Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 8 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 29 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 68 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 117 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 37 |
| Teachers | 18 |
| Researchers | 10 |
| Students | 2 |
| Parents | 1 |
Location
| United States | 7 |
| Australia | 6 |
| Canada | 6 |
| Turkey | 5 |
| Brazil | 4 |
| Indonesia | 4 |
| Japan | 4 |
| Taiwan | 4 |
| United Kingdom | 4 |
| Pennsylvania | 3 |
| China | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Elementary and Secondary… | 3 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedLincoln, A. J.; And Others – American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1985
Nine children with Down's syndrome were compared to two groups of nonretarded children, one similar in CA, the other a chronologically younger group of similar MA. The event-related brain potential and reaction time results indicated that Downs syndrome Ss processed some types of auditory information more slowly than the other groups. (Author/CL)
Descriptors: Aural Learning, Cognitive Processes, Downs Syndrome, Neurology
Fish, Raymond M.; Fish, Ronald C. – New Outlook for the Blind, 1976
Descriptors: Aural Learning, Blindness, Computer Graphics, Electromechanical Technology
Wilder, Larry – Speech Monographs, 1971
Through experimentation with verbal discrimination learning paradigms, the author finds that learning is increased with verbal rehearsal as compared to silent rehearsal. Author suggests that unique effects are associated with pronouncing items out loud. (Author/MS)
Descriptors: Aural Learning, Learning, Learning Processes, Pronunciation
Gilbert, John H. – J Exp Child Psychol, 1970
Using auditory ensembles of sound that differed in frequency, intensity, and duration, it was found that fifth graders more easily learn stimuli that are unlike speech than those which closely approximate speech. (MH)
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Stimuli, Aural Learning, Speech
Dixon, Carmen C. – Instr, 1970
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, Aural Learning, Language Patterns, Listening Comprehension
Peer reviewedLuick, Anthony H.; And Others – Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1982
Factor and cluster analysis of the Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities scores of 237 children (6 to 8 years old) with severe language handicaps showed a clear auditory-vocal and visual-motor factor. Ninety-seven percent of the Ss had the lowest scores on auditory association and grammatic closure subtests. (Author/CL)
Descriptors: Aphasia, Aural Learning, Language Handicaps, Primary Education
Peer reviewedGoodglass, Harold – Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1973
Descriptors: Age Differences, Aural Learning, Cerebral Dominance, Children
Turner, Thomas N. – Tennessee Education, 1978
Meant to be attention-getters, the activities work on two principles: that children need an immediate and personal purpose in order to pay attention; and that listening should be an involving activity, that is, a child needs to listen in order to do something with what is heard. (Author/NQ)
Descriptors: Attention, Auditory Training, Aural Learning, Enrichment Activities
Raspanti, Sister Celeste – Elem Engl, 1970
Descriptors: Aural Learning, English Instruction, Literature Appreciation, Memorization
Peer reviewedSticht, Thomas G. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1971
Descriptors: Aural Learning, Cognitive Processes, Learning Processes, Listening Comprehension
Ramonda, Kathleen – Speech Teacher, 1971
Descriptors: Attention, Auditory Tests, Aural Learning, Listening
Peer reviewedFrith, Uta – Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1970
Descriptors: Aural Learning, Emotional Disturbances, Psychological Studies, Recall (Psychology)
Nazzaro, James R.; Nazzaro, Jean N. – J Exp Psychol, 1970
Descriptors: Aural Learning, Learning Processes, Pacing, Time Factors (Learning)
Gearreald, Karen – Audiovisual Instr, 1969
Descriptors: Aural Learning, Blindness, Braille, Correspondence Study
Peer reviewedMarcell, Michael M.; Armstrong, Virginia – American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1982
Results of three studies involving Down syndrome students suggested that the auditory-visual recall difference evidenced by nonretarded but not by retarded Ss may have been due to the differential use of information in echoic memory. (Author)
Descriptors: Aural Learning, Downs Syndrome, Elementary Secondary Education, Memory


