Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 162 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1003 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2874 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 6346 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Teachers | 506 |
| Practitioners | 317 |
| Researchers | 186 |
| Administrators | 167 |
| Policymakers | 92 |
| Media Staff | 21 |
| Students | 19 |
| Community | 10 |
| Parents | 10 |
| Counselors | 5 |
| Support Staff | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| United Kingdom | 260 |
| Australia | 249 |
| Canada | 222 |
| California | 174 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 150 |
| Texas | 103 |
| China | 100 |
| United States | 97 |
| New Zealand | 87 |
| Turkey | 84 |
| Netherlands | 83 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 8 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 15 |
| Does not meet standards | 8 |
Beckner, Weldon E.; Medley, Gene W. – 1975
Current trends in teacher education are characterized by programs designed to emphasize approaches to learning which are competency based, field centered, and individualized. Presently few colleges and universitites have progressed very far in the development and implementation of these innovative teacher education programs. This study presents…
Descriptors: Administrative Principles, Competency Based Teacher Education, Curriculum Development, Field Experience Programs
Steinmetz, Andres – 1976
To evaluate a specific program means to compare it against a standard that specifies what the program should be like at a specific time. Standards may be constructed in three ways: surface standards force the definition into a model shaped by scientific procedure; deep standards include information on the inputs, processes, and outputs for each…
Descriptors: Educational Objectives, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Formative Evaluation
Peer reviewedWatts, Doyle – Clearing House, 1979
Competency testing is only one component of competency-based education (CBE); the others are: educational objectives, instructional process, remedial instruction, and program evaluation/reconceptualization. To implement only competency testing may result in disillusionment with the entire concept of CBE, which seeks to improve programs, not fail…
Descriptors: Competency Based Education, Curriculum Development, Educational Objectives, Formative Evaluation
Gabb, Roger G. – Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 1978
Describes the use of a self-instructional system in an animal structure and function course for meat inspection students at Lincoln College. The method was shown to be successful in promoting learning as measured by pre-test/post-test gain. The highest rated components for both enjoyment and effectiveness in the course were the self-paced feature…
Descriptors: Food and Drug Inspectors, Foreign Countries, Formative Evaluation, Independent Study
Peer reviewedNevo, David; Stufflebeam, Daniel L. – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 1976
High school students, teachers, and principals were surveyed regarding their perceptions of the availability and importance of different types of evaluative information. Overall, all three groups perceived that evaluative information was only occasionally available, which indicating that such information was important. (Author/MV)
Descriptors: Evaluation Needs, Formative Evaluation, High School Students, High Schools
Peer reviewedPigg, R. Morgan – Journal of School Health, 1976
The increasing sophistication of school health program evaluation procedures tends to parallel or reflect the development of the total school health program. (JD)
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Educational Environment, Educational History, Evaluation Methods
Elkins, Donald M. – Journal of Agronomic Education, 1987
Discusses the advantages of using a pretest in introductory agronomy courses. Provides a pretest that has been developed for use in an introductory crops course taught at Southern Illinois University. Includes 25 definitions, 17 true-false and multiple choice questions, and 6 short answer questions. (TW)
Descriptors: Agronomy, College Science, Educational Assessment, Formative Evaluation
Peer reviewedPaolucci-Whitcomb, Phyllis; And Others – Remedial and Special Education (RASE), 1987
Teacher educators of the Instructional Leadership Program at the University of Vermont used interactive evaluation procedures (including numerical, process, and summative approaches) to inform their decisions about program improvement through a new training option for regular and special education leaders. (CB)
Descriptors: Disabilities, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization, Formative Evaluation
Peer reviewedHalpern, Marilyn; Tillman, Hope N. – Education Libraries, 1986
Describes evolving trends in testing, including such topics as formative versus summative evaluations; the use of tests as a guide to instructional decision making; the need to focus on higher level cognitive skills; and the role of computers in testing. An annotated bibliography lists 10 relevant journal articles. (CLB)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Annotated Bibliographies, Cognitive Ability, Computer Assisted Testing
Suzuki, Katsuaki – Educational Technology, 1987
An alternative approach to the systematic design and development of computer-assisted instruction courseware by classroom teachers is described which consist of three main stages of design, development, evaluation, and revision. Each stage produces a usable output: (1) computer-assisted testing program; (2) drill and practice courseware; and (3)…
Descriptors: Authoring Aids (Programing), Computer Assisted Instruction, Computer Assisted Testing, Courseware
Peer reviewedSimonson, Michael R.; And Others – Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1987
Describes the process used to develop two examinations, an achievement test of computer literacy and a computer anxiety index. Highlights include a definition of computer literacy, determination of the validity and reliability of the tests, and a study to evaluate the final versions of the tests. (Author/LRW)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Computer Assisted Instruction, Computer Literacy, Correlation
Peer reviewedStile, Stephen W.; And Others – Journal of Special Education Technology, 1987
A noncomputerized system was developed for collection, storage, and analysis of student performance data in an early childhood special education program. Formative evaluation data for 12 students during one school quarter indicated that the staff made 719 data-based decisions, resulting in reteaching, moving ahead, or branching within cumulative…
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Data Collection, Decision Making, Diagnostic Teaching
Shapiro, Phyllis; And Others – Education Canada, 1986
Notes problems with the current emphasis on summative evaluation of student progress and argues that a formative approach would be more beneficial for students and teachers, offering both groups greater understanding of the learning taking place. Discusses practicalities of adopting formative evaluation procedures, e.g., teacher training, computer…
Descriptors: Accountability, Change Strategies, Definitions, Educational Improvement
Maddocks, Peg; Yelon, Stephen – Performance and Instruction, 1986
Describes the steps in a systematic approach to: identification of most important competencies for industrial trainers for agency use in developing instructor competencies to select, train, and evaluate trainers: determining need for trainer competencies list; identifying competencies; establishing criteria to judge competencies; and testing…
Descriptors: Check Lists, Evaluation Criteria, Formative Evaluation, Identification
Peer reviewedFuchs, Lynn S.; Fuchs, Douglas – Exceptional Children, 1986
This meta-analysis investigated the effects of formative evaluation procedures on student achievement. Twenty-one controlled studies generated 96 relevant effect sizes (average weighted effect size .70). Magnitude of effect of formative evaluation was associated with publication type, data-evaluation method, data display, and use of behavior…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Behavior Modification, Comparative Analysis, Elementary Secondary Education


