Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 117 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 607 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1634 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 4078 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 571 |
| Teachers | 358 |
| Researchers | 135 |
| Administrators | 119 |
| Students | 51 |
| Policymakers | 46 |
| Counselors | 31 |
| Community | 24 |
| Parents | 13 |
| Support Staff | 3 |
| Media Staff | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| Australia | 207 |
| Canada | 190 |
| United Kingdom | 163 |
| United States | 117 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 106 |
| California | 97 |
| Netherlands | 76 |
| China | 69 |
| Sweden | 68 |
| Taiwan | 65 |
| Israel | 64 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Does not meet standards | 3 |
Peer reviewedLawrence, Randee Lipson – New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2002
Cohort groups in adult and higher education develop skills in communicating, accountability, respect, conflict resolution, and commitment. Through collaborative and experiential learning, learning cohorts foster the development of collective knowledge. (Contains 14 references.) (SK)
Descriptors: Adult Education, Adult Learning, Group Dynamics, Higher Education
Peer reviewedJeris, Laurel – Lifelong Learning in Europe, 2003
Two organizational problem situations were worked on by 61 teams in 4 conditions: (1) controls, (2) traditional process (goal clarity, commitment, decision making), (3) team learning (assumption surfacing, dialog, reflection), and (4) combined 2 and 3. Team learning produced significantly more double-loop learning. Controls achieved more…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Decision Making, Group Dynamics, Problem Solving
Peer reviewedSavicki, Victor; Kelley, Merle; Ammon, Benjamin – Computers in Human Behavior, 2002
Investigates group gender composition and communication styles in small task groups involved in computer-mediated communication. Describes a study that tried to train small task groups in the use of one communication style and suggests further research in the area of communication training for online task groups. (Author/LRW)
Descriptors: Computer Mediated Communication, Gender Issues, Group Dynamics, Research Needs
Peer reviewedDi Salvo, Vincent S.; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1989
Generated typology of accounts of specific behaviors that cause problems and prevent successful work group meetings. Administered self-reports to participants (N=569). Found problems stemmed from ineffective interpersonal communication skills even though participants attributed problems to task and structural difficulties in premeeting phase.…
Descriptors: Critical Incidents Method, Group Dynamics, Interpersonal Communication, Meetings
Peer reviewedChilders, John H., Jr.; Couch, R. David – Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 1989
Identifies nine myths prospective members frequently hold regarding group counseling. Discusses four leader strategies for challenging these myths: using a pregroup interview; providing factual information; group conceptual-low intensity responses; and group structural-low intensity responses. Concludes that leader may use these strategies singly…
Descriptors: Counseling Techniques, Group Counseling, Group Dynamics, Groups
Peer reviewedEvans, Colin; Palmer, Barry – Studies in Higher Education, 1989
An inter-group exercise, a form of the experiential model for studying higher education, is described. A further adaptation called "serious play" is also examined. The nature of the findings of research using these approaches is discussed, and the whole research process is outlined, including dissemination and implementation. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Educational Research, Group Dynamics, Higher Education, Models
Peer reviewedMeyers, Renee A. – Communication Monographs, 1989
Describes the Persuasive Arguments Theory (PAT), a noninteractional theory of group decision-making that predicts postdiscussion shifts from prediscussion cognitive arguments, elaborates on it, and advances two models to test the PAT perspective on argument. Finds the second model demonstrates superior predictive ability to the PAT model at some…
Descriptors: Decision Making, Group Dynamics, Higher Education, Models
Parise, James; Culp, William – Gifted Child Today (GCT), 1988
The article describes a 14-week program (one hour per week) of the Punxsutawney (Pennsylvania) schools in which 29 gifted high school students learned and practiced fundamentals of small group dynamics to enhance their leadership abilities. (DB)
Descriptors: Gifted, Group Dynamics, Group Experience, High Schools
Burns, Greg – Training and Development, 1995
Expert facilitators combine both diagnostic and intervention skills in eight domains: group development, goals, roles, communication, meeting management, decision making, problem solving, and conflict management. Most people can develop group facilitation skills. (SK)
Descriptors: Communication Skills, Conflict Resolution, Group Dynamics, Interpersonal Competence
Peer reviewedMcCrimmon, Mitch – Journal of Management Development, 1995
Criticizes Belbin's team role theory on the basis that roles are appropriate only in static organizations. Argues that most teams have no set roles and members interchange them. Suggests that all team members be trained to manage teamwork effectively. (SK)
Descriptors: Creativity, Group Dynamics, Organizational Change, Role
Peer reviewedVermette, Paul J. – Clearing House, 1995
Offers and discusses eight suggestions for secondary teachers who plan on giving cooperative learning a fair trial: (1) start slow, start short; (2) design clear activities; (3) make each student accountable; (4) monitor the groups; (5) identify teams as mixtures of strengths; (6) use grades wisely; (7) use teams every day; and (8) leave teams…
Descriptors: Cooperative Learning, Group Dynamics, Secondary Education, Teacher Student Relationship
Katzenbach, Jon R.; Smith, Douglas K. – Harvard Business Review, 1993
Teams share commitment, translate purpose into performance goals, and have members be accountable with and to their teammates. Types of teams are those that recommend, make or do things, and run things. The distinction between teams and other working groups is performance: an effective team is worth more than the sum of its parts. (SK)
Descriptors: Goal Orientation, Group Dynamics, Interprofessional Relationship, Job Performance
Peer reviewedKivlighan, Dennis M., Jr.; And Others – Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1993
Examined relationship between realistic, interpersonal, and here-and-now agendas and group members' in-session behavior and outcome among 24 college students in established personal growth groups. Found that group members who set here-and-now session agendas enacted more in-group intimate behaviors and had better outcomes than did members in…
Descriptors: College Students, Group Counseling, Group Dynamics, Higher Education
Peer reviewedLichtenberg, James W.; Knox, Pamela L. – Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1991
Analyzed structure of social interaction within four therapy groups in terms of conditional responding of participants. Proposed that groups' interactions would show increasing structure across sessions. Findings showed no consistent pattern of group development, that frequency with which members spoke was inversely related to dominance in group,…
Descriptors: Group Behavior, Group Dynamics, Group Therapy, Participation
Peer reviewedZimpfer, David G. – Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 1991
Lists 19 new publications in group work and reviews 7 of these. Publications reviewed focus on group counseling and group psychotherapy, structured groups, training groups, and group dynamics. (Author)
Descriptors: Group Counseling, Group Dynamics, Group Therapy, Groups


