Publication Date
| In 2026 | 5 |
| Since 2025 | 186 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1135 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2831 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 6740 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 2680 |
| Teachers | 1135 |
| Administrators | 963 |
| Researchers | 553 |
| Policymakers | 504 |
| Media Staff | 159 |
| Students | 152 |
| Parents | 123 |
| Counselors | 73 |
| Community | 67 |
| Support Staff | 18 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| Canada | 541 |
| Australia | 481 |
| California | 427 |
| United Kingdom | 414 |
| United States | 295 |
| Florida | 275 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 245 |
| Texas | 238 |
| Illinois | 202 |
| New York | 164 |
| China | 146 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 3 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 4 |
| Does not meet standards | 8 |
Jackson, Peter – Thrust: The Journal for Employment and Training Professionals, 1982
This paper presents a set of models that describes the choices that have to be made occasionally by administrators of human resource training programs. The models replicate the decision processes by which certain courses are developed as well as those that determine the kind of participant served in these programs. (CT)
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Decision Making, Evaluation Criteria, Human Resources
Peer reviewedCordray, David S. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1982
In focusing on why and how standards might be incorporated into the evaluation process, two themes are explored: the extent to which the Evaluation Research Society (ERS) Standards differ from other recent standards-setting activities and their applicability to local and state-level evaluation efforts. (Author/LC)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Program Evaluation, School Districts, Standard Setting
Peer reviewedGarrity, Marjorie; And Others – Nursing Outlook, 1980
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Nursing Education, Personnel Evaluation, Program Development
Peer reviewedWisniewski, Richard – Journal of Teacher Education, 1981
A critique is given on Alan Tom's article, "An Alternative Set of NCATE Standards." This critique discusses implications of and possible reactions to Tom's article. (CJ)
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Accrediting Agencies, Educational Quality, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewedJudis, Joseph – Journal of Allied Health, 1982
This article suggests that although student evaluation of instructional quality is important, most commonly used evaluation questionnaires do not truly measure instructional quality. It urges care in the use of these scores in areas affecting the welfare of instructors. (Editor)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Higher Education, Questionnaires, Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance
Peer reviewedLichtman, Allan J.; Rohrer, Daniel M. – Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1982
Responds to Rowland's article, (CS 705 841). Contends that policy systems analysis emerges as the only acceptable paradigm for competitive debate and that it satisfies the criteria for paradigm evaluation. (PD)
Descriptors: Debate, Evaluation Criteria, Higher Education, Models
Peer reviewedRowland, Robert C. – Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1982
Considers the positions developed by Lichtman and Rohrer and by Ulrich, and then focuses on Zarefsky's indictment of the proposed standards for evaluating debate paradigms. (See CS 705 841-705 844). (PD)
Descriptors: Debate, Evaluation Criteria, Higher Education, Models
Slein, Tracy – Quill and Scroll, 1982
Argues that good criticism of school dramatic productions requires an open mind and sensitive observation, not preconceived notions and extreme language. (HOD)
Descriptors: Drama, Evaluation Criteria, Journalism Education, Production Techniques
Peer reviewedBell, Louise C. – Reading World, 1982
Offers a clinical supervision model that provides a means by which reading teachers and supervisors can analyze and improve classroom reading instruction. (FL)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Models, Reading Instruction, Reading Teachers
Peer reviewedKnop, Constance K. – Foreign Language Annals, 1982
Describes strategy for helping student-teachers systematically and consciously plan their lessons using sequence "overview, prime, drill, and check." Author believes this method reduces new teacher insecurity and can be used as means of analyzing the teaching and learning accomplished in class. (Author/BK)
Descriptors: Language Teachers, Lesson Observation Criteria, Lesson Plans, Student Teachers
Peer reviewedCunningham, Patricia M. – Reading Teacher, 1981
Suggests 10 questions teachers should ask themselves before buying materials to teach reading skills. (FL)
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Evaluation Criteria, Instructional Materials, Reading Instruction
Peer reviewedWarnick, Barbara – Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1981
Describes the stages of value analysis. Concludes that the practice of debating value resolutions may lead to a refinement and expansion of argumentation theory and can provide students with an opportunity to clarify their own values. (PD)
Descriptors: Advocacy, Debate, Evaluation Criteria, Higher Education
Peer reviewedPalmer, Joseph W. – Catholic Library World, 1981
Describes some of the publications that can help the librarian become more proficient in selecting, operating, and maintaining audiovisual equipment. (Author/LLS)
Descriptors: Audiovisual Aids, Equipment Maintenance, Evaluation Criteria, Guides
Finney, Doug; And Others – Secondary School Theatre Journal, 1979
Presents criteria for selecting plays for secondary school theater programs to be presented to the public as well as to be studied or produced within the curriculum. Includes consideration of student needs and abilities, appropriateness, budget, and community standards. (JMF)
Descriptors: Audiences, Characterization, Criteria, Drama
Model, Peter – Wilson Library Bulletin, 1981
Lack of space and budget cuts force many libraries to weed out books and to be selective in accepting collection bequests. The approach for deciding which books to weed out and whether to dispose of these books through dealers or auctions are decisions private clubs and many libraries must make. (RBF)
Descriptors: Books, Clubs, Decision Making, Evaluation


