Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 161 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 772 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1633 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2443 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 585 |
| Teachers | 484 |
| Researchers | 103 |
| Students | 48 |
| Administrators | 43 |
| Policymakers | 13 |
| Parents | 8 |
| Community | 1 |
| Counselors | 1 |
| Media Staff | 1 |
Location
| Canada | 146 |
| China | 128 |
| Turkey | 72 |
| Iran | 70 |
| Australia | 68 |
| California | 49 |
| United Kingdom | 45 |
| Indonesia | 44 |
| Japan | 44 |
| Thailand | 38 |
| Saudi Arabia | 37 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 1 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 5 |
| Does not meet standards | 4 |
Peer reviewedSperling, Melanie – Research in the Teaching of English, 1994
Provides a framework for analyzing the multiple aspects of reader perspective in a teacher's approach to writing instruction. Analyzes one teacher's written comments on her students' papers. Shows how this teacher's responses demonstrated marked differences according to level of student or type of writing assignment. (HB)
Descriptors: Case Studies, English Instruction, Higher Education, Teacher Expectations of Students
Peer reviewedHaswell, Richard; Wyche-Smith, Susan – College Composition and Communication, 1994
Recounts the story of how the writing faculty at Washington State University successfully reclaimed their university's writing assessment program. Argues that writing teachers should be leery of assessment programs made by others, and should create their own assessment tools. (HB)
Descriptors: English Curriculum, English Instruction, Higher Education, Program Descriptions
Peer reviewedHuot, Brian – WPA: Writing Program Administration, 1994
Reports on an investigation into the types of writing placement that institutions are currently using, in addition to the kinds of writing courses offered. Outlines current writing placement procedures in hope of spurring further professional conversations concerning these practices. (HB)
Descriptors: Educational Trends, English Curriculum, English Instruction, Higher Education
Peer reviewedHasbrouck, Jan E.; And Others – Teaching Exceptional Children, 1994
In this objective scoring procedure for assessing learning-disabled students' writing, a standardized process is used to collect writing samples, which are then scored for number of legible words, total number of words written, percentage of legible words, correctly spelled words, number of correct word sequences, and mean length of correct word…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Handwriting, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewedAgnew, Eleanor – Assessing Writing, 1995
Discusses "grade inflation," and the pressure on instructors to "play grade roll politics to save their own professional hides." Argues that the grade deflation movement works at cross purposes with its goal of elevating academic standards, and that it is at odds with composition theory and its process pedagogy. Suggests…
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Grade Inflation, Grading, Higher Education
Peer reviewedChiang, Steve Y. – Modern Language Journal, 1999
Investigated the relative importance of various grammatical and discourse features in the evaluation of second-language writing samples produced by college students enrolled in beginning and intermediate French courses. Three native-speaking instructors of French rated 172 essays using a scale that was constructed by a researcher and based on…
Descriptors: College Students, Discourse Analysis, Essays, French
Peer reviewedSasaki, Miyuki; Hirose, Keiko – Language Testing, 1999
Developed an analytic rating scale for Japanese university students' first-language (L1) expository writing. Devised a questionnaire to investigate Japanese L1 teachers' criteria for evaluating expository writing, and, based on questionnaire results, eliminated or reorganized the descriptions under six analytic criteria. (Author/VWL)
Descriptors: College Students, Evaluation Criteria, Expository Writing, Higher Education
Peer reviewedWolfe, Edward W.; Bolton, Sandra; Feltovich, Brian; Niday, Donna M. – Assessing Writing, 1996
Compares essays composed by secondary school students with pen and paper to those composed on a word processor. Finds that word-processed essays were neater, longer, more formal, and had a weaker voice than pen-and-paper essays. Finds word-processed essay quality was unaffected for students with high to medium computer experience but was adversely…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Essays, Secondary School Students, Secondary Schools
Peer reviewedFischer, Katherine M. – Computers and Composition, 1996
Describes a creative writing class in which students used hypertext to develop their writing portfolios. Suggests that, much like "Kansas Dorothy" who ventured into Oz, a "tornado" carried these students and their teacher from the safe Paperland to the yellow chip road of electronic portfolios. Notes that students' portfolios…
Descriptors: Creative Writing, Electronic Text, Higher Education, Hypermedia
Peer reviewedBruna, Liza; Marshall, Ian; McCormack, Tim; Parascondola, Leo; Ryden, Wendy; Whithaus, Carl – Journal of Basic Writing, 1998
Transcribes a colloquium among doctoral candidates in rhetoric and composition at the CUNY (City University of New York) Graduate School--participants are also teachers advocating for their students. Discusses current and proposed assessment practices at CUNY. (PA)
Descriptors: English Instruction, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Graduate Students
Peer reviewedBernstein, Susan Naomi – Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 1998
Describes how one teacher uses life writing (reading and writing about transformative life experiences) in her basic writing class to engage students and to help them understand the power and purpose of reaching out to a variety of audiences. Discusses grading life writing. (SR)
Descriptors: Audience Awareness, Basic Writing, Life Events, Personal Narratives
Steineger, Melissa – Northwest Education, 1996
Teachers from Kent School District (Washington) participated in intensive teacher training on an alternative model of writing assessment. Based on six traits of good writing, the model provides a common framework for writing goals and assessments by teachers and students themselves, and has generated enthusiasm among teachers, students, and…
Descriptors: Alternative Assessment, Educational Improvement, Elementary Secondary Education, Faculty Development
Peer reviewedPeterson, Shelley – Research in the Teaching of English, 1998
Examines the relationship between teachers' perceptions of gender-related differences in grade 6 students' narrative writing and teachers' scoring of five student narrative papers. Finds that teachers observed gender-related narrative writing characteristics that were consistent with researchers' analyses of children's narrative writing. (PA)
Descriptors: Gender Issues, Grade 6, Intermediate Grades, Sex Differences
Neill, Monty – Instructor, 2000
As standardized tests increase in importance but remain fundamentally unchanged, they will guarantee the continued narrowing of instruction (as teachers concentrate on preparing students to pass them). Short-answer questions keep the focus on isolated fragments of learning. Writing samples are treated as formulaic exercises. Today's schools sorely…
Descriptors: Educational Change, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Performance Based Assessment
Peer reviewedAmmer, Jerome J. – Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 1998
Constructs a model for successful peer involvement for assessing writing produced by classmates with learning disabilities. Discusses six effective outcome building blocks: (1) cooperative learning from a student perspective; (2) peer as a learning assistant; (3) orchestrating purposeful peer interactions; (4) valuing peer assessment; (5)…
Descriptors: Cooperative Learning, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Learning Disabilities


