NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 1 to 15 of 5,686 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Maja Stanko-Kaczmarek; Lilianna Dera; Halszka Koscielska – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2025
In the rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence (AI) literature generation, understanding how society perceives AI-generated content, compared with human-produced literature is of paramount importance. This study investigated societal perceptions and biases toward AI-generated versus human-produced poetry. A sample of 123 participants was…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Creativity, Poetry, Bias
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Alan Huebner; Gustaf B. Skar; Mengchen Huang – Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2025
Generalizability theory is a modern and powerful framework for conducting reliability analyses. It is flexible to accommodate both random and fixed facets. However, there has been a relative scarcity in the practical literature on how to handle the fixed facet case. This article aims to provide practitioners a conceptual understanding and…
Descriptors: Generalizability Theory, Multivariate Analysis, Statistical Analysis, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yujia Liu; Emily K. Penner; Sabrina Solanki; Xuehan Zhou – Journal of Education Human Resources, 2025
Identifying high-quality educators at the point of hire can reduce future recruitment costs and minimize the impact of attrition on school organizations and student learning. One low-cost way to screen applicants and learn about their beliefs, values, and pedagogy is through their short-essay writing samples. However, there is limited research…
Descriptors: Teacher Selection, Screening Tests, Essays, Job Applicants
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jennifer Manning; Jeffrey Baldwin; Natasha Powell – Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 2025
As ChatGPT continues to reshape student engagement and instructional design, it is crucial to examine its practical implications. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of ChatGPT3.5 and ChatGPT4 as potential automated essay scoring (AES) systems. Fifty authentic, student-written annotated bibliographies were evaluated by three human raters…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Essays, Writing Evaluation, Artificial Intelligence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Michelle Sonnenberg; Carolyn Gubala; Justiss Burry; Jessica Griffith; Tanya Zarlengo; Lisa Melonçon – Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 2024
We use a continuous improvement model to evaluate an information design assignment by analyzing 120 student drafts and finals alongside instructor feedback. Using data from across sections (N = 118), we illustrate a process focused on improving student learning that other technical and professional communication program administrators and faculty…
Descriptors: Assignments, Feedback (Response), Writing Evaluation, Learning Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yi Xue – Education and Information Technologies, 2024
The new era of generative artificial intelligence has sparked the blossoming academic fireworks in the realm of education and information technologies. Driven by natural language processing (NLP), automated writing evaluation (AWE) tools become a ubiquitous practice in intelligent computer-assisted language learning (CALL) environments. Based on…
Descriptors: Literature Reviews, Meta Analysis, Bibliometrics, Artificial Intelligence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cherish M. Sarmiento; Adrea J. Truckenmiller; Eunsoo Cho; Heqiao Wang – British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2025
Background: Learning to write the complex academic language (AL) associated with a discipline (like science) is a critical task in education, with middle school being a key developmental period. However, we need more research to guide how we assess students' learning to write AL, especially if we want to create assessment that guides more…
Descriptors: Academic Language, Middle School Students, Grade 5, Grade 8
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Scott A. Crossley; Minkyung Kim; Quian Wan; Laura K. Allen; Rurik Tywoniw; Danielle S. McNamara – Grantee Submission, 2025
This study examines the potential to use non-expert, crowd-sourced raters to score essays by comparing expert raters' and crowd-sourced raters' assessments of writing quality. Expert raters and crowd-sourced raters scored 400 essays using a standardised holistic rubric and comparative judgement (pairwise ratings) scoring techniques, respectively.…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Essays, Novices, Knowledge Level
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Scott A. Crossley; Minkyung Kim; Qian Wan; Laura K. Allen; Rurik Tywoniw; Danielle McNamara – Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2025
This study examines the potential to use non-expert, crowd-sourced raters to score essays by comparing expert raters' and crowd-sourced raters' assessments of writing quality. Expert raters and crowd-sourced raters scored 400 essays using a standardised holistic rubric and comparative judgement (pairwise ratings) scoring techniques, respectively.…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Essays, Novices, Knowledge Level
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rachael Ruegg – Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2025
Many previous studies have compared automated analyses to writing experts' assessments, and less is known about the relationship between such features and content instructors' assessments of writing. The data analysed in this study is part of a larger study investigating growth in academic writing skills during undergraduate study. In this…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, College Freshmen, Writing Assignments, Humanities Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Karima Bouziane; Abdelmounim Bouziane – Discover Education, 2024
The evaluation of student essay corrections has become a focal point in understanding the evolving role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education. This study aims to assess the accuracy, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness of ChatGPT's essay correction compared to human correction, with a primary focus on identifying and rectifying grammatical…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Essays, Writing Skills, Grammar
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Betzabe Torres Olave – Review of Education, Pedagogy & Cultural Studies, 2024
In this article, I think with trains to reflect about education, its rhythms, trajectories, and the possibilities that "attentive looking through windows" can afford us in moving toward just futures. Using two of Alfonsina Storni's poems, the yellow train of "Cien años de soledad" as well as educational philosophy, I argue that…
Descriptors: Transportation, Attention, Ethics, Time
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Joan Li; Nikhil Kumar Jangamreddy; Ryuto Hisamoto; Ruchita Bhansali; Amalie Dyda; Luke Zaphir; Mashhuda Glencross – Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2024
Generative artificial intelligence technologies, such as ChatGPT, bring an unprecedented change in education by leveraging the power of natural language processing and machine learning. Employing ChatGPT to assist with marking written assessment presents multiple advantages including scalability, improved consistency, eliminating biases associated…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Artificial Intelligence, Grading, Scoring Rubrics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Katherine A. Valentine; Adrea J. Truckenmiller – Intervention in School and Clinic, 2025
Educators are faced with many decisions regarding supporting students' writing. While writing achievement and curriculum-based measure scores provide numbers that are important for high-stakes decisions like determining special education eligibility, they do not provide educators with information on a student's explicit instruction needs. Written…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Writing Skills, Student Evaluation, Special Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Huahui Zhao; Thi Ngoc Yen Dang; Natalie Finlayson – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2025
Research has revealed that critical thinking (CT) can predict undergraduate academic performance well. It is essential for nurturing students' unique voice and creativity, especially in the era of Large Language Models (LLMs). LLMs can generate linguistically complex texts, potentially overshadowing students' authorial voices--particularly those…
Descriptors: Critical Thinking, Graduate Students, Writing (Composition), Intellectual Disciplines
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  ...  |  380