Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 18 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 117 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 296 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 782 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 130 |
| Teachers | 116 |
| Researchers | 20 |
| Students | 19 |
| Policymakers | 11 |
| Administrators | 6 |
| Media Staff | 6 |
| Parents | 3 |
| Community | 1 |
| Support Staff | 1 |
Location
| United Kingdom | 46 |
| United States | 35 |
| Australia | 29 |
| Canada | 28 |
| China | 26 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 25 |
| Japan | 17 |
| California | 13 |
| South Africa | 12 |
| Ohio | 11 |
| Spain | 11 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedScannapieco, Frank A. – Journal of Dental Education, 1997
Suggests that formal classroom debate presents an opportunity for dental students to develop important learning/thinking skills and can be incorporated into coursework along with other active learning strategies. Discusses debate organization, presents rules of debate used in second-year dental school classes at the State University of New York,…
Descriptors: Active Learning, Allied Health Occupations Education, Classroom Techniques, Debate
Watson, Bernardine H.; Leibbrand, Jane A. – National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education, 2010
This brief is a summary of "Increasing the Application of Developmental Sciences Knowledge in Educator Preparation: Policy Issues and Recommendations" by Robert C. Pianta, Randy Hitz and Blake West. It includes highlights and policy recommendations contained in that paper. This brief argues that teachers and education administrators need…
Descriptors: Developmental Psychology, Child Development, Adolescent Development, Teacher Education Programs
Tallmon, James M. – 1996
This is a polemic on the need to rehumanize collegiate debate. Viewed as a reform movement insofar as its primary concern is to revitalize public debate, the National Education Debate Association (NEDA) ought to be mindful of the ethical implications of its aims in the same way that a repairman fixes what is broken: by concentrating, not on the…
Descriptors: Debate, Ethics, Higher Education, Instructional Effectiveness
Hanson, Jim – 1991
Intrinsic justification in academic debate focuses on the essential characteristics of the terms in a topic. The technique, advocated by Ken Bahm, works with very few Cross Examination Debate Association (CEDA) topics. It gives rise to counterwarrants, which create more confusion than clarity, while its counterplans destroy affirmative grounds. In…
Descriptors: Debate, Higher Education, Persuasive Discourse, Public Speaking
Pfau, Michael – 1983
Noting the enormous potential of political debates to serve both the candidates and the public, this paper argues that debate procedure and format should be improved so as to achieve a more harmonious relationship between debate and politics. The first section of the paper examines the role and impact of debates in contemporary political…
Descriptors: Debate, Elections, Information Dissemination, News Media
Recapturing the Rhetorical Dimension: Debating in Campus Forums--A Symposium on Humanizing Forensics
Peer reviewedRitter, Kurt W. – Speaker and Gavel, 1974
Advocates return of collegiate debating to public forum format. (CH)
Descriptors: Debate, Higher Education, Humanization, Intercollegiate Cooperation
Cox, J. Robert – Southern Speech Communication Journal, 1975
A discussion of the problems inherent in academic debate cases based upon attitudinal rather than structural flaws. (CH)
Descriptors: Attitudes, Change Agents, Debate, Persuasive Discourse
Pratt, James W. – 1989
The existence of the American Forensic Association's National Individual Events Tournament (NIET) and the National Forensic Association (NFA), two strong and well-established national tournaments with essentially similar events descriptions, has certainly contributed to a very substantial amount of uniformity of events descriptions and conflict…
Descriptors: Debate, Higher Education, Persuasive Discourse, Speech Communication
Olson, Clark D. – 1984
The term "turnaround" has taken a permanent place among the intercollegiate debate jargon. All too often, the first affirmative rebuttalists charge "turnaround" for every plan or response they do not know how to label properly. After so many "false alarms," judges are too weary or aggravated to notice the real thing,…
Descriptors: Debate, Evaluation Criteria, Higher Education, Judges
Littlefield, Robert S. – 1988
To identify and interpret some of the attitudes toward and levels of support for competitive forensic activities on college campuses, a study surveyed the chief administrative officer at every institution identified in the Speech Communication Association's 1988 Directory (339 of the 1,100 surveys mailed were completed). Questions concerned past…
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, Debate, Higher Education, Program Attitudes
Ulrich, Walter; Howard, K. Michelle – 1985
Noting that a series of mechanical rules created for pairing and placement of judges at the National Debate Tournament (NDT) may be useful in developing a computer program to pair tournaments, this paper focuses on the methods used to pair rounds at the NDT and also looks at some pairing options frequently employed by other debate tournaments. The…
Descriptors: Competition, Debate, Evaluation Criteria, Judges
Peer reviewedSilber, Robert R.; And Others – Change, 1974
Descriptors: Debate, Higher Education, Status, Teacher Employment
Peer reviewedKlumpp, James F.; And Others – Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1974
An exploration of systems concepts applied to argumentation and causal theory. (CH)
Descriptors: Debate, Models, Persuasive Discourse, Systems Approach
Peer reviewedMatlon, Ronald J.; Shoen, Richard L. – Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1974
The survey and suggestions for improvements are presented. (CH)
Descriptors: Administration, Attitudes, Debate, Secondary Education
Brownlee, Don, Ed. – 1980
The purpose of this booklet is to disseminate limited-circulation papers relating to value proposition debating (nonpolicy argument). The six papers provide information on the following topics: the theoretical implications of debating nonpolicy propositions, criteria for evaluating nonpolicy argument, situationally guided standards for evaluating…
Descriptors: Debate, Evaluation Criteria, Persuasive Discourse, Rhetoric


