Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 39 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 161 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 395 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 683 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 190 |
| Teachers | 112 |
| Researchers | 46 |
| Administrators | 19 |
| Students | 13 |
| Media Staff | 9 |
| Policymakers | 5 |
| Community | 1 |
| Parents | 1 |
Location
| Canada | 26 |
| Turkey | 23 |
| Australia | 22 |
| Indonesia | 22 |
| United Kingdom | 21 |
| United States | 20 |
| China | 16 |
| California | 15 |
| Japan | 15 |
| Texas | 14 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 12 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Mullins, Carolyn J. – CAUSE/EFFECT, 1983
Effective communication depends on several ingredients including an appropriate readability level and thorough analysis of the audience. Readability levels and audience analysis are discussed, with implications for researchers and other technical personnel. (MLW)
Descriptors: Audiences, Communication (Thought Transfer), Communication Skills, Higher Education
Peer reviewedVande Kopple, William J. – Research in the Teaching of English, 1983
Examines whether a discourse consistent with functional sentence perspective (FSP) theory, which predicts how units of information should be distributed in a sentence and how sentences should be related in a discourse, is more memorable and readable than one contradictory to FSP. (HOD)
Descriptors: Cohesion (Written Composition), Discourse Analysis, Language Research, Linguistic Theory
Peer reviewedMcKinney, Ernestine Williams – Reading Improvement, 1983
Analysis of third-grade books in the New Macmillan Reading Program reveals that the books exceeded the publisher's designation of readability and did not progress in difficulty from easy to more difficult. Findings suggest the need for more complete and reliable information from publishers concerning textbook readability. (FL)
Descriptors: Basal Reading, Content Analysis, Grade 3, Primary Education
Peer reviewedJournal of Reading, 1983
Discusses two computer applications to reading instruction: modification of a computer program that calculates readability and criteria for evaluating language arts software. (AEA)
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Computer Programs, Computers, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewedDavison, Alice; Kantor, Robert N. – Reading Research Quarterly, 1982
Argues against the implicit use of readability formulas as guides to writing graded texts and urges experimental research to define the real factors constituting readability. (AEA)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Predictive Validity, Readability Formulas, Reading Research
Peer reviewedKennedy, Keith – American Biology Teacher, 1979
Describes how to use a readability graph to determine the reading level of Biology textbooks. (MA)
Descriptors: Biology, Literacy, Readability, Reading Level
Peer reviewedIrwin, Judith Westphal – Journal of Reading Behavior, 1980
Examines the relationship between the number of cohesive ties in a passage, as defined by M. Halliday and R. Hasan, and free and prompted recall scores. (HOD)
Descriptors: Cohesion (Written Composition), College Students, Higher Education, Linguistics
Peer reviewedHansell, T. Stevenson – Journal of Reading, 1981
Suggests using readability formulas, a skills inventory, an introspective report, and diagnostic approaches based on models of comprehension as informal evaluations of students' content reading ability. (MKM)
Descriptors: Content Area Reading, Informal Reading Inventories, Readability, Reading Ability
Peer reviewedJournal of Reading, 1981
Presents a checklist developed by the International Reading Association's Committee for Basic Education and Reading, which is designed to help teachers select materials to meet the special needs and interests of adult basic education learners and to make objective judgments based on a clear evaluation process. (MKM)
Descriptors: Adult Basic Education, Check Lists, Content Analysis, Readability Formulas
Peer reviewedAndrasik, Frank; And Others – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1981
Reading grade levels were obtained for 11 commonly employed self-report assertion inventories by use of the Flesch Reading Ease Formula. Directions for the inventories ranged from the seventh-grade to college graduate reading grade level. Inventory items were more readable, with scores ranging from the seventh- to the twelfth-grade level. (Author)
Descriptors: Assertiveness, Measures (Individuals), Readability, Reading Comprehension
Henderson, Jennifer – Australian Journal of Reading, 1979
Presents results of a study of two-level reading books; concludes that it seems worthwhile to use two-level readers experimentally in schools. (AEA)
Descriptors: Basal Reading, Elementary Education, Readability, Reading Comprehension
Peer reviewedFitzgerald, Gisela G. – Reading Teacher, 1979
Cites studies in which the reading level of workbooks designed to accompany basal readers has been found to be several years higher than the reading level of the basal text. (MKM)
Descriptors: Basal Reading, Beginning Reading, Elementary Education, Readability
The Effects of Line Length and Paragraph Denotation on the Retrieval of Information from Prose Text.
Peer reviewedHartley, James; And Others – Visible Language, 1978
Results of a study involving approximately 500 sixth and seventh graders suggest that a two-column layout with traditional paragraphing denotation is more readable than a single-column layout, but that an extreme line length does not place an undue strain on the reader. (Examples of the two formats are included.) (GT)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Elementary Education, Layout (Publications), Paragraphs
Peer reviewedKennedy, Keith – Physics Teacher, 1979
Discusses reading levels of books in the sciences, and explains the use of the Readability Graph. Also reported are reading levels of selected high school physics texts. (GA)
Descriptors: Books, Educational Media, Physics, Readability
Peer reviewedNilagupta, Sirirat – Journal of Reading, 1977
Reports on an investigation of the effect of syntax on the comprehension of written English by Thai college students who have studied English as a foreign language. (HOD)
Descriptors: College Students, English (Second Language), Readability, Reading Comprehension


