Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 161 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 772 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1633 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2443 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 585 |
| Teachers | 484 |
| Researchers | 103 |
| Students | 48 |
| Administrators | 43 |
| Policymakers | 13 |
| Parents | 8 |
| Community | 1 |
| Counselors | 1 |
| Media Staff | 1 |
Location
| Canada | 146 |
| China | 128 |
| Turkey | 72 |
| Iran | 70 |
| Australia | 68 |
| California | 49 |
| United Kingdom | 45 |
| Indonesia | 44 |
| Japan | 44 |
| Thailand | 38 |
| Saudi Arabia | 37 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 1 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 5 |
| Does not meet standards | 4 |
Peer reviewedOlson, Mary W.; Raffeld, Paul – Reading Psychology, 1987
Investigates the effects of two types of written comments on student compositions and learning of course content. Supports the idea that content comments seem to help students write better essays. Suggests that writing reflectively and thoughtfully about a topic increases learning of that topic. (JK)
Descriptors: Content Area Writing, Feedback, Teacher Response, Writing (Composition)
Peer reviewedHull, Glynda – Research in the Teaching of English, 1987
Analyzes the editing behavior of skilled and less skilled writers. Results show that while the more skilled writers almost always corrected more errors than the less skilled, the two groups performed similarly on their own essays where neither corrected many errors at all. (SRT)
Descriptors: Editing, Error Patterns, Higher Education, Peer Evaluation
Peer reviewedKnudson, Ruth – English Journal, 1986
Describes the implementation of a content area writing program in a middle school. Observes that many teachers were resistant to the task and passed their frustration on to the English teachers. However, most were pleased with the improvement in students' writing due to the increase in the amount of required writing. (SRT)
Descriptors: Content Area Writing, Educational Cooperation, Middle Schools, Secondary Education
Peer reviewedHanania, Edith; Shikhani, May – TESOL Quarterly, 1986
Describes a study of the interrelationships among three tests (a standardized English-as-a-second-language test, a cloze test, and a written composition test) which sought to determine whether adding the cloze test to the ESL test would improve the predictability of students' communicative proficiency, as reflected in their writing test…
Descriptors: Cloze Procedure, English (Second Language), Higher Education, Language Proficiency
Peer reviewedGay, Carol – Children's Literature in Education, 1985
Describes a program created by members of the English department at Youngstown State University that achieves the goal of fostering cooperation between universities, area schools, and the community at the same time that it demonstrates the potential of raising the levels of basic writing skills and stimulating a desire to read. (HOD)
Descriptors: Competition, English Instruction, Higher Education, Learning Activities
Peer reviewedSchwalm, David E. – College English, 1985
Presents insights that the Oral Proficiency Testing Program of the Foreign Service Institute can give writing teachers and focuses specifically on how these insights can help them to identify and articulate appropriate objectives for basic writing courses and to develop curricula appropriate to those objectives. (EL)
Descriptors: Basic Skills, College English, English Instruction, Higher Education
Peer reviewedOnore, Cynthia S. – Journal of Reading, 1986
Reviews the Stanford Writing Assessment Program that has three intended uses: district-wide survey of students' writing ability, diagnosis of classroom or district-wide instructional strengths and weaknesses, and staff development through training for administering and scoring of writing samples. Notes that of these uses, none is necessarily best…
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Educational Diagnosis, Evaluation Methods, Staff Development
Wilkinson, Andrew – Highway One, 1985
Describes the efforts of the Crediton Project, an ongoing research project in Devon, England, to develop an assessment scheme that accounts for cognitive, affective, moral, and stylistic development in children's writing. (DF)
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Elementary Education, English Instruction, Models
Peer reviewedGere, Anne Ruggles; Abbott, Robert D. – Research in the Teaching of English, 1985
Examines the language of writing groups at fifth, eighth, and eleventh grade levels to determine what students say when they critique one another's work. Analysis of idea units revealed that the highest proportion focused on the content of writing. The rubric for coding ideas is appended. (HOD)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Discourse Analysis, Elementary Secondary Education, Group Discussion
Peer reviewedMarshall, James D.; Durst, Russel K. – Research in the Teaching of English, 1986
Describes recent research studies in the areas of writing (contexts, status surveys, instruction, processes, text analysis, assessment rhetoric), language (processing, development, interrelationships, language and schooling), literature, and teacher education. (HOD)
Descriptors: Educational Research, English Teacher Education, Language Acquisition, Language Processing
Peer reviewedTyler, Ralph W. – International Journal of Educational Research, 1986
This monograph examines the shortcomings of conceptualization and practice in the evaluation of student learning and the uses of evaluation for teachers, principals, district supervisors, and state and national authorities. A new paradigm is proposed for assessing educational potential, effective learning, educational achievements of large…
Descriptors: Economic Change, Educational Assessment, Educational Change, Educational Opportunities
Peer reviewedGambell, Trevor – English Quarterly, 1984
Describes a small study on student writing errors and generates three guidelines that university professors can follow to improve student writing: vary assignment types, utilize self- and peer grading, and make more use of essay exams. (CRH)
Descriptors: Content Area Writing, Educational Improvement, Educational Principles, Error Analysis (Language)
Peer reviewedSmith, William L.; And Others – Written Communication, 1985
Concludes that structure of topic makes a difference in writing quality, fluency, and total error but not in any error ratio. Suggests that, for placement testing, educators should first decide which types of students they wish to identify, because each topic structure distinguishes low, average, and high ability students differently. Topic…
Descriptors: Academic Aptitude, College Freshmen, Higher Education, Reader Response
Peer reviewedWestcott, Warren; Gardner, Phillip – Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 1984
Argues that holistic scoring, widely used as a reliable method of rating student writing, can be used effectively as a teaching device. Having students evaluate other students' writing helps ease the teacher-student antagonism generated by the necessity of assigning grades and helps reinforce the connection between abstract idea of quality of…
Descriptors: Classroom Techniques, Higher Education, Holistic Evaluation, Peer Evaluation
Peer reviewedPearce, Daniel L. – Journal of Reading, 1983
Discusses the use of holistic evaluation, the use of rubrics and checklists, peer evaluation, and small group peer evaluation as means of making writing evaluation effective while keeping the paper load manageable. (FL)
Descriptors: Content Area Writing, Grading, Language Processing, Secondary Education


