Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 4 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 22 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 225 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Piland, William E. | 13 |
| Wentling, Tim L. | 13 |
| Alkin, Marvin C. | 9 |
| Stufflebeam, Daniel L. | 8 |
| Kean, Michael H. | 7 |
| Popham, W. James | 6 |
| Herman, Joan | 5 |
| Sanders, James R. | 5 |
| Scriven, Michael | 5 |
| Stake, Robert E. | 5 |
| Craig, James R. | 4 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 133 |
| Policymakers | 83 |
| Researchers | 57 |
| Administrators | 41 |
| Teachers | 30 |
| Parents | 3 |
| Community | 2 |
| Counselors | 2 |
| Media Staff | 1 |
| Support Staff | 1 |
Location
| Canada | 26 |
| California | 23 |
| Illinois | 20 |
| Australia | 15 |
| United States | 13 |
| Florida | 10 |
| United Kingdom | 10 |
| Michigan | 9 |
| New York | 8 |
| Pennsylvania | 8 |
| North Carolina | 7 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedCoufal, James E.; Hines, Edward R. – Planning and Changing, 1976
If faculty do not advocate the adoption of a systematic, objective faculty evaluation system, they must stand accused of operating with a set of double standards. (Author/IRT)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Needs, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewedLange, Robert R. – Theory Into Practice, 1974
This article is an overview of current thinking in evaluation. The evaluation frameworks of Scriven, Provus, Stake, Guba, and Stufflebeam are discussed. (HD)
Descriptors: Accountability, Educational Assessment, Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Baker, Rex – Educational Broadcasting International, 1973
Author examines uniformity in broadcast teaching and suggests that an objective criteria is needed in order to deal with problems of subjective evaluations. (HB)
Descriptors: Educational Television, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Needs, Measurement Techniques
Deeds, Roy R. – Journal of Business Education, 1973
Descriptors: Business Education, Critical Thinking, Educational Needs, Educational Problems
Alkin, Marvin C.; Churchman, David – Educational Technology, 1972
Descriptors: Educational Administration, Educational Needs, Educational Objectives, Evaluation Methods
Tennyson, Robert D.; Merrill, M. David – Educational Technology, 1971
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Needs, Instructional Systems, Learning Theories
Costa, Arthur L. – Thrust for Education Leadership, 1972
Article describes one county's efforts to comply with California's Stull Bill, and rethink educational evaluation in terms of outcomes. (SP)
Descriptors: County Programs, Evaluation Needs, Evaluative Thinking, Learning Experience
Peer reviewedLewis, Brian N. – British Journal of Educational Technology, 1972
Descriptors: Course Evaluation, Evaluation Needs, Higher Education, Home Study
Moore, T. J.; Neal, W. D. – J Educ Admin, 1969
Presents the results of a teacher evaluation research project in Australia. (LN)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Needs, Foreign Countries
Allison, Clay – Compact, 1972
Describes the personnel and functions of the National Assessment Program Analysis Advisory Committee. (JF) Aspect of National Assessment (NAEP) dealt with in this document: Program Description.
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Educational Quality, Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Frimmer, Irene – Audiovisual Instruction, 1971
"Examined here are some of the negative aspects of industry service to the schools gathered from talking to media specialists all over the country during many years of experience in the field." (Editor)
Descriptors: Business Responsibility, Consumer Economics, Equipment Manufacturers, Evaluation Needs
Peer reviewedStufflebeam, Daniel L. – Journal of Research and Development in Education, 1971
Analysis supports the theory that the CIPP Evaluation Model provides both proactive support for decision making and retroactive support for accountability. (Author)
Descriptors: Accountability, Comparative Analysis, Decision Making, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedSeligman, Clive; Hutton, R. Bruce – Journal of Social Issues, 1981
Explores the problems involved in conducting program evaluation in the field of energy conservation. Highlights similarities between evaluation research and basic research. Examines stages of evaluation research within the context of energy conservation programs and argues that experimental evaluations are desirable and feasible. (Author/MK)
Descriptors: Energy Conservation, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Needs, Program Evaluation
Feletti, Grahame I.; Fisher, Lawrence A. – Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 1979
Describes the systematic program developed by the faculty of medicine at the University of Newcastle (Australia) for the evaluation of the effectiveness, efficiency, and acceptability of its educational endeavors. Evaluation needs, process, and constraints are discussed, as well as the specific tasks required at the University. (Author/JD)
Descriptors: Curriculum Evaluation, Evaluation Needs, Medical Education, Medical Schools
Peer reviewedGebhardt, Mary E. – Evaluation and the Health Professions, 1980
Health educators should learn qualitative evaluation methods such as observation, interviewing, fieldwork, and analysis of the political and social milieu. The traditional scientific method is questionable because it often fails to discover significant differences. (CP)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Needs, Health Education, Informal Assessment


