NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 3,271 to 3,285 of 5,701 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McCulley, George A. – Research in the Teaching of English, 1985
Using a random sample of 493 persuasive papers written by 17-year-olds during the 1978-79 National Assessment of Educational Progress writing evaluation, a study investigated the relationships among features of textual cohesion and primary trait assessments of writing quality and coherence, with manuscript length held statistically constant. (HOD)
Descriptors: Coherence, Cohesion (Written Composition), High School Seniors, Persuasive Discourse
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Donlan, Dan – English Journal, 1986
Outlines research done by teachers on writing apprehension and concludes that teachers are natural researchers because they continually pose questions about the nature of their students and the effectiveness of their teaching. (SRT)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Teacher Researchers, Writing Apprehension, Writing Difficulties
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bamberg, Betty – Research in the Teaching of English, 1984
Describes a study that developed a valid method of assessing coherence based on current linguistic theory and discourse analysis that was then used to reanalyze the "Describe" essays written by 13- and 17-year-old students for the 1969, 1973-74, and 1978-79 NAEP assessments. (HOD)
Descriptors: Coherence, Cohesion (Written Composition), Discourse Analysis, Essays
Norman, Rose; Young, Marynell – Technical Writing Teacher, 1985
Presents a sequence of assignments that provides an inductive method for preparing students to write a formal proposal by imitating the grant review and proposal process. Describes the process and results of peer review of the resulting proposals.(HTH)
Descriptors: Grants, Higher Education, Peer Evaluation, Program Proposals
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fischer, Olga Howard; Fischer, Chester A. – Journal of Teaching Writing, 1985
Relates how a microcomputer with word processing capabilities can facilitate and enrich a student's writing. (HOD)
Descriptors: Educational Technology, Higher Education, Microcomputers, Prewriting
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Zamel, Vivian – TESOL Quarterly, 1985
Describes a study that examines the responses of teachers of English as a second language (ESL) to student writing. Results show that the ESL teachers misread student texts, are inconsistent in their reactions, make arbitrary comments and corrections, impose abstract rules and standards, and rarely offer specific strategies for revising the test.…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Error Analysis (Language), Higher Education, Second Language Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McKensie, Lee; Tomkins, Gail E. – Journal of Teaching Writing, 1984
Demonstrates how an integrated approach toward writing evaluation works at each stage of the writing process and presents a checklist teachers can use to assess whether their students use specific behaviors of the writing process as they compose. (FL)
Descriptors: Educational Theories, Elementary Secondary Education, Higher Education, Integrated Activities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Jobst, Jack – Journal of Teaching Writing, 1984
Describes how microcomputers can assist in grading the work of beginning writers, especially repetitive errors, and how students respond to this practice. (FL)
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Content Area Writing, Elementary Secondary Education, Grading
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Brown, Rexford – English Education, 1984
Offers personal reflections on the testing of writing, concluding that teachers make wide and effective use of a variety of test types. (FL)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Norm Referenced Tests, Standardized Tests, Teacher Made Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Purves, Alan C. – College Composition and Communication, 1984
Describes a replication of a study to determine what international writers and evaluators bring to their respective tasks in an effort to devise an international scoring scheme. A satisfactory list of rating criteria was developed, although the criteria were value-laden and thus embedded in a cultural context. (HTH)
Descriptors: Cultural Differences, Cultural Influences, Evaluation Criteria, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Roemer, Kenneth M. – College English, 1984
Advocates modeling as an appropriate approach to teaching composition, provided teachers select models carefully and present them as paradigms of dynamic processes and as hints leading to avenues of discovery. Uses N. Scott Momaday's "The Way to Rainy Mountain" to illustrate how such a model can be used to assist student invention. (RBW)
Descriptors: College English, Higher Education, Models, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Comber, Barbara – English in Australia, 1983
Provides a description of how nongraded, descriptive assessment works in responding to the written assignments of some postgraduate students. (HOD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Feedback, Nongraded Student Evaluation
Brown, Jane Lightcap – Curriculum Review, 1984
Advantages of peer evaluation of writing are outlined, questions that arise once instructors decide to use this method are presented, and steps to develop students' awareness of what to look for and what to say about the writing of peers in English composition and other disciplines are discussed. (MBR)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Peer Evaluation, Secondary Education, Student Writing Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fahnestock, Jeanne – College Composition and Communication, 1983
Examines coherence between sentences in a paragraph, arguing that readers require coherence at this level as well as between paragraphs. Discusses continuative and discontinuative relationships between sentences, including (1) sequence, (2) exemplification, (3) addition, (4) replacement, (5) contrast, and (6) alternation. (HTH)
Descriptors: Coherence, Cohesion (Written Composition), Higher Education, Paragraph Composition
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rafoth, Bennett A.; Rubin, Donald L. – Written Communication, 1984
Concludes that mechanics had a greater influence on raters' judgments of student writing than either content or rating instructions. Findings suggest that evaluators may not be able to focus on individual criteria of writing quality. (FL)
Descriptors: Content Analysis, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Needs, Grammar
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  215  |  216  |  217  |  218  |  219  |  220  |  221  |  222  |  223  |  ...  |  381