Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 161 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 772 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1633 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2443 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 585 |
| Teachers | 484 |
| Researchers | 103 |
| Students | 48 |
| Administrators | 43 |
| Policymakers | 13 |
| Parents | 8 |
| Community | 1 |
| Counselors | 1 |
| Media Staff | 1 |
Location
| Canada | 146 |
| China | 128 |
| Turkey | 72 |
| Iran | 70 |
| Australia | 68 |
| California | 49 |
| United Kingdom | 45 |
| Indonesia | 44 |
| Japan | 44 |
| Thailand | 38 |
| Saudi Arabia | 37 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 1 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 5 |
| Does not meet standards | 4 |
Peer reviewedFreedman, Sarah Warshauer – Research in the Teaching of English, 1981
Examines the relative effects on holistic scores given to college students' expository essays of three types of variables--essay, reader, and environment. (HOD)
Descriptors: Essay Tests, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Expository Writing
Peer reviewedHillyer, Joyce; Ley, Terry C. – Reading Improvement, 1996
Investigates the impact of portfolio assessment strategies on second graders' perceptions of themselves as writers. Finds that the process had positive effects on students' perceptions of themselves as writers; their ability to describe strengths and weaknesses in their writing; their ability to identify changes in themselves as writers; and their…
Descriptors: Grade 2, Portfolio Assessment, Portfolios (Background Materials), Primary Education
Peer reviewedGarza, Lucila A.; Ollmann, Hilda E. – Gifted Child Today Magazine, 1996
This article describes the revision of the writing sample component used as one of five identification criteria for placement in a gifted program. A checklist of characteristics common to gifted writers was developed to be used in evaluating the students' creative writing responses to specific literature selections. A rubric for scoring writing…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Check Lists, Creative Writing, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewedLaFontana, Virginia R. – English Journal, 1996
Suggests that in evaluating student papers audiotapes have several advantages over written comments: audiotapes make for a holistic instead of myopic evaluating approach, and make it easier to make positive comments. Explains system for transferring responsibility for grammatical errors from the teacher to the student. (TB)
Descriptors: Audiotape Recordings, Evaluation Methods, Grading, Grammar
Peer reviewedTownsend, Jane S.; And Others – Preventing School Failure, 1997
Principles of writing assessment with at-risk students are explained, including the importance of identifying the purposes of assessment, assessment in the classroom context, and inclusion of children's and parents' perspectives in assessment of the child's writing progress. (DB)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, High Risk Students, Parent Participation
Peer reviewedSchaffer, Jane – Journal of Teaching Writing, 1996
Describes a method of peer review in which peers read each other's papers while writing questions to inspire invention and elaboration in their partners. Describes a four-day sequence for introducing the peer-review method. (TB)
Descriptors: Editing, Higher Education, Peer Evaluation, Questioning Techniques
Peer reviewedWeigle, Sara Cushing; Boldt, Heather; Valsecchi, Maria Ines – TESOL Quarterly, 2003
Investigates differences in the evaluation of text-responsible (TR) writing and non-text responsible writing by English-as-a-Second-Language instructors and instructors in other disciplines. TR writing requires students to demonstrate understanding of specific texts in their writing rather than writing from personal experience or using a source…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Language Teachers, Second Language Instruction, Second Language Learning
Peer reviewedBurns, Matthew K.; Symington, Todd – Assessment for Effective Intervention, 2003
A study compared the Spontaneous Writing Quotient (SWQ) of the Test of Writing Language-3 to teacher progress ratings of 147 students (grades 3-5) in the local writing curriculum. Corrected coefficients ranged from .39 to .48, offering only low to moderate support for the criterion-related validity relative to the local curriculum. (Contains…
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Evaluation Methods, Learning Disabilities, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewedWyatt-Smith, Claire; Murphy, Judy – English in Education, 2002
Presents current thinking and practices in Queensland, Australia, about how to do critical assessment in the English classroom. Proposes and discusses a framework that brings together interest in text analysis and social practices. Applies the framework showing how it can be used to generate writing tasks and assessment criteria that are…
Descriptors: Critical Reading, Cultural Background, Elementary Secondary Education, English Instruction
Peer reviewedBlattner, Nancy H.; Frazier, Christina L. – Assessing Writing, 2002
Answers questions about how a performance-based assessment of critical thinking skills would correlate with a multiple-choice measure of students' critical thinking skills. Determines whether students' critical thinking abilities would improve after completing a general education course focused on critical thinking and after completing a core…
Descriptors: Critical Thinking, Educational Research, Higher Education, Holistic Approach
Peer reviewedNelson, Jennie – Research in the Teaching of English, 1990
Explores academic writing from the students' side of the desk, examining how different tasks and writing situations influence students' approaches. Finds that responses to assignments depend upon what the students were actually rewarded for producing. (MG)
Descriptors: Case Studies, College English, Freshman Composition, Higher Education
Peer reviewedKroll, Barbara – Journal of Basic Writing, 1990
Discusses the implications of considering different writing components (lexical, syntactic, and rhetorical) separately, in an effort to avoid problems of writing evaluation. Proposes that instead of "balancing" these components, teachers should separate them in working to establish curricula for English-as-a-Second-Language (ESL) students. (MM)
Descriptors: Basic Writing, Curriculum Development, English (Second Language), Higher Education
Peer reviewedLuckner, John L.; Isaacson, Stephen – Journal of Communication Disorders, 1990
This article presents an overview of several written language assessment techniques, as well as a rationale and method for assessing the written expression of hearing-impaired individuals. Fluency, syntactic maturity, vocabulary, content, and conventions of notation are discussed; direct and indirect measures are compared; and a sample composition…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Hearing Impairments, Writing (Composition)
Peer reviewedKearns, Jane A. – English Journal, 1991
Describes a system to evaluate writing in which students use extensive marginal notes to comment on their own writing processes. Provides sample notes from a variety of student papers to illustrate the effectiveness of this system in increasing student knowledge and involvement. (KEH)
Descriptors: Holistic Evaluation, Secondary Education, Self Evaluation (Individuals), Teaching Methods
Peer reviewedYagelski, Robert P. – Journal of Teaching Writing, 1989
Argues that writing students can be their own best critics, if teachers allow them to be. Describes a class in which students were assigned to write and discuss commentaries of their work. Explains that the procedure helps student and teacher alike to identify writing problems. (SG)
Descriptors: Essays, Group Discussion, High Schools, Opinion Papers


