Presents a humorous view of the committee, its members, and its functions on the campus. (RK)

Arguments for and against opening federal advisory committees to the public are discussed. Certain key questions dealing with the effectiveness of this decision, sizes of the loopholes, and effects on the science advisory process are considered. (DF)

A committee was established to better understand and define the physics programs in two-year colleges. Its first task was to select the following working topics: (1) communication and study of the two-year college physics programs and problems, (2) development of modules of instruction for nonscience majors, and (3) use of the computer as an…

A journalism teacher decries the misuse of committees. (RK)

Teachers will be more willing to accept responsibility for results if they have a part in determining the environment in which they practice. (Author)

The American Society for Engineering Education is described with respect to goals, structure, individual and institutional members, divisions, sections, chapters, headquarters, projects, awards, publications, annual conference, and dues. The constitution and by-laws of the society are included with a calendar of activities and a listing of…

Members of the 14 councils of the society are listed as well as section councils and officers, and division officers. American Society for Engineering Education representatives are listed in the following categories: activity coordinators, industrial, and other organizations. (TS)

This followup report, to the First Annual Report of the National Advisory Council on Vocational Education, recommends fundamental policy changes for the federal government in its approach to funding, the role and organization of the U.S. Office of Education, and present and proposed manpower policies and legislation. (GR)

The American Library Association's Social Responsibility Round Table is emphasizing local action to give a national thrust on the issues of society and the role of activist librarians in it. (AB)

Analyzes data from questionnaires returned by members of major federal advisory councils on educational policy. Discusses respondents views of, and satisfaction with, their role. Suggests methods of improving councils' effectiveness. (AL)

Outlines reasons why AIBS has decided not to accredit biology departments. Describes role that is played by AIBS and CUEBS in assisting development of quality college biology programs. (AL)