Publication Date
| In 2026 | 4 |
| Since 2025 | 184 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1133 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2829 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 6738 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 2680 |
| Teachers | 1135 |
| Administrators | 963 |
| Researchers | 553 |
| Policymakers | 504 |
| Media Staff | 159 |
| Students | 152 |
| Parents | 123 |
| Counselors | 73 |
| Community | 67 |
| Support Staff | 18 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| Canada | 541 |
| Australia | 481 |
| California | 427 |
| United Kingdom | 414 |
| United States | 295 |
| Florida | 274 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 245 |
| Texas | 238 |
| Illinois | 202 |
| New York | 164 |
| China | 146 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 3 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 4 |
| Does not meet standards | 8 |
Peer reviewedZehavi, N.; And Others – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 1987
A model was developed to find out whether teachers can predict the success of their students on a specific test. Implications for curriculum development and changes in classroom instruction are discussed. (RB)
Descriptors: Curriculum Development, Evaluation Criteria, Expectation, Instructional Improvement
Mullins, Carolyn – CAUSE/EFFECT, 1987
A systematic assessment procedure designed to increase success at buying supportable software is presented. Examples used are from programs for the IBM PC, but most comments apply to other software and to software for minicomputers and mainframes. (MLW)
Descriptors: Computer Software, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Guides
Peer reviewedGass, Robert H., Jr. – Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1987
Offers arguments in favor of condoning theoretical arguments and answers objections raised by critics of theoretical arguments. Recommends standards for improving the quality of theoretical arguments. (MM)
Descriptors: Debate, Evaluation Criteria, Higher Education, Persuasive Discourse
Tindell, James J. – School Business Affairs, 1987
Outlines the detailed tasks involved in development of specifications for purchasing requirements. Includes forms of open specifications, basic content, group terms, measurements, and the wording of specifications. (MD)
Descriptors: Criteria, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation, Planning
Peer reviewedWarnick, Barbara – Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1987
Claims that the narrative paradigm recently proposed as a model for rhetorical criticism is problematic because of internal contradictions and inconsistencies. Argues that independent sources are lacking for judging the adequacy of a critic's claims about a text. (JD)
Descriptors: Audience Analysis, Discourse Analysis, Evaluation Criteria, Models
Peer reviewedLincoln, Yvonna S.; Guba, Egon G. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1986
The emergence of a new, naturalistic, paradigm of inquiry has led to a demand for rigorous criteria that meet traditional standards of inquiry. Two sets are suggested, one of which, the "trustworthiness" criteria, parallels conventional criteria, while the second, "authenticity" criteria, is implied directly by new paradigm…
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Models, Observation, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedRowland, Robert C. – Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1984
Identifies the purpose of academic debate (to teach students argumentative skills) and the characteristics that a debate paradigm must have to fulfill that purpose. Takes a functional view of the debate judge as one who judges argumentative practices, not one who decides policy issues as would a real-world decision maker. (PD)
Descriptors: Debate, Evaluation Criteria, Higher Education, Judges
Kamil, Michael L. – Computers, Reading and Language Arts, 1984
Discusses the importance of two criteria often neglected on software evaluation forms: (1) the match between the instructor's objectives for a class and the objectives of the computer program and (2) the ease of transfer of the skills learned in the program to other situations. (AEA)
Descriptors: Computer Software, Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria, Teacher Response
Ivers, Patrick – Computers, Reading and Language Arts, 1984
Illustrates some of the problems and the advantages of three programs designed for language arts instruction: "English Volume I" (MECC), "English SAT 1" (Microlab), and "Vocabulary Prompter" (Jagdstaffel). (AEA)
Descriptors: Computer Software, Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria, Grammar
Peer reviewedWilliams, Peyton, Jr. – Exceptional Children, 1984
Fifty-six residential school adminstrators responded to a questionnaire on governance and policy issues. Results suggested seven conclusions, including that local school districts are the major source of referrals, there are no appreciable differences regionally in admissions policies, and parents are involved in placement, Individualized…
Descriptors: Admission Criteria, Deafness, Educational Policy, Residential Schools
Peer reviewedMcNutt, Gaye – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1986
To determine the degree of controversy or consensus regarding definitions at the state level, questionnaires focusing on six learning disability topics were sent to each state education agency (SEA) and the District of Columbia. In general, more consensus than controversy exists when broad areas are considered. Changes in some SEA definitions…
Descriptors: Criteria, Definitions, Disability Identification, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewedPolansky, Norman, A. – Child Welfare, 1986
Addresses the issues of why theory is practical and what makes a particular theory good. Theory serves a number of important functions (saves energy, mobilizes energy, and so on) in applied fields, such as social work. A good theory is dynamic, parsimonious, capable of resolving paradoxes, realistic, and comprehensive. (BB)
Descriptors: Counselor Client Relationship, Evaluation Criteria, Social Work, Social Workers
Peer reviewedSilverstein, A. B. – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1985
The findings of research on short forms of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales-Revised are used to illustrate points about three criteria for evaluating the usefulness of a short form. Results indicate there is little justification for regarding the three criteria as criteria. (Author/BL)
Descriptors: Correlation, Evaluation Criteria, Test Format, Test Interpretation
Peer reviewedDempsey, Richard H.; Hartman, David J. – Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1986
Discusses how paradigms, such as "tabula rasa," reduce the judge's influence as a critic. Suggests alternatives. (PD)
Descriptors: Debate, Evaluation Criteria, Higher Education, Judges
Peer reviewedSnider, Alfred C. – National Forensic Journal, 1984
Discusses guidelines for ethics in academic debate. Covers obligations of debaters and examples of unethical conduct. Proposes gaming as a way to study and regulate ethics. (PD)
Descriptors: Debate, Ethics, Evaluation Criteria, Game Theory


