Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 39 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 161 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 395 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 683 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 190 |
| Teachers | 112 |
| Researchers | 46 |
| Administrators | 19 |
| Students | 13 |
| Media Staff | 9 |
| Policymakers | 5 |
| Community | 1 |
| Parents | 1 |
Location
| Canada | 26 |
| Turkey | 23 |
| Australia | 22 |
| Indonesia | 22 |
| United Kingdom | 21 |
| United States | 20 |
| China | 16 |
| California | 15 |
| Japan | 15 |
| Texas | 14 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 12 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedHetherington, Anne – TESL Canada Journal, 1985
Examines the traditional criteria for evaluating first and second language reading texts. Proposes that, if reading is interaction between a text and a reader, variables related to the reader's side of the process, global textual properties, content characteristics, and rhetorical and discourse features should be considered before linguistic…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Readability Formulas, Reader Text Relationship, Reading Material Selection
Peer reviewedThompson, Karen – English Quarterly, 1984
Describes the problems inherent in teaching native Canadian Indian literature selections and explores the problems in finding high quality native literature to use in classes with increasing numbers of native Indians enrolled. (CRH)
Descriptors: American Indian Literature, Canada Natives, English Curriculum, Higher Education
Peer reviewedBeck, Isabel L; And Others – Reading Research Quarterly, 1984
Revised two stories from basal readers to improve their coherence without altering their plots. Revisions increased the difficulty of the passages as indexed by readability formulas but enhanced comprehension of both skilled and less skilled readers. (FL)
Descriptors: Academic Aptitude, Cognitive Processes, Coherence, Grade 3
Peer reviewedSpeigel, Dixie Lee; Wright, Jill D. – Journal of Reading, 1983
Discusses a study designed to explore teachers' attitudes toward text selection, focusing on text characteristics and reasons for a particular selection. (AEA)
Descriptors: Biology, Content Area Reading, Readability Formulas, Reading Research
Peer reviewedSmith, Lawrence L. – Reading Horizons, 1984
Describes two modifications to the SMOG Readability Formula designed to make it more useful for primary and intermediate grade materials. (FL)
Descriptors: Intermediate Grades, Primary Education, Readability Formulas, Reading Comprehension
Mancall, Jacqueline Cooper – Drexel Library Quarterly, 1976
Survey of criteria and procedures used by children's book publishers in selecting beginning reading books. Discusses relationship of these practices to the role of the media specialist in the teaching of reading. (KP)
Descriptors: Beginning Reading, Books, Childrens Literature, Library Material Selection
Peer reviewedGillen, Barry; And Others – Teaching of Psychology, 1977
Twenty-seven social psychology textbooks were rated for Flesch readability, student readability, Flesch interest, student interest, and student recommendation. (ND)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Content Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education
Stenner, A. Jackson – 1999
The Lexile Framework provides teachers with tools to help them link the results of reading assessment with subsequent instruction, focuses on appropriate-level curriculum for readers at all educational levels, and is designed to be flexible enough to use alongside any type of reading program. Suggested areas for application of this system include:…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Readability Formulas, Reading Diagnosis, Reading Fluency
Peer reviewedCulhane, Joseph W. – Clearing House, 1973
Article outlined steps designed to help the teacher arrive at a more realistic indication of the ability of each student to handle basic instructional materials. (Author/RK)
Descriptors: Academic Ability, Cloze Procedure, Decision Making, Instructional Materials
Peer reviewedDoran, Rodney L.; Sheard, Doris M. – School Science and Mathematics, 1974
Discusses categories for science textbook analysis under the headings of: Readability, Content, Presentation of Material, Mathematical Demands, Appearance, Quality of Illustrations, and Teacher Aids. An analysis form is appended as a guide for science teachers and administrators in their evaluation and selection of appropriate science textbooks.…
Descriptors: Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Readability, Reading Materials
Rogers, Arnold R. – New Engl Reading Assoc J, 1970
Descriptors: Basal Reading, Basic Reading, Comparative Analysis, Grade 4
Peer reviewedFoley, Louis – Reading Horizons, 1972
Descriptors: Communication Skills, Grammar, Language Skills, Readability
Peer reviewedBrodbelt, Samuel – Clearing House, 1972
Author suggests criteria that can be weighted mathematically for computing comparable strengths and weaknesses in textbooks. (MB)
Descriptors: Course Objectives, Criteria, Curriculum Development, Mathematical Applications
Peer reviewedDye, Omar A. – Language and Speech, 1971
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, French Literature, Language Ability, Language Patterns
Peer reviewedSimmons, John S.; Cox, Juanita – Journal of Reading, 1972
Descriptors: English Education, Readability, Reading Interests, Reading Level


