Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 15 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 96 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 392 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 807 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 159 |
| Practitioners | 104 |
| Teachers | 29 |
| Counselors | 9 |
| Parents | 6 |
| Administrators | 5 |
| Policymakers | 2 |
| Students | 2 |
| Support Staff | 1 |
Location
| Turkey | 59 |
| Australia | 34 |
| California | 29 |
| Canada | 28 |
| China | 12 |
| Florida | 11 |
| Missouri | 11 |
| New York | 11 |
| Ohio | 11 |
| North Carolina | 10 |
| Pennsylvania | 10 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 2 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 2 |
| Does not meet standards | 1 |
CROFT, JOHN C. – 1965
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DOGMATISM ON THE PART OF SCHOOL PRINCIPALS AND ACCURACY OF OTHERS IN ESTIMATING THEIR LEADERSHIP BEHAVIOR WAS STUDIED. THE LEADER BEHAVIOR DESCRIPTION QUESTIONNAIRE (LBDQ) AND THE ROKEACH DOGMATISM SCALE (RDS) WERE THE INSTRUMENTS USED FOR MEASUREMENT. A SAMPLE OF 24 PRINCIPALS WAS SELECTED AND ADMINISTERED THE…
Descriptors: Administrators, Behavior Rating Scales, Dogmatism, Perception
ONG, JIN – 1966
A FOLLOWUP STUDY WAS REPORTED THAT ENLARGED THE SCOPE OF THE AUTHOR'S PREVIOUS STUDY OF THE OPPOSITE-FORM APPROACH USED BY STUDENTS IN TEST AND MEASUREMENT COURSES. THE STUDY HAD THREE PURPOSES--(1) TO INVESTIGATE THE RELIABILITIES OF OPPOSITE-FORM INVENTORIES, (2) TO CROSS VALIDATE OPPOSITE-FORM INVENTORIES, AND (3) TO STUDY THE PATTERNING OF…
Descriptors: Behavior Rating Scales, Personality Assessment, Test Results, Test Selection
Peer reviewedFein, Deborah – Developmental Psychology, 1976
This study examined the responses of kindergarten, first, third, and fourth grade girls to examples of good and bad behaviors followed either by good or bad outcomes. The results indicated that good behavior did not affect judgments of outcome but that a good outcome raised judgments of bad behavior. (JMB)
Descriptors: Behavior, Behavior Rating Scales, Elementary Education, Moral Development
Peer reviewedSt. Clair, Karen L. – Child Development, 1978
A historical review of neonatal assessment procedures is presented to demonstrate the trends in advancement of the field and attempts toward collaboration of medicine and psychology in contributions to the area. (Author/JMB)
Descriptors: Behavior Rating Scales, History, Infant Behavior, Interdisciplinary Approach
Peer reviewedWhalen, Carol K.; And Others – Child Development, 1987
Study examined peer sensitivity to (1) differences in the social behaviors of hyperactive and normal comparison peers, and (2) medication-related behavioral differences. Discussion focused on children's detection of treatment-related differences in social behaviors of peers, as well as on the imperfect relation between social behavior and social…
Descriptors: Behavior Problems, Behavior Rating Scales, Hyperactivity, Peer Evaluation
Peer reviewedMacDonald, Larry; Barton, Lyle E. – American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1986
The study assessed the degree to which rehabilitation staff rate severity of maladaptive behaviors on the Americal Association on Mental Deficiency Adaptive Behavior Scale and developed a socially validated revision of the scoring system to allow more accurate classification of mentally retarded individuals as having mild, moderate, or severe…
Descriptors: Adaptive Behavior (of Disabled), Behavior Rating Scales, Mental Retardation, Scoring Formulas
Peer reviewedEpstein, Michael H.; And Others – Behavioral Disorders, 1983
Adolescent boys and girls, identified as either behaviorally disordered (N=166) or normal (N=183), were rated by teachers on the Behavior Problem Checklist (BPC), with such results as significant differences for pupil category, BPC dimension, and category by dimension interaction, but no significant differences for sex. (MC)
Descriptors: Adolescents, Behavior Disorders, Behavior Problems, Behavior Rating Scales
Peer reviewedStiffman, Arlene R.; And Others – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 1984
Describes the development of the Behavior Rating Index for Children (BRIC), a 13-item summated category partition scale that provides a prothetic measure of children's behavior problems. Evaluation of the BRIC with 600 referred and nonreferred children suggested adequate reliability and validity. (JAC)
Descriptors: Behavior Problems, Behavior Rating Scales, Children, Elementary Secondary Education
Banks, Jane M. – American Vocational Journal, 1973
Three examples of performance goals written in the affective domain and two rating scales designed to help teachers use them. (Editor)
Descriptors: Affective Behavior, Affective Objectives, Behavior Rating Scales, Behavioral Objectives
Peer reviewedDilley, Josiah; And Others – Counselor Education and Supervision, 1973
Counselors without teaching experience were compared with counselors from the same graduate counselor education program with teaching experience and with other first-year counselors raters had known on each of five dimensions. It was concluded that teaching experience does not seem to be necessary for the preparation of competent school…
Descriptors: Behavior Rating Scales, Counseling Effectiveness, Counselor Training, Performance Factors
Peer reviewedBullock, Lyndal M.; Brown, R. Keith – Exceptional Children, 1972
One hundred twelve teachers of emotionally disturbed children were asked to itemize principal behavioral problems and also to rate each child on the Behavioral Dimensions Rating Scale. (DB)
Descriptors: Aggression, Behavior Rating Scales, Emotional Disturbances, Exceptional Child Research
Anderson, Harry E.; and others – Educ Psychol Meas, 1969
A validity study of the relevance to maturity of the 18 items that comprise the Kim-Anderson-Bashaw Child Behavior Scales is discussed. (DB)
Descriptors: Behavior Rating Scales, Child Development, Elementary School Students, Maturity (Individuals)
Golightly, Carole; And Others – Develop Psychol, 1970
Descriptors: Behavior Rating Scales, Item Analysis, Measurement Instruments, Test Reliability
Peer reviewedRoss, Robert T. – American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1971
Factor analyses of ratings received by 617 patients in a state hospital for the mentally retarded, concerning 26 problem behaviors, indicated that five factors describe the behaviors. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Behavior Problems, Behavior Rating Scales, Institutionalized Persons
Peer reviewedSong, R. H.; Song, A. Y. – Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1971
Supported was the hypothesis that retardates classified as better workers can be significatly different from those classified as poor workers in the scale ratings provided by their supervisors. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Rating Scales, Instrumentation, Measurement Instruments, Mental Retardation


