Publication Date
| In 2026 | 3 |
| Since 2025 | 74 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 575 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1539 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3804 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Aunio, Pirjo | 14 |
| Fuchs, Lynn S. | 14 |
| Fuchs, Douglas | 11 |
| Hughes, Jan N. | 9 |
| Ladd, Helen F. | 9 |
| Amos, Jason, Ed. | 8 |
| Buchanan, Denise | 8 |
| DeVenney, William S. | 8 |
| Deshler, Donald D. | 8 |
| Finnigan, Kara S. | 8 |
| Fletcher, Jack M. | 8 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 194 |
| Teachers | 149 |
| Policymakers | 100 |
| Researchers | 93 |
| Administrators | 64 |
| Parents | 29 |
| Students | 23 |
| Counselors | 11 |
| Community | 5 |
| Support Staff | 1 |
Location
| California | 196 |
| United States | 181 |
| Australia | 125 |
| Texas | 124 |
| Florida | 116 |
| New York | 103 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 89 |
| North Carolina | 87 |
| Canada | 86 |
| Michigan | 78 |
| United Kingdom | 75 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 22 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 33 |
| Does not meet standards | 24 |
Peer reviewedBlair, John Raymond – Child Development, 1972
Results indicated that the normal achievers learned more effectively under person and performance reinforcement than under tangible reinforcement, whereas the reverse was true for low achievers. (Author)
Descriptors: Achievement Rating, Data Analysis, Discrimination Learning, Grade 3
Metzner, Seymour – Phi Delta Kappan, 1970
Educational problems in disadvantaged schools are attributed to students' culturally deprived early childhood social environments, rather than to inadequacies of teachers. (MF)
Descriptors: Child Rearing, Disadvantaged, Disadvantaged Schools, Low Achievement
Peer reviewedHansen, W. Lee; And Others – American Economic Review, 1970
Descriptors: Educational Background, Educational Benefits, Educational Experience, Income
Peer reviewedLobitz, W. Charles – School Counselor, 1970
This is a brief description of a successful small scale team approach to helping failing students. Success is attributed to providing low achievers with special attention, and high achievers with a creative outlet for their intellectual energies. (CJ)
Descriptors: Cross Age Teaching, Group Counseling, High School Students, Interpersonal Relationship
Peer reviewedChandler, Arnold M. – Arithmetic Teacher, 1970
Descriptors: Curriculum, Educational Programs, Elementary School Mathematics, Instructional Materials
Peer reviewedWeiss, Sol – Math Teacher, 1969
Report on questionnaires sent to 200 leading mathematics educators in the country asking their opinion on what mathematics should be taught to low achievers in the junior high school. Results tend to confirm the existence of widely conflicting views on what mathematics is most appropriate for low achievers. (RP)
Descriptors: Curriculum, Junior High Schools, Low Ability Students, Low Achievement
Robey, Dale L.; Harper Jack T. – J Sch Health, 1969
Descriptors: College Students, Health, Health Services, Low Achievement
Peer reviewedMiske, Shirley – Lutheran Education, 1980
Education in United States society reflects the evolution from an assimilationist melting pot concept toward one of cultural pluralism. The needs assessment process is a vehicle for gathering information and for initiating multicultural education. (JN)
Descriptors: Bilingual Education, Elementary Education, Ethnic Groups, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedDoscher, Mary-Lynn; Bruno, James E. – American Educational Research Journal, 1981
Possible distortions in standardized test scores due to guessing, particularly in inner-city situations, are examined. A procedure is presented for estimating true knowledge levels from test scores. Results show scores are overstatements of subject mastery which means many programs are being planned and evaluated using inaccurate data. (Author/DWH)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Guessing (Tests), Low Achievement, Mathematical Formulas
Peer reviewedStipek, Deborah J. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1981
This study examines the accuracy of kindergarten through third-grade children's perceptions of their own relative ability. Also tested is the hypothesis that children's ratings of classmates' ability are based on actual performance at an earlier age than are ratings of their own ability. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Early Childhood Education, High Achievement, Low Achievement, Peer Evaluation
Peer reviewedMoran, Mary Ross – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1981
Writing samples were analyzed for syntactic maturity, productivity and word selection; for conventions such as tense and number markers and number agreement; and for spelling, punctuation, and capitalization. Only spelling performance proved significantly different in favor of low achievers. (Author)
Descriptors: Capitalization (Alphabetic), Grammar, Learning Disabilities, Low Achievement
Peer reviewedWiseman, Douglas E.; And Others – NASSP Bulletin, 1980
Low achievement in school is often a result of poor reading skills. These authors outline an alternate, nonreading curriculum that emphasizes content, not skill. (Author/JM)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Course Content, High Schools, Individualized Instruction
Landers, Daniel M. – Research Quarterly, 1978
This study of male and female high school athletes supports the contention that males, but not females, who participate heavily in athletics do not develop the academic skills necessary for later success in college. (PBS)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Athletes, Athletics, College Preparation
Peer reviewedCrowley, Sharon – College Composition and Communication, 1977
Offers a model of students' composing process based on students' composition diaries, and suggests why student writing often falls short of instructors' expectations. (DD)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, College Freshmen, Higher Education, Low Achievement
Spear-Swerling, Louise; Sternberg, Robert J. – Phi Delta Kappan, 1998
Educators wishing to help low-achieving children must discard the concept of learning disabilities entirely and adopt a new way of thinking about children's learning problems. Learning-disabilities specialists should become learning specialists who understand the cognitive processes typically involved in acquiring academic skills, ways the…
Descriptors: Educational Change, Elementary Education, Intelligence, Labeling (of Persons)


