Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 111 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 575 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1110 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1838 |
Descriptor
| Cheating | 2592 |
| Ethics | 977 |
| Foreign Countries | 805 |
| College Students | 789 |
| Student Attitudes | 772 |
| Plagiarism | 689 |
| Higher Education | 667 |
| Student Behavior | 614 |
| Integrity | 583 |
| College Faculty | 352 |
| Undergraduate Students | 288 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
| Eaton, Sarah Elaine | 25 |
| McCabe, Donald L. | 17 |
| Sinharay, Sandip | 14 |
| Houston, John P. | 10 |
| Bretag, Tracey | 9 |
| Lee, Kang | 9 |
| Curtis, Guy J. | 8 |
| Frary, Robert B. | 8 |
| Osipian, Ararat L. | 8 |
| Trevino, Linda Klebe | 8 |
| Anderman, Eric M. | 7 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 82 |
| Teachers | 77 |
| Administrators | 43 |
| Researchers | 25 |
| Policymakers | 19 |
| Students | 14 |
| Parents | 4 |
| Counselors | 2 |
Location
| Australia | 96 |
| Canada | 77 |
| United Kingdom | 74 |
| United States | 51 |
| Turkey | 48 |
| China | 47 |
| Nigeria | 42 |
| Germany | 26 |
| South Africa | 25 |
| New Zealand | 24 |
| California | 23 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedAckerman, Paul D. – American Educational Research Journal, 1971
Descriptors: Cheating, Codes of Ethics, College Students, Grading
Peer reviewedHouston, John P. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1983
Using an index of answer copying developed by Houston, it was found that rearranged questions alone did not reduce answer copying, whereas rearrangement of both questions and answers effectively eliminated detectable cheating. (Author)
Descriptors: Cheating, Higher Education, Measurement Techniques, Multiple Choice Tests
Peer reviewedWilson, Everett K. – Journal of Higher Education, 1982
Academic patterns of power (over students, curriculum, etc.), pretense (faculty claims about competence and experience), and piggybacking (conversion of institutions into education conglomerates) reveal some ethical issues. The patterns are deeply rooted, each with historical reason for being and current justification, yet each has outcomes that…
Descriptors: Cheating, College Faculty, Ethics, Higher Education
Peer reviewedCooper, Sloan; Peterson, Christopher – Journal of Research in Personality, 1980
Assigned undergraduates to groups defined by combination of factors: opportunity to cheat, type of competition, subject Machiavellianism (Mach). Cheating occurred in opportunity to cheat, impersonal competition, high Mach group and in opportunity to cheat, personal competition, low Mach group. Extends research to situations where subjects cheated…
Descriptors: Cheating, Competition, Individual Characteristics, Individual Differences
Peer reviewedPage, Roger; Bode, James – Journal of Educational Research, 1979
College students instructed to "fake good" on a test of moral reasoning were unable to do so, but they could lower their scores significantly when directed to. (Editor)
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Cheating, Ethics, Moral Values
Peer reviewedMoore, Barbara J. – About Campus, 2002
Academic dishonesty is on the rise. This article examines how we can teach students to honor the truth. Queens College is provided as an example of a school that takes a step beyond simple punishment by asking students to reflect on what they have done. (Contains 11 references.) (GCP)
Descriptors: Cheating, Codes of Ethics, College Students, Discipline Policy
Peer reviewedKarlins, Marvin; And Others – Research in Higher Education, 1988
A study of the cheating behavior of students in an upper-division mass-lecture business course found that only three percent plagiarized a library research assignment. The findings indicate a need to investigate what students do rather than what they say they do with regard to academic dishonesty. (MSE)
Descriptors: Business Administration Education, Cheating, College Students, Higher Education
Peer reviewedRigano, Donna L.; Ritchie, Stephen M. – Research in Science Education, 1995
Identifies and defines the student practice of "fudging" which involves faking, fabricating, or stealing data. Identifies factors contributing to and motivations for this behavior in (n=6) high school students. (Author/MKR)
Descriptors: Cheating, Fraud, High Schools, Interviews
Peer reviewedLiberman, Nira; Klar, Yechiel – Cognition, 1996
Two studies explored the relation of task understanding to performance in the Wason selection tasks, in which subjects successfully solve tasks involving either social exchange situations or cheating detection content and perspective. Findings indicate that previous results (Gigerenzer and Hug, 1992) could be attributed to three general properties…
Descriptors: Cheating, College Students, Performance, Performance Factors
Peer reviewedAsendorpf, Jens B.; Nunner-Winkler, Gertrud – Child Development, 1992
Assessed preschoolers' moral motive strength or attribution of moral emotions to story characters. Also assessed temperamental inhibition and self-control. Children were provided with an opportunity to cheat when they felt they were unobserved. Results indicated that moral motive strength and inhibition predicted low cheating. (BC)
Descriptors: Cheating, Foreign Countries, Individual Differences, Inhibition
Peer reviewedDavis, Kevin – English Journal, 1992
Points out how student cheating illustrates sound principles of teaching and learning, such as negotiation, quality production under time pressure, and collaborative problem solving. (SR)
Descriptors: Cheating, Cooperative Learning, Elementary Secondary Education, Problem Solving
Peer reviewedHansen, Barbara C.; Hansen, Kenneth D. – Journal of Professional Nursing, 1995
Academic and scientific misconduct is coming to public attention. Issues to be resolved include definitions of misconduct, provision for anonymity, role of whistleblowers, burden of proof, statute of limitations, due process, nature and application of sanctions, and potential for rehabilitation. (SK)
Descriptors: Cheating, Due Process, Ethics, Government Role
Peer reviewedDaniel, Larry G.; And Others – Journal of Professional Nursing, 1994
Using Maslow's Need-Goal Motivation Model, data from 190 nursing students showed moderately high correlation between perceptions of peers' maturity, commitment, and neutralizing attitude and perceptions of peers' engagement in academic misconduct. Neutralization (rationalizing behavior) was the strongest predictor. (SK)
Descriptors: Cheating, Ethics, Higher Education, Nursing Education
Peer reviewedLivosky, Marilyn; Tauber, Robert T. – Psychology in the Schools, 1994
College students (n=446) and faculty (n=97) completed survey examining views of cheating. Agreement was noted on most situations. When differences appeared, students tended to be stricter than faculty in their evaluations and were more likely than faculty to label situation as cheating. Opinions and views of cheating were influenced more by…
Descriptors: Cheating, College Faculty, College Students, Ethics
Peer reviewedSauter, David M. – About Campus, 1998
It is surprisingly easy for today's students to change grades, falsify documents, or create bogus diplomas. Explores the extent of the problem and offers ideas on ways in which colleges can protect themselves and society from the consequences of educational fraud. Addresses staff training, distribution of information regarding fraud, and improving…
Descriptors: Cheating, College Students, Fraud, Graduation Requirements


