Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 161 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 772 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1633 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2443 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 585 |
| Teachers | 484 |
| Researchers | 103 |
| Students | 48 |
| Administrators | 43 |
| Policymakers | 13 |
| Parents | 8 |
| Community | 1 |
| Counselors | 1 |
| Media Staff | 1 |
Location
| Canada | 146 |
| China | 128 |
| Turkey | 72 |
| Iran | 70 |
| Australia | 68 |
| California | 49 |
| United Kingdom | 45 |
| Indonesia | 44 |
| Japan | 44 |
| Thailand | 38 |
| Saudi Arabia | 37 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 1 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 5 |
| Does not meet standards | 4 |
Peer reviewedVacc, Nancy N. – Exceptional Children, 1987
Evaluation of letters written by four mildly mentally handicapped eighth grade males either by hand or by word processor indicated: longer letters and more revisions when the word processor was used; higher mean number of words written per unit time when handwritten; and no difference in holistic evaluation of letter quality. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Handwriting, Junior High Schools, Males, Mild Mental Retardation
Peer reviewedKrest, Margie – Journal of Teaching Writing, 1988
Distinguishes between monitoring and evaluating student writing, discusses the rationale for monitoring, demonstrates monitoring procedures, and summarizes major considerations to remember when monitoring writing. (JAD)
Descriptors: Freshman Composition, Higher Education, Revision (Written Composition), Student Writing Models
Allen, Jo – Technical Writing Teacher, 1988
Describes a strategy whereby teachers allow students to determine the standards by which their writing will be judged, and, in doing so, convince students to share their beliefs about good writing. (ARH)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Secondary Education, Teaching Methods, Writing (Composition)
Peer reviewedNewell, George E.; MacAdam, Phyllis – Written Communication, 1987
Presents a systematic strategy for examining topic-related knowledge prior to writing. Discusses a theory-based rationale for the measure, a formalized method for analyzing topic knowledge, and a guide for using the instrument. (JD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Higher Education, Measurement Techniques, Writing Difficulties
Peer reviewedBishop, Wendy – Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 1988
Explores the concept of peer writing groups by reviewing research and offering a plan for preparing, training, monitoring, and evaluating the peer writing group. (SD)
Descriptors: Collaborative Writing, Peer Groups, Teaching Methods, Teamwork
McMahan, Elizabeth – ADE Bulletin, 1986
Offers suggestions for teaching writing as a process, running a workshop classroom, teaching sentence combining, and evaluating student papers. (SRT)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Rhetorical Invention, Sentence Combining, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewedKail, Harvey – English Journal, 1986
Suggests the teacher-written essay as a useful way for writing teachers to respond to student writing and at the same time become people who write. (EL)
Descriptors: Secondary Education, Teacher Role, Teaching Methods, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewedMitchell, Karen; Anderson, Judy – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1986
This study examined the reliability of holistic scoring for a sample of essays written during the Spring 1985 MCAT administration. Analysis of variance techniques was used to estimate the reliability of scoring and to partition score variance into that due to level differences between papers and to context-specific factors. (Author/LMO)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Essay Tests, Holistic Evaluation, Medical Education
Peer reviewedDuthie, James – History and Social Science Teacher, 1986
Defining a web as a diagrammatic representation of any logical train of thought, this article describes how to use the web as a tool for teaching and evaluating essays. Provides several web diagrams. (JDH)
Descriptors: Essay Tests, History Instruction, Instructional Improvement, Secondary Education
Peer reviewedMuller, Pierre – Computers and the Humanities, 1986
This article describes using a computer as a literary learning device and study aid to analyze prose. (JDH)
Descriptors: Computer Uses in Education, Content Analysis, Foreign Countries, Literary Styles
Peer reviewedLeon, Jacqueline; Marandin, Jean-Marie – Computers and the Humanities, 1986
Describes the approach and computer programs used to analyze literature. The two aspects of text captured in the analysis are thematic segmentation and density. Shows how these methods may be applied to Balzac's short story, "Sarrasine." (JDH)
Descriptors: Computer Uses in Education, Content Analysis, Foreign Countries, Literary Styles
Wangberg, Elaine G.; Reutten, Mary K. – Lifelong Learning, 1986
This article describes a "whole language approach" to the development of literacy and a Basic Writing Scale developed to evaluate growth in writing ability and to diagnose strengths and weaknesses in the writing of illiterate adults. (CT)
Descriptors: Adult Learning, Evaluation Methods, Holistic Approach, Literacy Education
Peer reviewedBarritt, Loren; And Others – College Composition and Communication, 1986
Describes efforts of the University of Michigan's English Composition Board to examine and make more uniform the process of evaluating entering student essays for purposes of placement. Examines some of the factors evaluators bring to bear when assessing student papers. (HTH)
Descriptors: College Freshmen, Discourse Analysis, Higher Education, Student Placement
Peer reviewedMier, Margaret – English Quarterly, 1985
Uses resources from the ERIC system to show teachers strategies for making teacher commentary count in writing evaluation and to discuss the characteristics of effective writing evaluations. (EL)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Secondary Education, Teacher Response, Teacher Role
Troyka, Lynn Quitman – Writing Program Administration, 1984
Defends the CUNY-WAT against the charges made by Fishman (CS 731 865). Offers suggestions for those wishing to undertake research into the choice of topics for writing assessment tests. (FL)
Descriptors: Essay Tests, Higher Education, Test Format, Test Items


