ERIC Number: EJ1484912
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2025
Pages: 13
Abstractor: As Provided
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: ISSN-0260-2938
EISSN: EISSN-1469-297X
Available Date: 0000-00-00
The Paradox of Inclusive Assessment
Juuso Henrik Nieminen1,2
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, v50 n4 p564-576 2025
Higher education institutions are increasingly aware of the importance of inclusive assessment, yet large-scale implementations of inclusive assessment policies and practices are rare. Why is it so tricky to design assessment that inclusively considers the diversity of students? This article argues that whilst trying to solve the problem of inclusive assessment, research and practice communities may have forgotten to pay attention to this problematisation itself. Perhaps the problem of inclusive assessment cannot be solved. In this article, inclusive assessment is theorised as a "paradox" that is organised around three central tensions: (1) Whereas assessment aims to reduce human diversity to hierarchies and categories, inclusive education seeks to move beyond such sorting systems; (2) whereas assessment relies on uniformity, inclusion builds on diversity; (3) whereas assessment is grounded in individualism, inclusion grows from interdependence. Inclusion and assessment may simply be incompatible, at least in terms of how these ideas are currently understood. It is suggested that higher education sectors may continue living with the paradox, try to mitigate the paradox, or embrace the paradox. Given that students are the ones who must live through this paradox, these issues are not merely theoretical but urgent and real.
Descriptors: Inclusion, Evaluation, Student Diversity, Classification, Higher Education, Student Participation
Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Evaluative
Education Level: Higher Education; Postsecondary Education
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A
Author Affiliations: 1Mitch and Leslie Frazer Faculty of Education, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Canada; 2Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR

Peer reviewed
Direct link
