe, Kate – Language and Communication, 1993
Comments to a previous article focusing on power and method in linguistic research, recognizing the admirable motives advocated in the methodology put forth in the article and suggesting the need to address additional issues. (VWL)
Descriptors: Advocacy, Empowerment, Ethics, Language Research
Peer reviewedMuhlhausler, Peter – Language and Communication, 1993
Comments to a previous article focusing on power and method in linguistic research. It is suggested that the method of empowering research subjects can go seriously wrong and that no linguistic research can be driven by ideas of empowering or disempowering alone. (VWL)
Descriptors: Advocacy, Empowerment, Ethics, Language Research
Peer reviewedRamazanoglu, Caroline – Language and Communication, 1993
Comments to a previous article focusing on power and method in linguistic research or more specifically on empowering research participants. (VWL)
Descriptors: Advocacy, Empowerment, Ethics, Language Research
Peer reviewedRickford, John R. – Language and Communication, 1993
Comments to a previous article focusing on power and method in linguistic research or more specifically on empowering research participants. (VWL)
Descriptors: Advocacy, Empowerment, Ethics, Language Research
Peer reviewedSchiffrin, Deborah – Language and Communication, 1993
Comments to a previous article focusing on power and method in linguistic research or more specifically on empowering research participants. This comment suggests that understanding research talk can be facilitated by knowing something about the larger group of speech activities of which it is but one normal representative form. (VWL)
Descriptors: Advocacy, Empowerment, Ethics, Language Research


