NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 2,566 to 2,580 of 5,701 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Roderick, Joan C. – Business Education Forum, 1988
The critiquing and evaluating of resumes and cover letters by business people is important to college students. They know before submitting them what employers expect. (JOW)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Job Search Methods, Resumes (Personal), School Community Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
College Composition and Communication, 1995
Presents the position statement of the Conference on College Composition and Communication Executive Committee on writing assessment in both two-year and four-year institutions. Suggests that the primary purpose of the specific assessment should govern its design, its implementation, and the generation and dissemination of its results. Provides…
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Educational Objectives, Higher Education, Teacher Role
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lynch, David H.; Golen, Steven – Journal of Education for Business, 1992
Responses of 78 of 150 business communication teachers surveyed showed that peer evaluation of writing largely consists of juniors and seniors who use a teacher-developed analytic scale to evaluate fellow students; and 52 percent of teachers consider it effective in improving writing skills and attitudes. (SK)
Descriptors: Business Communication, College Students, Higher Education, Peer Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Black, Kathy – Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 1992
Describes a method of providing students with oral feedback to their written assignments on cassette tapes in a business communication class. (SR)
Descriptors: Audiotape Cassettes, Business Communication, Higher Education, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bosley, Deborah S. – Technical Communication, 1990
Describes a process for evaluating technical writing students who are working in groups. Discusses task sheets, progress reports, evaluation forms, and the final individual evaluation. (PRA)
Descriptors: Collaborative Writing, Higher Education, Student Evaluation, Teaching Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stevens, Kevin T.; And Others – Journal of Business Communication, 1992
Suggests that readability formulas are methodologically flawed and inappropriate measures of the readability of materials written for adults. Argues that the cloze procedure is preferable because it assesses the readability of material by its intended audience. Notes that possible users of the cloze procedure include school systems, government…
Descriptors: Adults, Audience Awareness, Business Communication, Cloze Procedure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Blynt, Ruth Ann – English Journal, 1992
Maintains that putting a number or letter grade on student writing is fundamentally wrong. Argues that trashing the traditional grading system is the best thing that could be done to ensure better reading and writing among students. (SR)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Grades (Scholastic), Grading, Student Improvement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McGarry, Carol – Technical Communication: Journal of the Society for Technical Communication, 1994
Discusses aspects of collaborative writing in the workplace, including styles of management and collaboration; deciding whether to adopt a collaborative approach; research and implementation; collaboration in process; and evaluation, recognition, and rewards. (SR)
Descriptors: Administrative Organization, Collaborative Writing, Organizational Change, Technical Writing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Isakson, Marne B. – Journal of Reading, 1991
Describes a natural student writing evaluation method in which students write letters to their teacher about their reading. Shows examples of letters from four typical students. Speculates on the function of the letters for each student. (RS)
Descriptors: Case Studies, High Schools, Letters (Correspondence), Reading Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Spivey, Nancy Nelson – Research in the Teaching of English, 1991
Examines writers' options in organizing comparisons. Finds that chunking of content in a systematic way is a strong predictor of holistic quality ratings, and that higher rated papers tend to be written by students with higher verbal abilities and more extensive topic knowledge. Demonstrates the complexity of the choices writers must make in…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Text Structure, Writing (Composition), Writing Evaluation
Greene, Maxine – Quarterly of the National Writing Project and the Center for the Study of Writing and Literacy, 1992
Asserts that educators should consider the contexts of a deeply troubled society when viewing evaluation and teaching. Argues that thinking in terms of discrete testable skills can prevent students from taking responsibility for their own learning. Argues that teachers should seek modes of evaluation which reaffirm that dignity is of concern along…
Descriptors: Secondary Education, Social Influences, Student Attitudes, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Spencer, Sharon L.; Fitzgerald, Jill – Journal of Reading Behavior, 1993
Investigates convergent and divergent validity of inferences from selected measures of structure, coherence, and quality for compositions. Finds (1) strong support for validity of inferences from the structure measures, serious questions of inferences from coherence measures, and weak support for quality measures; (2) some evidence for the…
Descriptors: Coherence, Intermediate Grades, Student Evaluation, Text Structure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Appleman, Deborah; Green, Douglas E. – College Composition and Communication, 1993
Discusses and tries to define the basic differences between high school and college-level writing. Examines key assumptions of the Summer Writing Program at Carleton College along with the criteria used for determining whether students should receive writing course credit. Reveals contradictions in stated criteria and praxis. (HB)
Descriptors: English Instruction, Freshman Composition, High Schools, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Italia, Paul G. – Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 1991
Describes the attempts of the Writing Task Force to shape an English-as-a-Second-Language (ESL) writing curriculum model at the City University of New York. (PRA)
Descriptors: Curriculum Development, English (Second Language), Two Year Colleges, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Howard, Rebecca Moore – Journal of Teaching Writing, 1992
Provides analysis of the term "plagiarism" and distinguishes it from other ways students might employ sources. Defines a form of source usage called "patchwriting" that relies heavily on summary and which should be acceptable to writing teachers. Weighs the pros and cons of summary writing. (HB)
Descriptors: English Curriculum, English Instruction, Higher Education, Plagiarism
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  168  |  169  |  170  |  171  |  172  |  173  |  174  |  175  |  176  |  ...  |  381