Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 19 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 76 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 191 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 386 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 274 |
| Researchers | 122 |
| Teachers | 102 |
| Administrators | 63 |
| Counselors | 28 |
| Parents | 21 |
| Policymakers | 21 |
| Students | 15 |
| Community | 8 |
Location
| Canada | 45 |
| Australia | 33 |
| California | 33 |
| United Kingdom | 23 |
| United States | 20 |
| Pennsylvania | 18 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 17 |
| New York | 15 |
| Japan | 14 |
| Michigan | 14 |
| New Jersey | 12 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedReiter, Henry – Psychological Reports, 1971
Descriptors: Anxiety, College Students, Comparative Testing, Intelligence
Peer reviewedJohnson, Dale L.; Johnson, Carmen A. – Psychological Reports, 1971
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Cultural Influences, Disadvantaged, Intellectual Development
Peer reviewedSullivan, John J. – Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 1971
The author examines the tests of the IEA International Study of Mathematics Achievement that were given to the 13-year-old subjects. In particular, he investigates the appropriateness of the tests for U.S. students and concludes that with respect to the material for which the U.S. students should be held responsible, they did well. (CT)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Elementary School Mathematics, Evaluation, International Education
Simon, William E. – Percept Mot Skills, 1970
Descriptors: College Students, Interpersonal Relationship, Measurement Instruments, Rating Scales
Rippey, Robert M. – Psychol Rep, 1970
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, College Students, Decision Making Skills, Multiple Choice Tests
Fredrick, Wayne C. – Psychol Rep, 1970
Descriptors: Child Development, Educational Development, Grade 8, Grammar
Peer reviewedWeisberg, Paul – Psychological Reports, 1970
Descriptors: College Students, Freehand Drawing, Individual Differences, Personality Measures
Peer reviewedCoupland, D. E. – International Labour Review, 1970
Explains why in the United States the feeling is increasing that much of the aptitude testing now being done discriminates against minority group members seeking employment. Skeptical of eliminating the discriminatory aspects of testing, the article raises the question of eliminating testing itself. (DM)
Descriptors: Aptitude Tests, Cultural Influences, Environmental Influences, Equal Opportunities (Jobs)
Kasdon, Lawrence M. – Int Reading Assn Conf Proc Pt 4, 1968
Descriptors: Ghettos, Grade 9, Oral Reading, Reading Ability
Goldman, Leo – Meas Evaluation Guidance, 1969
Descriptors: Behavior Change, Counseling Effectiveness, Counselor Role, Evaluation
Campbell, Mary – Engl Quart, 1970
Critically discusses existing objective tests of students' language abilities. (RD)
Descriptors: College Bound Students, Evaluation Methods, Language Skills, Objective Tests
Ohnmacht, Fred W. – Psychol Rep, 1970
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, College Students, Comparative Testing, Correlation
Kuder, Frederic – Meas Evaluation Guidance, 1969
Descriptors: Career Choice, Correlation, Interest Inventories, Measurement Techniques
Peer reviewedBlau, Gary; Katerberg, Ralph – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1982
Two predictions derived from the view that agreeing response set is a personality manifestation were tested: (a) nay-sayers maintain more belief consistency than do yea-sayers, and (b) nay-sayers are more intellectually oriented, while yea-sayers are more emotionally oriented. Both predictions were supported using Air Force trainee subjects.…
Descriptors: Adults, Interviews, Longitudinal Studies, Personality Assessment
Comparative Factor Analyses of the Personal Attributes Questionnaire and the Bem Sex-Role Inventory.
Peer reviewedAntill, John K.; Cunningham, John D. – Social Behavior and Personality, 1982
Compared the Personal Attributes Questionnaire (PAQ) and the Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI) as measures of androgyny. Results showed that femininty (Concern for Others) and masculinity (Dominance) accounted for most of the variance, but for PAQ, clusters of male- and female-valued items (i.e., Extroversion and Insecurity) formed subsidiary factors.…
Descriptors: Androgyny, College Students, Comparative Testing, Factor Analysis
