NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 2,356 to 2,370 of 5,687 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sommers, Jeffrey; And Others – WPA: Writing Program Administration, 1993
Claims that portfolios can be reliably rated in a large-scale assessment situation. Shares the experiences of writing program administrators concerning portfolio assessment. Outlines practical methods of gaining reasonable reliability in portfolio scoring. (RS)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Portfolios (Background Materials), Reliability, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Licklider, Mary M. – English Journal, 1992
Describes the difficulties in assessing writing improvement in high school students based on national reports. Discovers that students' fluency, their use of dialogue, and their ease in moving between the abstract and the concrete is increasing. Suggests the resources of the National Assessment of Educational Progress might yield the information…
Descriptors: Secondary Education, Writing Evaluation, Writing Improvement, Writing Research
Padgett, Ron – Teachers and Writers, 1993
Discusses the dilemmas of evaluating and assessing students' poetry. (SR)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Poetry, Student Evaluation, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mahon, Robert L. – Clearing House, 2005
One minor but irritating problem that most composition teachers face--especially those who handle masses of papers at the high school level--involves coming up with a method of grading that is demonstrably objective but not so rigid that it allows no room for judgment. The author proposes a hybrid grading system: combining numbers and letters. The…
Descriptors: Writing (Composition), Writing Evaluation, Numbers, Grading
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Samuelson, Beth Lewis – Research in the Teaching of English, 2009
This study examines discussions of model papers in a high school Advanced Placement English classroom where students were preparing for a high-stakes writing assessment. Much of the current research on talk about writing in various contexts such as classroom discourse, teacher-student writing conferences, and peer tutoring has emphasized the…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Advanced Placement, Writing Tests, Essays
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ice, Phil; Swan, Karen; Diaz, Sebastian; Kupczynski, Lori; Swan-Dagen, Allison – Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2010
This article used work from the writing assessment literature to develop a framework for assessing the impact and perceived value of written, audio, and combined written and audio feedback strategies across four global and 22 discrete dimensions of feedback. Using a quasi-experimental research design, students at three U.S. universities were…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Writing Evaluation, Education Courses, Teacher Education Programs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Slomp, David H. – Assessing Writing, 2008
Test-based accountability programs are designed to promote improved standards of teaching and learning within the systems of education that they are connected to. Brenan [Brenan, A. L. (2006). "Perspectives on the evolution and future of educational measurement." In: Robert (Ed.), "Educational measurement" (4th ed., pp. 1-16).…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Writing Tests, Evaluation Criteria, Program Effectiveness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Crawford, Lindy; Lloyd, Susan; Knoth, Kelly – Assessment for Effective Intervention, 2008
Type and quality of revisions made by students between first and final drafts of a state writing test were scored using a revision taxonomy. Scorers categorized revisions first by unit (e.g., word, phrase, sentence), and then by type (e.g., addition, substitution, spelling). They then evaluated the impact of each revision on the readability of the…
Descriptors: Writing Tests, Revision (Written Composition), State Standards, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wilde, Jerry; Kreamelmeyer, Kathleen; Buckner, Brenda – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2009
This article is a description of the process of constructing an assessment of written and oral language for pre-service teachers. This assessment was used prior to their formal admission into the teacher education programme. The rationale for this evaluation is presented along with the actual processes involved. Finally, comparisons are made…
Descriptors: Preservice Teacher Education, Student Evaluation, Oral Language, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Burgin, John; Hughes, Gail D. – Assessing Writing, 2009
The authors explored the credibility of using informal reading inventories and writing samples for 138 students (K-4) to evaluate the effectiveness of a summer literacy program. Running Records (a measure of a child's reading level) and teacher experience during daily reading instruction were used to estimate the reliability of the more formal…
Descriptors: Informal Reading Inventories, Multiple Choice Tests, Program Effectiveness, Scoring
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dempsey, Michael S.; PytlikZillig, Lisa M.; Bruning, Roger H. – Assessing Writing, 2009
Writing is a highly valued skill that is often neglected in the classroom; one reason is that teachers often do not receive adequate training in writing assessment and instruction. Teachers, particularly preservice teachers, need practice making detailed assessments of student writing and to build their confidence for assessing student writing,…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Preservice Teacher Education, Preservice Teachers, Writing Evaluation
Muraki, Eiji – 1993
The concept of information functions developed for dichotomous item response models is adapted for the partial credit model. The information function is explained in terms of the model parameters and scoring functions. The relationship between the item information function and the expected score function is also discussed. The information function…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, National Surveys, Scores, Scoring
Naccarato, Richard W. – 1972
A study was initiated by a university rhetoric department to investigate the reliability of methods of rating student themes written as prerequisites for course exemptions. Ten experienced raters were selected to rate the beginning, middle, and ending paragraphs of 30 previously scored exemption themes that represented a range of achievement.…
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Higher Education, Reliability, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Harmon, John – English Journal, 1988
Advises teachers not to evaluate students on day-to-day growth, but instead to allow for measurable growth, evaluating them after a suitable period of time has elapsed. Assumes that true growth in writing occurs slowly, that it is seldom linear, and that distinctions between disparate texts remain spurious. (MS)
Descriptors: Feedback, Secondary Education, Writing Evaluation, Writing Improvement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gambell, Trevor J. – Canadian Journal of Education, 1987
Thirty-three College of Education professors at the University of Saskatchewan were surveyed to determine their expectations and perceptions of and attitudes toward student writing. Results indicate that professors complained more about lack of student ability in the argumentative mode than student errors in syntax and mechanics of writing. (TJH)
Descriptors: Persuasive Discourse, Professors, Rhetoric, Syntax
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  154  |  155  |  156  |  157  |  158  |  159  |  160  |  161  |  162  |  ...  |  380