Background/purpose: Unethical research conduct, particularly resource harvesting and neglecting knowledge holders, persists despite global regulations. Whether deliberate or unintentional, this outcome precipitates data exploitation, erosion of trust, and non-compliance among the individuals involved. The current study emphasizes the consciousness of stakeholders to mitigate exploitative vulnerabilities. Materials/methods: An exploratory qualitative research design was employed for this study. Five stakeholders were strategically involved in conceptualizing the OCAP framework and the Ubuntu philosophical foundation, presenting the concepts as a strategic framework to facilitate ethical community-based participatory research practices. The qualitative data collected through one-on-one interviews, guided by semi-structured questionnaires, were analyzed using a content analysis approach. Results: The OCAP concept represents a significant advancement in the ethical conduct of research involving grassroots communities, emphasizing ownership, control, access, and possession of any outcomes. This perspective aligns seamlessly with the core principles of Ubuntu, centered on interconnectedness, shared responsibility, respect, and mutual upliftment, as opposed to individualism. Conclusion: OCAP and Ubuntu provide a blueprint for ethical participatory research, including conduct, policy, and regulations. While researchers must adhere, it is equally essential to ensure that grassroots community members understand their rights, as such development promises resilience against potential exploitation.