Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 162 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1003 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2874 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 6346 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Teachers | 506 |
| Practitioners | 317 |
| Researchers | 186 |
| Administrators | 167 |
| Policymakers | 92 |
| Media Staff | 21 |
| Students | 19 |
| Community | 10 |
| Parents | 10 |
| Counselors | 5 |
| Support Staff | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| United Kingdom | 260 |
| Australia | 249 |
| Canada | 222 |
| California | 174 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 150 |
| Texas | 103 |
| China | 100 |
| United States | 97 |
| New Zealand | 87 |
| Turkey | 84 |
| Netherlands | 83 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 8 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 15 |
| Does not meet standards | 8 |
Peer reviewedSatin, David George; Saxe, Leonard – Evaluation and Program Planning: An International Journal, 1979
Three models of evaluation emerge: objective and independent, objective but serving one interest, and pseudo-scientific public relations. Evaluation of an interdisciplinary mental health education program and roles must all be attended to or the weak link undermines the rest. (Author/RL)
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Interdisciplinary Approach, Mental Health Programs, Models
Peer reviewedSarapin, Marvin I. – Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 1981
Reviews formative evaluation and presents a model for instructional material development and revision. The model can be used for curriculum development efforts and is designed to be helpful in a variety of instructional efforts. (CT)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Formative Evaluation, Instructional Materials, Material Development
Peer reviewedKuehn, Peter – Zielsprache Deutsch, 1979
Basic word-list publications are seen as still inadequate. In these, word building should be dealt with. Recent research findings in the fields of syntax and semantics should also be brought to bear. Useless elements should be eliminated, and active as opposed to passive vocabulary recognized. (IFS/WGA)
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, German, Lexicography, Second Language Instruction
Nugent, Gwen C. – Educational Technology, 1980
Findings of this study on the validity of script reviews in preproduction formative evaluation support the use of script evaluations as a means of identifying program strengths and weaknesses and serving as a guide for revision. Program areas that can be reliably evaluated at the script stage are discussed. (RAO)
Descriptors: Educational Television, Formative Evaluation, Production Techniques, Programing (Broadcast)
Peer reviewedLincoln, Yvonna S.; And Others – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1980
Merit is an intrinsic measure of value which inheres in the evaluated entity itself, while worth depends on the interaction of the evaluated entity with its context and may vary dramatically from context to context. If taken seriously, the differences point toward the need for more naturalistically oriented evaluation. (RL)
Descriptors: Achievement Rating, Evaluation Criteria, Formative Evaluation, Merit Rating
Peer reviewedDatta, Lois-ellin – Journal of Vocational Education Research, 1980
Illustrates the need for process evaluation as part of cost-effectiveness/benefit studies. Identifies reasons for ineffectiveness in three outcomes for cost-effectiveness/ benefit analysis (enrollment, completion, employment), and suggests some general strategies for program improvement. (CT)
Descriptors: Cost Effectiveness, Employment, Formative Evaluation, Program Development
Peer reviewedDobson, Graeme – Australian Journal on Volunteering, 2003
Explains formative and summative evaluation and the stages of instructional design. Applies Kirkpatrick's model of training evaluation (evaluating reactions, learning, behavior, and results) to volunteer training. (SK)
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Instructional Design, Outcomes of Education, Summative Evaluation
Peer reviewedRoss, Kathryn R.; Batzer, Lyn; Bennington, Elaine – TechTrends, 2002
Discusses the need for quality assurance in distance education; describes evaluation criteria; and reports how Ivy Tech State College (Indiana) created a peer review process as a formative evaluation tool to assure the quality of its distance education courses. Explains roles of the participants and evaluation of the peer review prototype. (LRW)
Descriptors: Distance Education, Evaluation Criteria, Formative Evaluation, Higher Education
Peer reviewedKraemer, Jean-Marie – Educational Studies in Mathematics, 2002
Describes formative and self-regulating evaluation, developed by Citogroep and used for primary schools in the Netherlands to signal the progress of 6-12-year-old students and monitor their learning. Presents the structure, principles, and tools of the management of the improvement of differential pedagogy and key ideas for teacher education.…
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Foreign Countries, Formative Evaluation, Mathematics Instruction
Peer reviewedMarshall, Bethan – English in Education, 2002
Offers an interview between Bethan Marshall, a Lecturer in Education at King's College, London, and Dylan Wiliam, a Professor of Assessment in the Department of Education at King's College. Notes that he has been involved in work on assessment, both in research and government policy, for many years. Explores the findings of his research and its…
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, English Instruction, Formative Evaluation, Higher Education
Peer reviewedDearing, James W.; Meyer, Gary – Science Communication, 1994
Presents and demonstrates three new concepts in innovation diffusion: the attribution matrix, the innovation profile, and the potential for adoption rating that determines which among similar innovations is most likely to be adopted. This predictive model represents a means of conducting formative evaluation research about the potential for…
Descriptors: Adoption (Ideas), Diffusion (Communication), Formative Evaluation, Innovation
Reeves, Thomas C. – Educational Technology, 1992
Begins by discussing what interactive multimedia (IMM) is, why it is used, and how it should be evaluated. A pragmatic approach to evaluation is advocated, and a framework for formative evaluation is proposed, which focuses on formative experimentation. The educational goals of IMM technology and methods of formative experimentation are detailed.…
Descriptors: Educational Objectives, Evaluation Criteria, Formative Evaluation, Hypermedia
Peer reviewedJitendra, Asha K.; Kameenui, Edward J. – Remedial and Special Education (RASE), 1993
This article looks at the limits of traditional assessment techniques and argues for dynamic assessment of students with disabilities. The critical features of five models of dynamic assessment are described. The limitations of dynamic assessment are considered, and guidelines are offered to further the use of this approach. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Disabilities, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Formative Evaluation
Peer reviewedElliott, Robert; And Others – Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1994
Used Comprehensive Process Analysis to analyze six client-identified significant insight events in two treatments. Psychodynamic-interpersonal therapy event documented existence of two-part significant events and value of key words. Cognitive-behavioral therapy event illustrated role of context in transforming small therapy events into significant…
Descriptors: Behavior Modification, Cognitive Restructuring, Foreign Countries, Formative Evaluation
Peer reviewedFontana, Jean – NASSP Bulletin, 1994
Annual summative evaluation rarely brings about professional growth or change; ongoing formative evaluation that allows for corrections and encourages development of new skills and talents is more effective. Data alone are not enough. Principals' needs must be linked to the resources of people, materials, funds, and enriched staff development…
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria, Formative Evaluation


