Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 161 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 772 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1633 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2443 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 585 |
| Teachers | 484 |
| Researchers | 103 |
| Students | 48 |
| Administrators | 43 |
| Policymakers | 13 |
| Parents | 8 |
| Community | 1 |
| Counselors | 1 |
| Media Staff | 1 |
Location
| Canada | 146 |
| China | 128 |
| Turkey | 72 |
| Iran | 70 |
| Australia | 68 |
| California | 49 |
| United Kingdom | 45 |
| Indonesia | 44 |
| Japan | 44 |
| Thailand | 38 |
| Saudi Arabia | 37 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 1 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 5 |
| Does not meet standards | 4 |
Peer reviewedGarner, Ruth and McCaleb, Joseph L. – Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1985
Cuing, organization, and reduction constraints were systematically manipulated in a descriptive passage presented to 120 undergraduate students. Results showed strong effects for cuing on written summary qualities. Performance across treatment combinations on all four outcome measures was far below ceiling level. (Author/BS)
Descriptors: Abstracting, Abstracts, Cues, Higher Education
Peer reviewedNoe, Marcia – Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 1988
Offers heresies about reading, grading, and commenting on student papers which may relieve teachers from constant paper grading. Recommends using peer audiences, deemphasizing grading, expanding and elaborating the stages of the composing process, and modeling effective writing behaviors for students. (RAE)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Secondary Education, Teaching Methods, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewedGuilbault, Janie – Language Arts, 1988
Contends that by using nonfiction writing as a daily developmental process, a child finds a predictable, nurturing, and accepting environment which helps teachers understand their students, helps children learn, and promotes acceptance of both the student and the child. (MS)
Descriptors: Children, Elementary Education, Family Life, Nonfiction
Peer reviewedBizzell, Patricia; Singleton, Royce, Jr. – Teaching Sociology, 1988
Argues that instructors need to think more systematically about how to prepare students to write good essay examinations. Demonstrates that higher levels of learning involving integration, synthesis, evaluation, and application are essential for this type of testing. Concludes that the significance of efficient writing skills is as important as…
Descriptors: Content Area Writing, Essay Tests, Higher Education, Sociology
Peer reviewedZorn, Jeff – English Journal, 1987
Grades the Educational Testing Service in taking over the National Assessment of Educational Progress literacy project with a "C-", claiming Part One earned a "D" for abandoning some of the most cogent and winning strategies of previous NAEP studies and Part Two earned a "C" for providing confusing unexplained data.…
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Evaluation Methods, Language Skills, Teacher Influence
Peer reviewedHoetker, James; Brossell, Gordon – College Composition and Communication, 1986
Reports on a study in the development of content-fair essay topics that provide the majority of examinees with the chance to write on a subject about which they know a great deal, and that reduce opportunities for linguistic misinterpretation. (HTH)
Descriptors: Educational Research, Essay Tests, Higher Education, Test Construction
Peer reviewedElbow, Peter; Belanoff, Pat – College Composition and Communication, 1986
Describes the rationale and procedure for using student writing portfolios in lieu of proficiency writing exams to determine student placement at the State University of New York at Stony Brook. (HTH)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Higher Education, Student Placement, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewedGrimm, Nancy – College Composition and Communication, 1986
Presents guidelines given to students to help make peer group discussions of writing more effective. (HTH)
Descriptors: Group Dynamics, Higher Education, Peer Evaluation, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewedPerkins, Kyle – TESOL Quarterly, 1983
Summarizes and evaluates the major direct methods of assessing writing ability (holistic scoring, analytical scoring, and primary trait scoring) and the most popular indirect methods of predicting students' ability to write (T-unit analysis and a variety of published standardized tests). (EKN)
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Holistic Evaluation, Second Language Instruction, Writing Evaluation
Houston, Linda – Technical Writing Teacher, 1983
Describes a grading option used by technical writing faculty members at Ohio State University that allows students to complete reports on their own in order to learn to work without supervision. (FL)
Descriptors: Grading, Higher Education, Nongraded Student Evaluation, Technical Writing
Peer reviewedMullis, Ina V.S. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1984
Scoring systems for direct writing assessment are described. In holistic scoring, a global quality judgment of the writing sample is made. Primary trait scoring, developed by the National Assessment of Educational Progress, is conducted in accordance with specific goals. Analytic scoring identifies characteristics and quality of writing. These…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Essay Tests, Holistic Evaluation, Scoring
Ewald, Helen Rothchild – Writing Instructor, 1984
Offers suggestions for reinforcing the teaching of writing as process by approaching the evaluation of writing as process. (FL)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Formative Evaluation, Higher Education, Writing Evaluation
Gray, Dorothy; Gray, Karen – National Middle School Association (NJ3), 2005
In this electronic age, handwriting seems to have lost its place in America's classrooms. But while today's students do use the computer for many projects, ultimately they need to have legible handwriting--for employment applications, loan applications, formal social correspondence, note taking, and test taking. Here, the authors call for a…
Descriptors: Writing Instruction, Writing Skills, Writing Processes, Writing Evaluation
Werder, Carmen M. – 2000
This paper reports on the myriad difficulties in getting rid of an unsatisfactory writing examination in place at Western Washington University. First, the paper provides background information on how and why the exam (the Junior Writing Exam) came to be adopted in the 1980s (as a diagnostic test only) and explains what the exam was meant to…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Student Evaluation, Student Needs, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewedHendrickson, Grant – NASSP Bulletin, 1983
Describes how the Longview (Washington) public schools and Washington State University faculty developed a procedure involving a test essay to screen job applicants for writing skills. Concludes that problems exist in finding applicants with the necessary writing skills and that the tests generated uneasiness among the existing staff. (Author/RW)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Teacher Selection, Test Construction, Tests

Direct link
