NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 4,471 to 4,485 of 5,687 results Save | Export
Hunter, William J.; And Others – Writing Notebook: Creative Word Processing in the Classroom, 1990
Reviews research (1) concerning the use of word processors in improving children's writing; (2) students' attitudes toward writing; and (3) how improvements in writing are measured. Notes that current research should not be accepted at face value. Argues that teachers should seek ways in which the availability of word processors can help students…
Descriptors: Literature Reviews, Research Utilization, Revision (Written Composition), Word Processing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Howard, Rebecca Moore – Computers and Composition, 1996
Argues that, for a successful pedagogy of online portfolios, teachers should set up the computer network before the term begins; guide students to teach themselves how to use the system; explain the portfolio system at the beginning of the term; prompt revision even on "satisfactory" submissions; accept revisions only from…
Descriptors: Classroom Techniques, Computer Networks, Electronic Text, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gierl, Mark J. – Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 1998
Examined the generalizability of written-response scores on the English 30 diploma examination administered to Alberta 12th-grade students. Student scores differed as a function of rater, but this variance component was small across two tasks and two administrations; score generalizability was high using a two-rater system; and scale variability…
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Foreign Countries, Generalizability Theory, High School Seniors
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Braine, George – Computers and Composition, 1997
Compares English-as-a-Second Language (ESL) students in first-year English classes writing in two contexts: in a networked computer class and in a traditional lecture-style class. Shows that the networked setting promoted better writing and more peer and teacher feedback, and that the traditional setting promoted more improvement in writing. (RS)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Instruction, Computer Networks, English (Second Language)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
DiGiovanni, Elaine; Nagaswami, Girija – ELT Journal, 2001
This study explores whether online peer review can be a worthwhile alternative to face-to-face peer review. It was conducted in two pre-college English-as-a-Second-Language writing classes at a community college to examine students' responses in both modes of peer review, and to see whether online peer review could become a viable option.…
Descriptors: Community Colleges, Computer Uses in Education, English (Second Language), Peer Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Carifio, James; Jackson, Ina; Dagostino, Lorraine – Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 2001
Reports the findings of a small-scale study assessing whether students revise essays more effectively when given written diagnoses that identify textual flaws and prescriptive comments, compared with a group of control students who received only directions stating that flaws were present. Concludes that while both groups' revising skills improved…
Descriptors: College Students, Community Colleges, Instructional Improvement, Process Approach (Writing)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Serafini, Frank – Reading Teacher, 2001
Describes how the three paradigms of assessment (assessment as measurement, as procedure, or as inquiry) are similar and how they are different, using writing portfolios to help distinguish between them. Presents several factors that support teachers making a "paradigm shift" from assessment as measurement to assessment as inquiry. Explains…
Descriptors: Alternative Assessment, Educational Practices, Educational Principles, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wilhelm, Kim Hughes; Rivers, Marilyn – Applied Language Learning, 2001
Focuses on the evolution of an assessment scheme implemented in an English for academic purposes (EAP) process writing course that sought to meet the assessment needs of three different audiences: learners, teachers, outsiders. Assessment plans and revisions are described. (Author/VWL)
Descriptors: English for Academic Purposes, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education, Process Approach (Writing)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Skillings, Mary Jo; Ferrell, Robbin – Reading Teacher, 2000
Highlights a performance assessment process used by one teacher with her second and third grade students, in which teacher and students work together to generate specific performance standards for a variety of reading and writing tasks. Looks at setting the stage; teacher-student collaboration in structured rubric development; expanding the…
Descriptors: Learner Controlled Instruction, Performance Based Assessment, Primary Education, Self Motivation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Jochum, Julie; Curran, Christina; Reetz, Linda – Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 1998
Explores the portfolio process as an evaluation tool for authentic assessment of writing. Discusses (1) current literature related to use of portfolios; (2) the critical elements of the portfolio process; (3) their relationship to the authentic assessment of writing; and (4) effective ways of implementing individual educational portfolios for…
Descriptors: Curriculum Development, Elementary Secondary Education, Learning Disabilities, Low Achievement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
de Haan, Pieter; van Esch, Kees – Assessing Writing, 2005
This article presents the first results of the study of argumentative essays in English as a foreign language and in Spanish as a foreign language and as a native language, carried out at Radboud University Nijmegen (formerly the University of Nijmegen) between 2002 and 2008. The aim of the project is to compare teachers' holistic assessments with…
Descriptors: Writing (Composition), Essays, Writing Skills, English (Second Language)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cumming, Alister; Kantor, Robert; Baba, Kyoko; Erdosy, Usman; Eouanzoui, Keanre; James, Mark – Assessing Writing, 2005
We assessed whether and how the discourse written for prototype integrated tasks (involving writing in response to print or audio source texts) field tested for Next Generation TOEFL[R] differs from the discourse written for independent essays (i.e., the TOEFL Essay[R]). We selected 216 compositions written for six tasks by 36 examinees in a field…
Descriptors: Grammar, Field Tests, English (Second Language), Pragmatics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Slomp, David H.; Fuite, Jim – Assessing Writing, 2004
Specialists in the field of large-scale, high-stakes writing assessment have, over the last forty years alternately discussed the issue of maximizing either reliability or validity in test design. Factors complicating the debate--such as Messick's (1989) expanded definition of validity, and the ethical implications of testing--are explored. An…
Descriptors: Information Theory, Writing Evaluation, Writing Tests, Test Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Peterson, Shelley; Childs, Ruth; Kennedy, Kerrie – Assessing Writing, 2004
This study examined the possible gender differences in teachers' scoring and written feedback on two narrative and two persuasive writing samples sent to 108 grade six teachers throughout one Canadian province. Participating teachers read a narrative and a persuasive piece of writing from one boy, and a narrative and persuasive piece written by…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Writing Evaluation, Females, Scoring
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Saunders, Paula; Scialfa, Charles T. – Written Communication, 2003
The purpose of Study 1a was to determine the criteria that differentiate students who perform well and those who perform poorly on a standardized test of university-level writing. Discriminant function analysis revealed that measures of structure, sentencing, paragraphing, and grammar play the most important role in separating these two groups.…
Descriptors: Standardized Tests, Academic Achievement, Program Effectiveness, Discriminant Analysis
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  295  |  296  |  297  |  298  |  299  |  300  |  301  |  302  |  303  |  ...  |  380