NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 106 to 120 of 5,686 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yuehai Xiao; Angel Zhao – European Journal of Psychology of Education, 2025
Some previous researchers attempted to bridge the gap between two bodies of research: the role of metacognitive knowledge in second language (L2) writing and L2 collaborative writing (CW). Although recent studies unveiled the positive impacts of learners' metacognitive knowledge on L2 collaborative writing, there is not yet consensus regarding the…
Descriptors: Metacognition, Second Language Instruction, Second Language Learning, Collaborative Writing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sherron Killingsworth Roberts; Earlisha Whitfield – Early Childhood Education Journal, 2025
This content analysis examined the evaluative components of elementary, high-stakes, state standardized writing sample rubrics. We explored the ten most populated states in the United States, and thus most influential states, to yield salient trends in writing evaluation for early grades. Using Spandel's analytical traits as our conceptual…
Descriptors: Scoring Rubrics, Writing Evaluation, Trend Analysis, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gabriel Andrade-Hidalgo; Pedro Mio-Cango; Orlando Iparraguirre-Villanueva – Journal of Academic Ethics, 2025
The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has profoundly transformed many people's lives, ChatGPT being a clear example, whose capabilities have substantially influenced the automation of tasks such as writing texts and providing information sources for researchers. This review article aims to understand the impact of AI on academic…
Descriptors: Literature Reviews, Meta Analysis, Artificial Intelligence, Ethics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jussi S. Jauhiainen; Agustín Garagorry Guerra – Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 2025
The study highlights ChatGPT-4's potential in educational settings for the evaluation of university students' open-ended written examination responses. ChatGPT-4 evaluated 54 written responses, ranging from 24 to 256 words in English. It assessed each response using five criteria and assigned a grade on a six-point scale from fail to excellent,…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Technology Uses in Education, Student Evaluation, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Aranzazu Bea Reyes; Carmen Rodríguez-Gonzalo – Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics / Revue canadienne de linguistique appliquée, 2025
The importance of revision has been recognised by numerous scholars of the teaching and learning of writing (Abad & Rodríguez-Gonzalo, 2023; Bereiter & Scardamalia, 1987; Camps, 2020; Horning & Becker, 2006), especially if it is understood as a recursive and transversal phase that affects all levels of language (Álvarez Angulo, 2011;…
Descriptors: College Students, Collaborative Writing, Revision (Written Composition), Error Correction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Megan McIntyre – Composition Forum, 2025
In response to a growing awareness of the oppressive foundations of educational institutions, literacy educators have turned to antiracist, culturally responsive (Alim and Paris; Paris), and equitable teaching and assessment practices to combat the inequities (colonialism, racism, sexism, homophobia, ableism, etc.) on which our institutions are…
Descriptors: Writing (Composition), Equal Education, Racism, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yue Huang; Joshua Wilson; Henry May – International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2025
Automated writing evaluation (AWE) is an artificial intelligence (AI)-empowered educational technology designed to assist writing instruction and improve students' writing proficiency. The present study adopted a quasi-experimental design using the inverse probability of treatment weighting method to explore the long-term effects of an AWE system…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Automation, Computer Uses in Education, Artificial Intelligence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Friedrich, Nicola; Stagg Peterson, Shelley – Early Years: An International Journal of Research and Development, 2023
In this study, we make the case for using texts children create as part of their play as a means for assessing their developing print literacy knowledge. We assessed 4- and 5-year-old children's authentic texts using categories and criteria from the "Assessing Young Children's Marks/Drawing/Print" tool, a research-based, classroom…
Descriptors: Play, Writing (Composition), Kindergarten, Young Children
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tessier, Jack T.; Tessier, Lisa M.; Gashler, Daniel; Levitt, Cheryle; London, Julie; West, Benjamin S.; Winters, Nancy – College Teaching, 2023
College faculty faces decisions about how to provide feedback on written work. We compared the quality of student writing and student impressions of feedback from both full and minimal markup methods. There was only one significant difference in the quality of writing or content between full and minimal markup. Students scored the functionality of…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Writing Instruction, Writing Improvement, Writing Skills
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ye, Wei; Ren, Wei – Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2023
Integrated writing has gained importance in both tertiary and secondary learning contexts. However, assessment tasks at secondary schools have received little attention. To obtain evidence of skill integration, a task-defining feature for integrated writing, we developed a comprehensive questionnaire study of an understudied task used in the…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Writing Evaluation, Writing Skills
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rakovic, Mladen; Iqbal, Sehrish; Li, Tongguang; Fan, Yizhou; Singh, Shaveen; Surendrannair, Surya; Kilgour, Jonathan; Graaf, Joep; Lim, Lyn; Molenaar, Inge; Bannert, Maria; Moore, Johanna; Gaševic, Dragan – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2023
Background: Assignments that involve writing based on several texts are challenging to many learners. Formative feedback supporting learners in these tasks should be informed by the characteristics of evolving written product and by the characteristics of learning processes learners enacted while developing the product. However, formative feedback…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Essays, High Achievement, Writing Achievement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Verity Aiken – Teaching in Higher Education, 2023
A theoretical understanding is offered to help explore how students attempt to reconcile divergent narratives around the purposes of Higher Education in relation to their own writing. Drawing from the twin notions of centripetal and centrifugal forces, the paper discusses the ways that students both follow and resist convention in their own…
Descriptors: Writing (Composition), Undergraduate Students, Student Attitudes, Academic Language
Angela V. Peterson – ProQuest LLC, 2024
Results from national and state writing assessments suggest teachers struggle to meet the writing needs of students with disabilities as they score significantly lower than the overall population. With the implementation of Common Core State Standards in 2010, text-based writing became increasingly important for academic success both in the…
Descriptors: Middle School Students, Students with Disabilities, Writing Instruction, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Fiona Richards; Nigel Harwood – International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2024
This article presents a research-based stakeholder tool informed by a study of the various types of changes proofreaders may make when proofreading a student text. Whilst the tool can be used to advise higher education students, (non-)professional proofreaders/editors, English for Academic Purposes (EAP) lecturers, writing centre tutors, and…
Descriptors: Proofreading, Writing Evaluation, Revision (Written Composition), English for Academic Purposes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hakyung Sung; Sooyeon Cho; Kristopher Kyle – Language Assessment Quarterly, 2024
Lexical diversity (LD) is an important indicator of second language lexical development. Much research has investigated LD indices, with a focus on learners of English. However, further research is needed in languages that are typologically distinct from English, such as Korean. In this study, we evaluated the reliability and validity of LD…
Descriptors: Second Language Learning, Korean, Persuasive Discourse, Language Tests
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12  |  ...  |  380