Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 410 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 2128 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 5097 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 8377 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Kalyuga, Slava | 36 |
| Sweller, John | 32 |
| Paas, Fred | 30 |
| Hiebert, Elfrieda H. | 24 |
| Tindal, Gerald | 23 |
| Alonzo, Julie | 19 |
| Costley, Jamie | 18 |
| Hwang, Gwo-Jen | 17 |
| McNamara, Danielle S. | 17 |
| Plake, Barbara S. | 14 |
| Huang, Yueh-Min | 13 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 352 |
| Teachers | 280 |
| Researchers | 187 |
| Policymakers | 139 |
| Administrators | 43 |
| Students | 22 |
| Parents | 8 |
| Counselors | 5 |
| Media Staff | 5 |
| Community | 2 |
| Support Staff | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| Turkey | 254 |
| China | 231 |
| Australia | 220 |
| Germany | 176 |
| Taiwan | 145 |
| Canada | 142 |
| Indonesia | 125 |
| United Kingdom | 124 |
| United States | 105 |
| California | 101 |
| South Korea | 97 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 3 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 4 |
| Does not meet standards | 3 |
Lawrence, Ida M.; Dorans, Neil J. – 1994
This paper describes findings from two studies involving optional use of calculators on Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) mathematical items. The first study looked at the effects of calculator use on estimates of item difficulty. The second study looked at the effect of calculator use on equating results from an anchor test design. Study 1,…
Descriptors: Calculators, College Entrance Examinations, Difficulty Level, Equated Scores
Chang, Te-Sheng – 2000
The purpose of this study was to construct regression models that can identify sources of desired or undesired influences on student ratings. The approach uses course effectiveness findings developed with regression models to identify a possible solution to the two problems in using student ratings as a major component of course effectiveness: (1)…
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Evaluation Methods, Foreign Countries, Higher Education
Peer reviewedVillard, Henry H. – Journal of Economic Education, 1973
A summary of some recent research on student evaluation of teaching is presented. Comment is made on the impact of the open admissions policy at City University of New York. The author theorizes that the more formal the use of student evaluations, the more rapidly will average grades drift upward and average level at which courses are taught drift…
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Educational Research, Educational Theories, Grades (Scholastic)
Peer reviewedThurlow, Martha L.; Turnure, James E. – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1972
Study investigated the effects of task difficulty on the paired-associate learning of retardates when extended elaboration conditions are employed. (Authors)
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Mild Mental Retardation, Paired Associate Learning, Recall (Psychology)
Peer reviewedRichardson, Leroy; Soucar, Emil – Psychological Reports, 1971
Descriptors: Achievement, Adjustment (to Environment), Cognitive Development, Cognitive Processes
Peer reviewedKoenke, Karl – Journal of Reading, 1971
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Evaluation Methods, Measurement Instruments, Readability
Zellner, Miriam – J Personality Soc Psychol, 1970
Descriptors: Attitude Change, Behavioral Science Research, Difficulty Level, Health
Clymer, Theodore – Int Reading Assn Conf Proc Pt2, 1968
Presents a critical assessment of reading research quality through the discussion of background factors which have had major impact, and lists problems currently emphasized or neglected in research. Includes a pro-reaction and a con-reaction paper. Bibliography. (WB)
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Educational Trends, Evaluation Criteria, Financial Support
Korman, Abraham K. – J Appl Psychol, 1970
Descriptors: Behavioral Science Research, Difficulty Level, Interpersonal Relationship, Literature Reviews
Hinrichs, J. R. – J Appl Psychol, 1970
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Behavioral Science Research, College Students, Difficulty Level
Peer reviewedBowey, Judith A. – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1982
Three experimental tasks were devised to assess the nature of memory processing limitations in fourth-graders' oral reading comprehension. (Author/MP)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Difficulty Level, Elementary Education, Elementary School Students
Peer reviewedSolomon, Joan – Physics Education, 1983
Interviews were conducted and tests were administered to determine if students found chemistry or physics easier. Reasons for their choices (including the fact that physics was perceived as relating to the life/world domain) and type knowledge used by the students are discussed. (JN)
Descriptors: Chemistry, Classroom Research, Comprehension, Difficulty Level
Peer reviewedHalpin, Glennelle; And Others – Educational Research Quarterly, 1981
With college graduate students in actual classroom settings, the effects of taking a recall test, a recognition test, or no test on retention four weeks later were studied. Results indicated that simply taking an exam had no significant effect on retention. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Concept Formation, Difficulty Level, Higher Education
Peer reviewedAment, Richard P.; And Others – Journal of Medical Education, 1981
The differences between teaching and nonteaching hospitals in complexity and variety of cases seen are described. The results show that teaching hospitals could be expected to cost somewhat more per patient even if case mix were the only factor. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Cost Effectiveness, Costs, Difficulty Level
Peer reviewedSlinde, Jeffrey A.; Linn, Robert L. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1979
The Rasch model was used to equate reading comprehension tests of widely different difficulty for three groups of fifth grade students of widely different ability. Under these extreme circumstances, the Rasch model equating was unsatisfactory. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Academic Ability, Bias, Difficulty Level, Equated Scores


