Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 54 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 318 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 696 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1562 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 313 |
| Administrators | 215 |
| Policymakers | 106 |
| Researchers | 62 |
| Teachers | 25 |
| Students | 10 |
| Media Staff | 9 |
| Support Staff | 7 |
| Community | 4 |
| Counselors | 3 |
| Parents | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| United Kingdom | 109 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 84 |
| Australia | 76 |
| United States | 69 |
| Canada | 66 |
| China | 58 |
| California | 54 |
| Sweden | 51 |
| Netherlands | 45 |
| Germany | 35 |
| Spain | 34 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Does not meet standards | 1 |
Front Range Community Coll., Westminster, CO. – 2000
This report discusses various quality indicators for Front Range Community College (Colorado). Each of the 10 quality indicators and 10 additional indicators shown in the report is elaborated by details such as indicator description, operational definition, benchmark, source, results, and conclusion. Quality indicators include: (1) Student success…
Descriptors: Accountability, Benchmarking, Community Colleges, Educational Indicators
South Texas Community Coll., McAllen. Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness. – 2000
The report summarizes the preliminary findings from the Institutional Self-Study Follow-Up Survey of the faculty, administrators, staff, and students at South Texas Community College (STCC). The follow-up study was intended to address areas that were found to be of sufficient concern in the committee reports of the original Self-Study Survey as to…
Descriptors: College Planning, Community Colleges, Institutional Evaluation, Institutional Research
PDF pending restorationMaryland Higher Education Commission, 2004
The Commission staff reviewed the institutional performance accountability reports submitted by each public college and university and prepared a consolidated report. This report appears in two volumes. Volume 1 contains the following: (1) an overview of the history and major features of the accountability process; (2) the assessment of the…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Costs, Cost Effectiveness, Community Colleges
Peer reviewedMillard, Richard M.; And Others – Change, 1983
Three articles on accreditation by Richard M. Millard, Robert A. Scott, and David E. Sumler cover ensuring the quality of programs and institutions, the accreditation process and what accreditation is needed by higher education institutions, and the cooperation between the Maryland state agency and a regional accreditation body. (MLW)
Descriptors: Accreditation (Institutions), Accrediting Agencies, Agency Role, Case Studies
Peer reviewedNeroda, Ed; Bodewin, Lana – Journal of Academic Librarianship, 1983
Description of scheme to assist librarians in defining conditions which enhance professional development in academic institutions highlights definition of professional goals, institutional parameters, library parameters, departmental and job considerations, research potential (climate, time element, funding opportunities, assistance and…
Descriptors: Academic Libraries, Higher Education, Institutional Characteristics, Institutional Evaluation
Peer reviewedAdelman, Clem; Alexander, Robin – Higher Education Review, 1982
Questions and decisions made during institutional review are not equally significant to all parties. Methods and criteria are important to the accreditors; focus, dissemination, and application of results are important to administrators. There must be consistent policy for control of the process for all evaluation decisions. (MSE)
Descriptors: Accreditation (Institutions), Accrediting Agencies, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Armstrong, Robert L. – North Central Association Quarterly, 1982
Reports on a study conducted by the North Central Association to determine the perceptions of professional certified high school personnel with regard to the intangible costs and benefits of accreditation, the value of the self-study process, and time investments of professional participants in the accreditation process. Includes sample…
Descriptors: Accreditation (Institutions), Accrediting Agencies, Cost Effectiveness, Institutional Evaluation
Peer reviewedSloper, D. W. – Higher Education, 1982
The institutional and social context of higher education within which institutional evaluation is being increasingly formalized is examined, and the incidence of review at three Australian universities is analyzed for: evaluation frequency, composition of evaluation teams, and use of the resulting report. Institutional policy statements are…
Descriptors: College Role, Foreign Countries, Higher Education, Institutional Evaluation
Guardo, Carol J. – CASE Currents, 1982
The role of the academic leaders of the university is to articulate and implement the mission; the role of the development and public relations staff is to assess the image and address the market. A coherent definition of institutional identity is needed, and all constituencies must be able to identify and accept the academic mission of a…
Descriptors: Administrators, College Administration, College Faculty, College Role
Peer reviewedPalmer, Jim – Community Services Catalyst, 1983
Presents abstracts of a sample of ERIC documents dealing with community surveys. Covers a labor pool resource survey; community needs assessment surveys; a community needs follow-up; and surveys of community attitudes toward a college's delivery systems and programs and toward continuing education. (DMM)
Descriptors: Annotated Bibliographies, Community Colleges, Community Needs, Community Surveys
Peer reviewedKells, H. R. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 1981
Most assessment efforts suffer from being externally imposed on reluctant institutions. Factors that appear to influence the effectiveness of the various kinds of assessment attempts, their purpose and design, and their relationship to the ongoing health and prospects for institutions are discussed. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: Change Strategies, College Planning, Educational Objectives, Higher Education
Romney, L. C.; And Others – International Journal of Institutional Management in Higher Education, 1979
The process of institutional performance assessment in higher education carries with it potential liabilities and warrants careful consideration. The political, methodological, economic, and philosophical cautions to be considered are described and procedures for effectively dealing with these issues are suggested. (Author/JMD)
Descriptors: College Administration, Educational Assessment, Educational Problems, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedTreadway, Douglas M. – New Directions for Student Services, 1979
Student and faculty perceptions of the campus environment as elicited from ecosystem surveys can be a powerful positive influence upon leadership, especially during periods of organizational change or development. (Author)
Descriptors: Campuses, College Students, Ecology, Educational Environment
Armstrong, Robert L. – North Central Association Quarterly, 1981
Describes a study conducted to assess the quality of institutional self-evaluation as perceived by accreditation team members visiting 11 Arizona high schools during 1978-1979. The effect of consultative assistance on school self-evaluations and the different perceptions of public school and university team members are examined. (JP)
Descriptors: Accreditation (Institutions), Accrediting Agencies, Consultation Programs, Evaluators
Jacobson, Harvey K. – New Directions for Institutional Advancement, 1978
The importance of evaluation for institutional development is discussed from the perspective of the manager. It is suggested that the higher education manager can use evaluation to obtain feedback about program effort, performance, and effects that will aid in the decision-making process. (Author/SF)
Descriptors: Administration, College Administration, Development, Evaluation Methods


