Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 7 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 42 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 126 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 479 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Bianchini, John C. | 35 |
| von Davier, Alina A. | 34 |
| Dorans, Neil J. | 33 |
| Kolen, Michael J. | 31 |
| Loret, Peter G. | 31 |
| Kim, Sooyeon | 26 |
| Moses, Tim | 24 |
| Livingston, Samuel A. | 22 |
| Holland, Paul W. | 20 |
| Puhan, Gautam | 20 |
| Liu, Jinghua | 19 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Location
| Canada | 9 |
| Australia | 8 |
| Florida | 8 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 8 |
| Netherlands | 7 |
| New York | 7 |
| United States | 7 |
| Israel | 6 |
| Turkey | 6 |
| United Kingdom | 6 |
| California | 5 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Elementary and Secondary… | 12 |
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 5 |
| Education Consolidation… | 3 |
| Hawkins Stafford Act 1988 | 1 |
| Race to the Top | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 1 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 1 |
Zheng, Xiaying; Yang, Ji Seung – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2021
The purpose of this paper is to briefly introduce two most common applications of multiple group item response theory (IRT) models, namely detecting differential item functioning (DIF) analysis and nonequivalent group score linking with a simultaneous calibration. We illustrate how to conduct those analyses using the "Stata" item…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Test Bias, Computer Software, Statistical Analysis
Lee, Yi-Hsuan; Haberman, Shelby J.; Dorans, Neil J. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2019
In many educational tests, both multiple-choice (MC) and constructed-response (CR) sections are used to measure different constructs. In many common cases, security concerns lead to the use of form-specific CR items that cannot be used for equating test scores, along with MC sections that can be linked to previous test forms via common items. In…
Descriptors: Scores, Multiple Choice Tests, Test Items, Responses
Babcock, Ben; Hodge, Kari J. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2020
Equating and scaling in the context of small sample exams, such as credentialing exams for highly specialized professions, has received increased attention in recent research. Investigators have proposed a variety of both classical and Rasch-based approaches to the problem. This study attempts to extend past research by (1) directly comparing…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Equated Scores, Scaling, Sample Size
Benton, Tom; Leech, Tony; Hughes, Sarah – Cambridge Assessment, 2020
In the context of examinations, the phrase "maintaining standards" usually refers to any activity designed to ensure that it is no easier (or harder) to achieve a given grade in one year than in another. Specifically, it tends to mean activities associated with setting examination grade boundaries. Benton et al (2020) describes a method…
Descriptors: Mathematics Tests, Equated Scores, Comparative Analysis, Difficulty Level
Lu, Ru; Guo, Hongwen – ETS Research Report Series, 2018
In this paper we compare the newly developed pseudo-equivalent groups (PEG) linking method with the linking methods based on the traditional nonequivalent groups with anchor test (NEAT) design and illustrate how to use the PEG methods under imperfect equating conditions. To do this, we proposed a new method that combines the features of PEG…
Descriptors: Equated Scores, Comparative Analysis, Test Items, Background
Gübes, Nese; Uyar, Seyma – International Journal of Progressive Education, 2020
This study aims to compare the performance of different small sample equating methods in the presence and absence of differential item functioning (DIF) in common items. In this research, Tucker linear equating, Levine linear equating, unsmoothed and pre-smoothed (C=4) chained equipercentile equating, and simplified circle arc equating methods…
Descriptors: Test Bias, Equated Scores, Test Items, Methods
NWEA, 2022
This technical report documents the processes and procedures employed by NWEA® to build and support the English MAP® Reading Fluency™ assessments administered during the 2020-2021 school year. It is written for measurement professionals and administrators to help evaluate the quality of MAP Reading Fluency. The seven sections of this report: (1)…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Reading Tests, Reading Achievement, Reading Fluency
Kettler, Ryan J. – School Psychology International, 2020
This article is a commentary on McGill et al.'s (2020) article "Use of Translated and Adapted Versions of the WISC-V: Caveat Emptor." McGill et al. use caveat emptor in their title to indicate that the buyer of an assessment must be careful about the product being purchased, presumably because the seller of the assessment is not being…
Descriptors: Children, Intelligence Tests, Translation, Test Reliability
Akin Arikan, Çigdem; Gelbal, Selahattin – International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 2018
In this study, the equated score results of the kernel equating (KE) method compared with the results of traditional equating methods--equipercentile and linear equating and 9th grade 2009 ÖBBS Form B of Social Sciences and 2009 ÖBBS Form D of Social Sciences was used under an equivalent groups (EG) design. Study sample consists of 16.249 students…
Descriptors: Equated Scores, Methods, Foreign Countries, National Competency Tests
Wyse, Adam E. – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2018
A key part of determining cut-scores when performing Angoff standard setting is utilizing equating methods to place standard-setting ratings onto the scale used to report scores to examinees. This article describes three equating methods that can be employed to place Angoff ratings onto the scale used to report scores to examinees when applying…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Equated Scores, Probability, Regression (Statistics)
Akin Arikan, Cigdem – Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2019
Problem Statement: Equating can be defined as a statistical process that allows modifying the differences between test forms with similar content and difficulty so that the scores obtained from these forms can be used interchangeably. In the literature, there are many equating methods, one of which is Kernel equating. Trends in International…
Descriptors: Equated Scores, Foreign Countries, Achievement Tests, International Assessment
Setiawan, Risky – European Journal of Educational Research, 2019
The purposes of this research are: 1) to compare two equalizing tests conducted with Hebara and Stocking Lord method; 2) to describe the characteristics of each equalizing test method using windows' IRTEQ program. This research employs a participatory approach as the data are collected through questionnaires based on the National Examination…
Descriptors: Equated Scores, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Criteria, Test Items
Koch, Marco; Spinath, Frank M.; Greiff, Samuel; Becker, Nicolas – Journal of Intelligence, 2022
Figural matrices tasks are one of the most prominent item formats used in intelligence tests, and their relevance for the assessment of cognitive abilities is unquestionable. However, despite endeavors of the open science movement to make scientific research accessible on all levels, there is a lack of royalty-free figural matrices tests. The Open…
Descriptors: Intelligence, Intelligence Tests, Computer Assisted Testing, Test Items
Tomkowicz, Joanna; Kim, Dong-In; Wan, Ping – Online Submission, 2022
In this study we evaluated the stability of item parameters and student scores, using the pre-equated (pre-pandemic) parameters from Spring 2019 and post-equated (post-pandemic) parameters from Spring 2021 in two calibration and equating designs related to item parameter treatment: re-estimating all anchor parameters (Design 1) and holding the…
Descriptors: Equated Scores, Test Items, Evaluation Methods, Pandemics
Bramley, Tom – Research Matters, 2020
The aim of this study was to compare, by simulation, the accuracy of mapping a cut-score from one test to another by expert judgement (using the Angoff method) versus the accuracy with a small-sample equating method (chained linear equating). As expected, the standard-setting method resulted in more accurate equating when we assumed a higher level…
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Standard Setting (Scoring), Equated Scores, Accuracy

Peer reviewed
Direct link
