NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 5,881 to 5,895 of 7,093 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hamaker, Ellen L.; Dolan, Conor V.; Molenaar, Peter C. M. – Structural Equation Modeling, 2002
Reexamined the nature of structural equation modeling (SEM) estimates of autoregressive moving average (ARMA) models, replicated the simulation experiments of P. Molenaar, and examined the behavior of the log-likelihood ratio test. Simulation studies indicate that estimates of ARMA parameters observed with SEM software are identical to those…
Descriptors: Maximum Likelihood Statistics, Regression (Statistics), Simulation, Structural Equation Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stapleton, Laura M. – Structural Equation Modeling, 2002
Studied the use of different weighting techniques in structural equation modeling and found, through simulation, that the use of an effective sample size weight provides unbiased estimates of key parameters and their sampling variances. Also discusses use of a popular normalization technique of scaling weights. (SLD)
Descriptors: Estimation (Mathematics), Sample Size, Scaling, Simulation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rigdon, Edward E. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1995
This article presents a straightforward classification system that is a necessary and sufficient condition for identification of the structural component of structural equation models of the block-recursive type with no more than two equations per block. Limitations of other identification techniques are discussed. (SLD)
Descriptors: Classification, Equations (Mathematics), Estimation (Mathematics), Identification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Buczynski, Patricia L. – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 1994
Describes two strategies for assessing measures of practical fit and the goodness of fit from structural equation models. Focuses on linear structural relations (LISREL), chi-square fit index, practical fit indices, and hierarchical analyses. Includes empirical example of hierarchical model procedures used with practical and statistical indices to…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Research Methodology, Statistical Analysis, Structural Equation Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Markus, Keith A. – Structural Equation Modeling, 2000
Explores the four-step procedure for testing structural equation models and outlines some problems with the approach advocated by L. Hayduk and D. Glaser (2000) and S. Mulaik and R. Milsap (2000). Questions the idea that there is a "correct" number of constructs for a given phenomenon. (SLD)
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Research Methodology, Structural Equation Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hennessy, Michael; Greenberg, Judith – American Journal of Evaluation, 1999
Describes the integration of programmatic theory and structural equation modeling to serve as the basic intellectual machinery for designing and evaluating behavioral interventions. Illustrates this integration with the example of a program to reduce sexual risk taking. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Intervention, Program Evaluation, Structural Equation Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Green, Samuel B.; Thompson, Marilyn S.; Babyak, Michael A. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1998
Simulated data for factor analytic models is used in the evaluation of three methods for controlling Type I errors: (1) the standard approach that involves testing each parameter at the 0.05 level; (2) the Bonferroni approach; and (3) a simultaneous test procedure (STP). Advantages offered by the Bonferroni approach are discussed. (SLD)
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Monte Carlo Methods, Simulation, Structural Equation Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hayduk, Leslie A.; Glaser, Dale N. – Structural Equation Modeling, 2000
Focuses on the four-step method (four nested models) of structural equation modeling advocated by S. Mulaik (1997, 1998), discussing the limitations of the approach and considering the tests and criteria to be used in moving among the four steps. (SLD)
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Research Methodology, Structural Equation Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mulaik, Stanley A.; Millsap, Roger E. – Structural Equation Modeling, 2000
Defends the four-step approach to structural equation modeling based on testing sequences of models and points out misunderstandings of opponents of the approach. The four-step approach allows the separation of respective constraints within a structural equation model. (SLD)
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Research Methodology, Structural Equation Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bollen, Kenneth A. – Structural Equation Modeling, 2000
Neither the four-step model nor the one-step procedure can actually tell whether the researcher has the right number of factors in structural equation modeling. In fact, for reasons discussed, a simple formulaic approach to the correct specification of models does not yet exist. (SLD)
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Research Methodology, Structural Equation Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hayduk, Leslie A.; Glaser, Dale N. – Structural Equation Modeling, 2000
Replies to commentaries on the four-step approach to structural equation modeling, pointing out the strengths and weaknesses of each argument and ultimately concluding that the four-step model is subject to criticisms that can be addressed to factor analysis as well. (SLD)
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Research Methodology, Structural Equation Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Nevitt, Jonathan; Hancock, Gregory R. – Structural Equation Modeling, 2001
Evaluated the bootstrap method under varying conditions of nonnormality, sample size, model specification, and number of bootstrap samples drawn from the resampling space. Results for the bootstrap suggest the resampling-based method may be conservative in its control over model rejections, thus having an impact on the statistical power associated…
Descriptors: Estimation (Mathematics), Power (Statistics), Sample Size, Structural Equation Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Schweizer, Karl; Moosbrugger, Helfried; Goldhammer, Frank – Intelligence, 2005
The relationship between attention and general intelligence was investigated considering the different types of attention: alertness, sustained attention, focused attention, attentional switching, divided attention, attention according to the supervisory attentional system, attention as inhibition, spatial attention, attention as planning,…
Descriptors: Intelligence, Structural Equation Models, Attention, Cognitive Ability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Fan, Xitao; Fan, Xiaotao – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2005
This article illustrates the use of the SAS system for Monte Carlo simulation work in structural equation modeling (SEM). Data generation procedures for both multivariate normal and nonnormal conditions are discussed, and relevant SAS codes for implementing these procedures are presented. A hypothetical example is presented in which Monte Carlo…
Descriptors: Monte Carlo Methods, Structural Equation Models, Simulation, Sample Size
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Winstok, Zeev; Eisikovits, Zvi; Fishman, Gideon – Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2004
The aim of this study was to present and initially test a model of escalation to verbal and physical aggression among Israeli youths. Stratified sampling was used to obtain data from 799 students in the 7th, 8th, and 9th grades of junior high schools in a northern Israeli city and its suburbs. A structural equation model (SEM) analysis confirmed…
Descriptors: Junior High Schools, Correlation, Conflict, Aggression
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  389  |  390  |  391  |  392  |  393  |  394  |  395  |  396  |  397  |  ...  |  473