Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 161 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 772 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1633 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2443 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 585 |
| Teachers | 484 |
| Researchers | 103 |
| Students | 48 |
| Administrators | 43 |
| Policymakers | 13 |
| Parents | 8 |
| Community | 1 |
| Counselors | 1 |
| Media Staff | 1 |
Location
| Canada | 146 |
| China | 128 |
| Turkey | 72 |
| Iran | 70 |
| Australia | 68 |
| California | 49 |
| United Kingdom | 45 |
| Indonesia | 44 |
| Japan | 44 |
| Thailand | 38 |
| Saudi Arabia | 37 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 1 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 5 |
| Does not meet standards | 4 |
Peer reviewedHorowitz, Daniel M. – TESOL Quarterly, 1986
Analysis of the actual writing assignments and essay tests given to college students showed that tests and assignments were mostly highly controlled and fell into seven categories, including summary of/reaction to reading, comma-annotated bibliography, and research project. Implications for creating tasks in the English for Academic Purposes…
Descriptors: College Students, English (Second Language), English for Academic Purposes, Essay Tests
Gordon, Barbara L. – Writing Program Administration Journal, 1987
Compares the use of writing samples and standardized tests for college English placement, arguing that a single writing sample is not sufficient for proper evaluation, and provides guidelines for using standardized tests appropriately and accurately. (HTH)
Descriptors: College Freshmen, Comparative Analysis, Freshman Composition, Higher Education
Peer reviewedReed, W. Michael; Burton, John K. – Journal of Teaching Writing, 1985
Examines how teacher evaluation effects students' willingness and motivation and hence the writing process. Analyzes results of a survey measuring student responses to several kinds of evaluation of their essays. Concludes that informal evaluation (e.g. peer evaluation, conferences, ungraded writing) improves students' attitudes. (JG)
Descriptors: Grading, Higher Education, Student Attitudes, Teacher Influence
Peer reviewedArcher, John; McCarthy, Barry – Educational Research, 1988
Several lines of social psychological research that indicate possible biases in assessment of students' written work are reviewed. These are sex bias, physical attractiveness, and prior knowledge. There is evidence of likely biases from all three areas; further research in real, as opposed to simulated, assessments is required. (Author/CH)
Descriptors: Physical Characteristics, Postsecondary Education, Prior Learning, Sex Bias
Peer reviewedRaimes, Ann – Language Learning, 1987
Examines the writing strategies of English-as-a-second-language (ESL) student writers at different levels of ESL instruction. Results indicate that native and non-native writers had many strategies in common, but ESL learners were less inhibited by attempts to correct their work. Little correlation was found among English proficiency, writing…
Descriptors: College Students, English (Second Language), Higher Education, Language Proficiency
Peer reviewedDurst, Russel K.; Marshall, James D. – Research in the Teaching of English, 1987
Lists and annotates books and articles on the following topics: (1) writing contexts; (2) status surveys; (3) writing instruction; (4) writing processes; (5) text analysis; (6) writing assessment; (7) writing and learning; (8) language processing; (9) language development; (10) language interrelationships; and (11) language and schooling. Also…
Descriptors: Annotated Bibliographies, Discourse Analysis, Educational Research, English Instruction
Peer reviewedKrest, Margie – English Journal, 1987
Noting that English teachers are often overwhelmed by the time they must spend grading papers, claims there is a need to rethink teaching philosophy and suggests specific methods for teaching writing and grading papers based on sound research-based theory. (NH)
Descriptors: Holistic Evaluation, Peer Evaluation, Secondary Education, Teacher Role
Peer reviewedKuusinen, Jorma; Leskinen, Esko – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1988
Covariance structure modeling by LISREL was used in an analysis of relations between intellectual ability, as measured by the Finnish version of the Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities (ITPA), and achievement in reading, writing, foreign language, and mathematics in longitudinal data on 234 Finnish school children. The validity of the ITPA…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Computer Simulation, Computer Software, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewedMason, Myron L. – Illinois School Research and Development, 1985
Describes the objectives and background of a project designed to implement change in a school district's written communication program and analyzes the data obtained from writing evaluation forms. (HOD)
Descriptors: Basic Skills, Elementary Education, English Curriculum, Language Arts
Peer reviewedFrager, Alan M. – Journal of Reading, 1985
Presents three ideas for teaching content area writing, noting that such writing is most productive when assignments are based on real subject area topics and authentic styles. (HOD)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Content Area Writing, Evaluation Criteria, Models
Peer reviewedSudol, Ronald A. – College Composition and Communication, 1985
Suggests a computerized writing workshop provides an ideal setting for collaborative learning, enabling students to participate in activities such as peer evaluation and group brainstorming. (HOD)
Descriptors: Feedback, Higher Education, Peer Evaluation, Revision (Written Composition)
Peer reviewedSommers, Jeffrey – Journal of Teaching Writing, 1985
Describes an approach to writing evaluation in which the teacher asks the student to write a student-teacher memo--a brief, informal not-to-be-graded communication--that explains the student's intention in responding to the writing assignment. (HOD)
Descriptors: Interpersonal Communication, Revision (Written Composition), Secondary Education, Student Participation
Peer reviewedRobertson, Michael – College Composition and Communication, 1986
Decries the narrow focus of teachers' comments on technique at the expense of content in students' essays. (HTH)
Descriptors: Grading, Higher Education, Student Attitudes, Teacher Attitudes
Peer reviewedMcKay, Lin – English Journal, 1986
Describes a project that provided students with the opportunity to observe and comment on their own writing throughout the year through observations of their childhood writing, a series of journal writings, and writing taken through revision. (EL)
Descriptors: Decision Making, Developmental Stages, English Instruction, Learning Activities
Peer reviewedCox, Billie – English Journal, 1986
Describes the writing evaluation of an 11th-grade English class in which precourse and postcourse samples are graded by a team of English teachers. (EL)
Descriptors: Educational Cooperation, English Departments, English Instruction, Evaluation Methods


