Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 25 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 121 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 250 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 576 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 38 |
| Practitioners | 25 |
| Teachers | 8 |
| Administrators | 6 |
| Counselors | 3 |
| Policymakers | 2 |
| Parents | 1 |
| Students | 1 |
Location
| Taiwan | 12 |
| United Kingdom | 10 |
| Australia | 9 |
| Netherlands | 9 |
| California | 8 |
| New York | 8 |
| Turkey | 8 |
| Germany | 7 |
| Canada | 6 |
| Florida | 6 |
| Japan | 6 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Rosen, Gerald A. – 2000
Computer-based testing places great burdens on all involved parties to ensure test security. A task analysis of test site security might identify the areas of protecting the test, protecting the data, and protecting the environment as essential issues in test security. Protecting the test involves transmission of the examinations, identifying the…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Testing Problems
Peer reviewedvan der Linden, Wim J.; Chang, Hua-Hua – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2003
Combined the methods of alpha-stratified adaptive testing and constrained adaptive testing with shadow tests. Outlines the advantages of this approach in reducing overexposure and underexposure of items in an item pool and illustrates these advantages with an example from the Law School Admission Test. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Item Banks
Peer reviewedChang, Shun-Wen; Ansley, Timothy N. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2003
Compared the properties of five methods of item exposure control in the context of estimating examinees' abilities in a computerized adaptive testing situation. Findings show advantages to the Stocking and Lewis conditional multinomial procedure (M. Stocking and C. Lewis, 1995) and, to a lesser degree, the Davy and Parshall method (T. Davey and C.…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Test Items
Peer reviewedXiao, Beiling – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1999
Evaluated three strategies for assigning examinees to grading categories in computerized adaptive testing. The expected a posteriori-based method had more correct classifications in the middle range of grade levels and more errors for the extremes than the golden section search grading test and the Z-score grading test. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Classification, Computer Assisted Testing, Grading
Huang, Yueh-Min; Lin, Yen-Ting; Cheng, Shu-Chen – Computers & Education, 2009
With the rapid growth of computer and mobile technology, it is a challenge to integrate computer based test (CBT) with mobile learning (m-learning) especially for formative assessment and self-assessment. In terms of self-assessment, computer adaptive test (CAT) is a proper way to enable students to evaluate themselves. In CAT, students are…
Descriptors: Self Evaluation (Individuals), Test Items, Formative Evaluation, Educational Assessment
Papanastasiou, Elena C.; Reckase, Mark D. – International Journal of Testing, 2007
Because of the increased popularity of computerized adaptive testing (CAT), many admissions tests, as well as certification and licensure examinations, have been transformed from their paper-and-pencil versions to computerized adaptive versions. A major difference between paper-and-pencil tests and CAT from an examinee's point of view is that in…
Descriptors: Simulation, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Test Items
van der Linden, Wim J.; Veldkamp, Bernard P. – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2007
Two conditional versions of the exposure-control method with item-ineligibility constraints for adaptive testing in van der Linden and Veldkamp (2004) are presented. The first version is for unconstrained item selection, the second for item selection with content constraints imposed by the shadow-test approach. In both versions, the exposure rates…
Descriptors: Law Schools, Adaptive Testing, Item Analysis, Probability
Sidener, David W. – Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 2006
The following paper describes Lowenkron's model of joint (stimulus) control. Joint control is described as a means of accounting for performances, especially generalized performances, for which a history of contingency control does not provide an adequate account. Examples are provided to illustrate instances in which joint control may facilitate…
Descriptors: Stimuli, Performance, Adaptive Testing, Models
Wood, R. – Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 1976
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Bayesian Statistics, Intelligence Tests, Test Construction
Peer reviewedPrimus, Michael A.; Thompson, Gary – Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1985
An operant conditioning discrimination paradigm was evaluated of relationships between response behavior of young children and two stimulus components of the paradigm, the discriminative stimulus and the reinforcing stimulus. Findings revealed the effects of schedules of reinforcement, novel reinforcement, and age. (Author/CL)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Audiometric Tests, Disabilities, Infants
Meijer, Rob R.; van Krimpen-Stoop, Edith M. L. A. – 2003
In this study a cumulative-sum (CUSUM) procedure from the theory of Statistical Process Control was modified and applied in the context of person-fit analysis in a computerized adaptive testing (CAT) environment. Six person-fit statistics were proposed using the CUSUM procedure, and three of them could be used to investigate the CAT in online test…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Simulation, Test Construction
Peer reviewedMeijer, Rob R. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2003
This book provides a general overview of computer based testing (CBT) and aims at an audience of practitioners and graduate students. The book discusses all aspects of BT without going into psychometric detail. This nontechnical and basic book is recommended as a textbook for students or new researchers. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Testing Problems, Textbooks
Peer reviewedLatu, Elisapesi; Chapman, Elaine – British Journal of Educational Technology, 2002
Considers the potential of computer adaptive testing (CAT). Discusses the use of CAT instead of traditional paper and pencil tests, identifies decisions that impact the efficacy of CAT, and concludes that CAT is beneficial when used to its full potential on certain types of tests. (LRW)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Intermode Differences, Tests
Peer reviewedBradlow, Eric T.; Weiss, Robert E. – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2001
Compares four methods that map outlier statistics to a familiarity probability scale (a "P" value). Explored these methods in the context of computerized adaptive test data from a 1995 nationally administered computerized examination for professionals in the medical industry. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Probability, Test Construction
Peer reviewedvan Krimpen-Stoop, Edith M. L. A.; Meijer, Rob R. – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2001
Proposed person-fit statistics that are designed for use in a computerized adaptive test (CAT) and derived critical values for these statistics using cumulative sum (CUSUM) procedures so that item-score patterns can be classified as fitting or misfitting. Compared nominal Type I errors with empirical Type I errors through simulation studies. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Simulation, Test Construction

Direct link
