NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 6,151 to 6,165 of 10,006 results Save | Export
Manchester Metropolitan Univ. (England). – 2002
This issues paper, seventh in a series of eight, is intended to distill formative evaluation questions on topics that are central to the development of the higher and further education information environment in the United Kingdom. The aim of this issues paper is to provide a description of the approach of the Formative Evaluation of the…
Descriptors: Change, Electronic Classrooms, Foreign Countries, Formative Evaluation
Bloomer, Richard H. – 2000
The data compression aspect of 20th century science is evident in the "mass action" concept of brain function embodied in the "g" model of intelligence and academic tests. This paper sketches the history of the devolution of the "g" model into multifactored intelligences, contrasts dynamic process versus static…
Descriptors: Diagnostic Tests, Evaluation Methods, Formative Evaluation, Intelligence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Harvey, Thomas R. – Journal of Higher Education, 1973
Analyzes and evaluates the institutional processes of higher education. (PG)
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Educational Improvement, Evaluation, Formative Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Redfern, George B. – National Elementary Principal, 1973
An analysis of the legislation passed by California, Florida, Oregon, South Dakota, and Washington and the actions taken by the State education agencies in Hawaii and Virginia concerning procedures used to evaluate the performance of school personnel. (Author/MF)
Descriptors: Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria, Formative Evaluation, Performance Criteria
Davies, Ivor K.; Schwen, Thomas M. – Viewpoints, 1972
Descriptors: Decision Making, Educational Improvement, Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria
Johnson, Thomas J. – Viewpoints, 1972
A review of evaluation of product and program development in laboratory and research and development centers. (Editor)
Descriptors: Educational Development, Formative Evaluation, Models, Program Development
Cunningham, Donald J. – Viewpoints, 1972
Descriptors: Curriculum Evaluation, Educational Needs, Formative Evaluation, Information Needs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Satin, David George; Saxe, Leonard – Evaluation and Program Planning: An International Journal, 1979
Three models of evaluation emerge: objective and independent, objective but serving one interest, and pseudo-scientific public relations. Evaluation of an interdisciplinary mental health education program and roles must all be attended to or the weak link undermines the rest. (Author/RL)
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Interdisciplinary Approach, Mental Health Programs, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sarapin, Marvin I. – Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 1981
Reviews formative evaluation and presents a model for instructional material development and revision. The model can be used for curriculum development efforts and is designed to be helpful in a variety of instructional efforts. (CT)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Formative Evaluation, Instructional Materials, Material Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kuehn, Peter – Zielsprache Deutsch, 1979
Basic word-list publications are seen as still inadequate. In these, word building should be dealt with. Recent research findings in the fields of syntax and semantics should also be brought to bear. Useless elements should be eliminated, and active as opposed to passive vocabulary recognized. (IFS/WGA)
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, German, Lexicography, Second Language Instruction
Nugent, Gwen C. – Educational Technology, 1980
Findings of this study on the validity of script reviews in preproduction formative evaluation support the use of script evaluations as a means of identifying program strengths and weaknesses and serving as a guide for revision. Program areas that can be reliably evaluated at the script stage are discussed. (RAO)
Descriptors: Educational Television, Formative Evaluation, Production Techniques, Programing (Broadcast)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lincoln, Yvonna S.; And Others – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1980
Merit is an intrinsic measure of value which inheres in the evaluated entity itself, while worth depends on the interaction of the evaluated entity with its context and may vary dramatically from context to context. If taken seriously, the differences point toward the need for more naturalistically oriented evaluation. (RL)
Descriptors: Achievement Rating, Evaluation Criteria, Formative Evaluation, Merit Rating
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Datta, Lois-ellin – Journal of Vocational Education Research, 1980
Illustrates the need for process evaluation as part of cost-effectiveness/benefit studies. Identifies reasons for ineffectiveness in three outcomes for cost-effectiveness/ benefit analysis (enrollment, completion, employment), and suggests some general strategies for program improvement. (CT)
Descriptors: Cost Effectiveness, Employment, Formative Evaluation, Program Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Dobson, Graeme – Australian Journal on Volunteering, 2003
Explains formative and summative evaluation and the stages of instructional design. Applies Kirkpatrick's model of training evaluation (evaluating reactions, learning, behavior, and results) to volunteer training. (SK)
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Instructional Design, Outcomes of Education, Summative Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ross, Kathryn R.; Batzer, Lyn; Bennington, Elaine – TechTrends, 2002
Discusses the need for quality assurance in distance education; describes evaluation criteria; and reports how Ivy Tech State College (Indiana) created a peer review process as a formative evaluation tool to assure the quality of its distance education courses. Explains roles of the participants and evaluation of the peer review prototype. (LRW)
Descriptors: Distance Education, Evaluation Criteria, Formative Evaluation, Higher Education
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  407  |  408  |  409  |  410  |  411  |  412  |  413  |  414  |  415  |  ...  |  668